Recent posts by jhco50 on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Pedophiles, people like that

Originally posted by Flypurplehamster:

Most people on this site are totally okay with homosexuals doing homosexual things and getting married and stuff. Now, what about bestiality, pedophilia, and stuff like that? Still acceptable? Or over the line? Discuss.

I am sure they are all for it. The people on this site are for anything that could destroy society and remake it in their image.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Is Abortionism misandristic?

Originally posted by vikaTae:

Ultimately the parasitic offspring (that’s what it is) is inside the woman’s body, leeching off her resources. If she does not wish it to leech off her body anymore that is her decision yes – her body, her choice. Hers is the only mind in that body so it gets to make the decision.

Practically a couple should work the issue out between themselves and councillors if appropriate, but when it comes down to it, it is her choice to get the unwanted parasite out of her body if it comes to that.

Ideally we’ll eventually go on to develop artifical, implantable wombs, as that’ll deal with the issue in an effective way: If she does not wish to carry to term and he wishes to keep the foetus, then implant it and a life-support system into him. It is thus no-longer her right to abort it, but his alone; as it’s now his body that is the one affected.

Really vika, babies are parasitic now? You are down to considering babies as parasites? You do realize you were a parasite yourself once. You are so lucky your mom didn’t take an antibiotic.

 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Something needs to be said about feminism/liberalism.

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Is Abortionism misandristic?

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:

A person is “free” to call that developing mass attached to its host WHATEVER they choose. It still does not change any of the parameters involved in the debate that has been ongoing since Roe v. Wade.

.

I have often wondered why your mom didn’t abort you, yet here you are. Don’t you think other fetuses deserver life too?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Is Abortionism misandristic?

Originally posted by Nightshade210:
Originally posted by PrincessLeia101:
Originally posted by Nightshade210:

My main problem with anti-abortion is that a world without abortion would be a world with one less choice, forcing thousands to do something that they may not be physically or mentally prepared to do.

Ok? Be careful during special time then.
Not hard.

You realize that most people who get abortions are rape victims, right?

That is total BS.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Is Abortionism misandristic?

Originally posted by DoomlordKravoka:
Originally posted by PrincessLeia101:

Having only read the OP,

Are you serious? Hell no.
Firstly, it is sick to abort in the first place in my opinion and if my man wants me to freaking kill my child because he don’t want it, he can leave. Or I’mma leave. It isn’t up to him at all. Ya know what else?
If he doesn’t want a child in the first place then GASP stay the hell off!
Not hard.

This thread pisses me off.

I agree with your views, I’m just pointing out that people with an IQ low enough to believe in abortion insist that a woman can abort her child without input from the father because under their logic a child hasn’t been born yet is only property, property that supposedly belongs only to the mother, I am personally of the view that abortion doctors have descended themselves into subhumanity by directly profiting from the murder of children.

It’s abort for profit. Ignorant mothers don’t seem to realize that, or in the case of some on here really don’t give a crap about the babies they make and abort with their distorted view of life. It is just a form of birth control for them with the taxpayer paying for the abortion and Planned Parenthood selling the parts, and in some cases the whole body. Abortion is murder and it is a sign that some in our society have regressed into nothing more than a lower form of animal.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Is Abortionism misandristic?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/19/planned-parenthood-cut-through-babys-face-to-get-his-intact-brain/

And you can watch the latest video from this group and really have your eyes opened

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Effects of Increasing Minimum Wage. Is it good or bad?

Originally posted by thijser:

If a company can lay off workers with minimal effect on sells then why hasn’t it done so yet? Most companies are not going to fire most of their minimal wage employees because the minimal wages increase for the simple reason that without those minimal wage employees the company cannot run. There is the interesting effect that if say mac donalts was to fire it’s entire corporate management the company would be fine for quite a while but if it was to fire all of it’s cashiers the effects would be far more noticable…

Job losses have and are happening. It is mostly to the higher wage earners in the case of Walmart. My wife is what I call a demi-manager. Those are dept. mgr’s. who are now over 3 depts. The bad part is most of the higher paid workers were laid off or quit and these managers are doing all the work. In recent months her store has been trying to hire some new employees at minimum wage, but either they can’t pass the drug test (Pot is legal here) or they quit after they find out they are worked to death.

Pleasedonot5 and Thiser are correct that higher wages means less employment and a contracting economy.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gay Marriage: A Great Loss for Moralism

Originally posted by Kasic:

Planning to respond to my last post, jhco?

Not right now buddy, I have some pressing business to take care of.

 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gay Marriage: A Great Loss for Moralism

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Confederate Flag and Civil Liberties

Changing our immigration laws with an executive order.

I gave you a good book to read.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?125433-Real-reasons-for-the-Civil-War

 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gay Marriage: A Great Loss for Moralism

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gay Marriage: A Great Loss for Moralism

BSG, the republican party was not started by big business and it doesn’t control it anymore than it does the democratic party. I will now go back to ignoring you.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Confederate Flag and Civil Liberties

No kasic, it is different this time. Obama is ignoring the constitution and ruling by edict. He only uses congress when he thinks it will benefit him politically. He is as close to a dictator as I have seen in my lifetime.

Excellence article but no go look at history, it was the liberals that wanted to keep slavery. The Republican party started with the election of Lincoln. Read the Life of Abraham Lincoln by Henry Ketcham. Also, the civil war was not fought over slavery, it was fought over resources, Slavery was a byproduct.

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

I love that quote. However, I don’t see where the confederate flag was mentioned and black slavery was not an issue at that time. they were talking about us and England’s oppressive hand over us. You seem to want to use quotes from something else to make your arguments for an entirely different subject.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gay Marriage: A Great Loss for Moralism

Originally posted by Kasic:
I understand completely. It is you who don’t seem to understand the difference between being a normal part of society and a fringe lunatic.

Fringe lunatic? Homosexuals are ~10% of the population, and a lot more are between either extremes of the sexual spectrum. And if your beliefs are what a “normal” society should be, I’d call that a bigoted, ignorant and repressive hellhole that needs to change.

Sounds like Saudi Arabia actually. Why don’t you go move there jhco? It’d fit your beliefs perfectly. Extremist theocracy, hates gay people, loves corrupt business, treats women like they’re children and doesn’t let them control their own body or have freedom of movement, is pro-death penalty, and more!

9 million (about 3.8%) of Americans identify as gay http://gaylife.about.com/od/comingout/a/population.htm Over estimate much?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gay Marriage: A Great Loss for Moralism

BSA, I rarely challenge you because I like you, but you have stuck your nose in where it shouldn’t be. The problem with liberals and those who seem to be a brick shy of a complete shit house is that they only think of themselves and anyone who might disagree with them are stupid, bigots, homophobes or a whole bunch of names they like to call people who might hold another opinion. Now if you can get over yourself you might consider that your views are not the majority of Americans. Conservatives happen to hold a different view than you but you don’t see us acting like spoiled children, You will see us react to people we think are bigots and self-centered.

It’s also about time you learned a few lessons about conservatives, we don’t support big businesses anymore than liberals. That is a fallacy pushed by one ignorant person on this forum. We do believe in fiscal responsibility and less government interference in our lives. We don’t like a small percentage of society dictating what we should accept, We don’t believe that a just because you smoke dope and have babies we should support you. We believe that if you want to migrate to this country you should go through the legal channels. learn our language, and obey our laws. If you can’t do this stay home. We believe abortion is murder. We believe you should stand as a man and be able to make the choices you want for medical care.

If you feel the need to call us names, know that it makes you look like a child. Grow up.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Does SD need more Right Wing regulars?

Yes you are doing your best Pete, your best to tear our country apart. Liberals would like nothing better than to see America become a 3rd world country. We are almost there. We have how many illegals in the Untied States now? Who brought them here? Liberals. Now we embark on a path of break the bank and spend all you can steal from those you claim to want to help. Who would do this, who would destroy the middle class with taxes? Liberals. You tell me to get a grip….on what? Maybe the mess your kind have laid upon us? Maybe my ancestors, friends, and I who fought to keep America free should turn our backs and let people like those on here destroy what is left of America? I wish liberals would think about the collateral damage they always cause with their feel good policies.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gay Marriage: A Great Loss for Moralism

Originally posted by Kasic:
Originally posted by jhco50:
Originally posted by karmakoolkid:

Of course, I am for legal (marriage) polygamy …. of ADULTS …duh.
And, I don’t wanna hear any of this slippery slope shit of: marrying mah pickumup truck, marrying mah dawg, marrying mah sister, marrying my 12 y.o. neighbor that is the fodder of the radical-right.

But, vika …. what other forms of legal unions similar to marriage do you see “on the horizon” that go “beyond” polygamy? Are there even any … does it end w/ polygamy? At first thought, it would seem that SSM, 2-person, and multi-person about covers it all.

Of course you would be for polygamy karma. You support anything that is against society’s normality. Actually, I’m surprised to see you don’t support marrying your truck, dawg and 12 yo neighbor..

If you honestly can’t understand the difference between a child, animal, or inanimate object and another adult when it comes to consent, you have no place in any adult discussions.

I understand completely. It is you who don’t seem to understand the difference between being a normal part of society and a fringe lunatic. I tire of the nonsensical fringe constantly waving the banner for all that is against normal society, lacking real knowledge of what they strive for. Reminds me of the hippies of the 60’s. A bunch of bums doing dope and bumming their livelihood off those who were self supporting.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gay Marriage: A Great Loss for Moralism

Originally posted by FlabbyWoofWoof:

jhco50

You support anything that is against society’s normality.


You are way behind the times jhco, gay marriage is the norm…it would seem that it is you that is against society.

No I am not behind the times and gay marriage is not normal. If you think they can pass a law and people will all of a sudden put all their personal beliefs aside for a tiny segment of the population you are the one behind. Law or no law, homosexuals will never be accepted by mainstream. Sure you will have those in the far left that embrace this tiny segment and wet themselves for the wonderful feelings of good they believe they have done, but those are the only friends you have.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Confederate Flag and Civil Liberties

Originally posted by Kasic:
Why is it necessary for the federal government to meddle in state affairs?

As a general question, it is necessary when the rights and freedoms of people living there are being denied by the state. Examples include abolishing slavery, women’s rights, and homosexual rights. If the state refuses to do it by themselves, then an intervention is required.

Regarding the Confederate flag, I don’t think a federal mandate is required or necessary. It’s a flag. However distasteful or inappropriate one might find it, the flag isn’t hurting anyone. It might represent certain views still present, but taking the flag off publicly owned land won’t change that. While I personally think that it’s kind of dumb to fly the flag of traitors in your state’s capital, the decision to or not should be decided by the state.

Only liberals and dictators ignore what the constitution says to further their control of the country and it’s people.

The constitution was made to be amended and updated by future generations. The founding fathers said that directly. They really were wise, and ironically, the people who cry the loudest about wanting to defend them (Conservatives) are the ones most guilty of doing what they said was stupid.

Every constitution, then, and every law, naturally expires at the end of nineteen years. If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force, and not of right. It may be said, that the succeeding generation exercising, in fact, the power of repeal, this leaves them as free as if the constitution or law had been expressly limited to nineteen years only. In the first place, this objection admits the right, in proposing an equivalent. But the power of repeal is not an equivalent. It might be, indeed, if every form of government were so perfectly contrived, that the will of the majority could always be obtained, fairly and without impediment. But this is true of no form. The people cannot assemble themselves; their representation is unequal and vicious. Various checks are opposed to every legislative proposition. Factions get possession of the public councils, bribery corrupts them, personal interests lead them astray from the general interests of their constituents; and other impediments arise, so as to prove to every practical man, that a law of limited duration is much more manageable than one which needs a repeal." —Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1789. ME 7:459, Papers 15:396

We haven’t worried about our freedoms that much until Obama become president and turned the country upside down. It’s the feds that we worry about. Hell, they are even taking states rights. On the slavery issue, if you look at history it was the liberal party that stifled the freedoms of blacks, and the conservatives that were pushing to give them rights. On the other issues, the feds should have no dealings with either. They are not given that power to make decisions that should be done by the states. It’s funny how you guys try to put your petty desires as a constitutional right when it has nothing to do with them. When the feds are involved, they are breaking constitutional law as the constitution never gave them that power. It is not up to the feds to dictate to the states as each state is a separate entity. Our country was designed this way to preserve freedom and to keep one dictator (Obama for instance) from telling the states or the people how to govern themselves. Our federal government is way out of line.

Yes, the constitution can be amended but not by Obama. There are procedures and that is why it is not constantly amended. You really should do a bit of reading, because you really have a perverted view of what the constitution says.. The basic wording tells each branch of government what powers they have. The Bill of Rights were put in after it was written In order to get it approved by all of the states. 13 at that time.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gay Marriage: A Great Loss for Moralism

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:

Of course, I am for legal (marriage) polygamy …. of ADULTS …duh.
And, I don’t wanna hear any of this slippery slope shit of: marrying mah pickumup truck, marrying mah dawg, marrying mah sister, marrying my 12 y.o. neighbor that is the fodder of the radical-right.

But, vika …. what other forms of legal unions similar to marriage do you see “on the horizon” that go “beyond” polygamy? Are there even any … does it end w/ polygamy? At first thought, it would seem that SSM, 2-person, and multi-person about covers it all.

Of course you would be for polygamy karma. You support anything that is against society’s normality. Actually, I’m surprised to see you don’t support marrying your truck, dawg and 12 yo neighbor..

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Does SD need more Right Wing regulars?

Originally posted by petesahooligan:

Issendorf, you make a cogent point about the shift in congressional seats. I know that there has been a lot of frustration with government by the American public. It’s good that we, the people, fired a bunch of do-nothings.

It’s awesome what congress has been able to do with its Republican control, don’t you think? I still stand by Obama as a great president that has helped turn the country around after a miserable effort by some shrub.

And I’m going to vote for Bernie Sanders. I thought you might enjoy that, issendorf. In fact, I’m going to vote for him twice.

I do think most conservatives (especially social conservatives) are:
• White dudes
• Selfish
• Idiots

In no particular order.

Actually that is how we view liberals. If you look at yourselves you are a lot of talk and the only actions you take are those that destroy many other people in the name of a small percentage. Does it matter that you destroy the traditional beliefs in marraige for a minority of oddballs who are a mit mentally unbalanced? No? Does it matter that your messiah has spent our country into oblivion? Destroying our economy and the middle class? Conservatism means fiscal responsibility and freedom.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Confederate Flag and Civil Liberties

Karma, if it wasn’t for me you would have no one to post at except your fellow village -—-. I feel sorry for you and your loathing of information that goes against your communist ways. You sir are not a patriot. You push the same agenda as Obama and want this country to be destroyed and made into a dictatorship. You have admitted this on earlier pages indirectly. All you talk about are things that divide and destroy our society. [snip]

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Confederate Flag and Civil Liberties

Why is it necessary for the federal government to meddle in state affairs? They, by the constitution are not supposed to tell states what to do. The only powers granted to them by the constitution is “inter-state” commerce and foreign affairs. Only liberals and dictators ignore what the constitution says to further their control of the country and it’s people.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Confederate Flag and Civil Liberties

Originally posted by petesahooligan:

I remember when America was great! I’m old enough.

When marijuana possession could land you a life sentence.
When cops in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles were openly corrupt and corruptible.
When there was no safe way to get an abortion.
When women could be abused in a marriage and if they left, had no legal protection.
When business owners could hire and fire people based on their race or gender.
When business owners could hire and fire people if they put out.
When they could ship you off to war if they had one going on.
When, once, they executed people suspected of witchcraft.
When they brought the world to the brink of global nuclear war.
When they became the only nation in the world to use a nuclear weapon in wartime.
When they started a war based on obscure political principles and thousands died.
When they started another war based on obscure political principles and thousands more died.
When they preferred to uphold “gun rights” even though it was literally killing their children.
When they were one of the last first-world nations to accept the need for tighter environmental regulations.
When the argument over the right to OWN people almost tore the nation into pieces.

I don’t really remember all of that… but that’s the country that we’re supposed to be patriotic for.

It’s ironic to me that “love it or leave it” is such a popular motif in juvenile right-wing rebuttals, and yet these same people are quick to discredit the value of migration. Does that mean that a patriotic Islamic Statesman is more valuable than an individual that hates ISIS because of that patriotism? Is that the “value” of patriotism… it’s just blind commitment to an idea and unconditional love of country?

You know something pete? That was just a stupid post with a total lack of historical knowledge. If you want to make a post with a rundown of faults of the US at least put in some detail as to why some of these things were done the way they were. I will give you one example, the nuclear bomb over Hiroshima, It ended WW2. It saved a lot of allied lives. It is easy to blurt out things without any background on them. Didn’t you make a thread awhile back that bit you in the butt for the same thing?

Oh and why is it so bad to say love it or leave it? If you can’t stand America, there is nothing stopping you from going to another country that has a dictator you like.