Recent posts by axlkoegoskyeg on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Le My Immortal Dramatic Reading( Oh, I am back, BTW ).

Praticing on my own writing, essentially… That said… Eventually, OT begun getting a bit dull. And I am 99.99% sure Ebony is what is called a author avatar( What is… Well, the term speaks for itself ), and, honestly, if you are going to do THAT in a fanfic, you should at least be subtle enough so that people would NOT notice… That said, as you might recall, I have a history of bashing Twilight, but eventually, it got old, so I though this would be a nice way for me to re-introduce myself.

Now, should I proceed to the next chapter, or…?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Le My Immortal Dramatic Reading( Oh, I am back, BTW ).

So… Yes, I decided I could make a dramatic reading of My Immortal. As I had nothing better to do with my day. I though it wouldnt be very fitting for the Arts forums, as technically, My Immortal is not my creation at all: I am just making a comic, dramatic reading of it. So, if any of you believe My Immortal should never see daylight again… Well, I am bored, and nobody forced you to click this title.

Hi my name is Ebony Dark’ness Dementia Raven Way and I have long ebony black hair (that’s how I got my name) Basic writing tip: If you cannot imagine a mother giving out this name to a newborn child, without laughing, out loud… It is not a good name with purple streaks and red tips that reaches my mid-back and icy blue eyes like limpid tears and a lot of people tell me I look like Amy Lee (AN: if u don’t know who she is get da hell out of here!). I’m not related to Gerard Way but I wish I was because he’s a major fucking hottie … Are you saiyng you wished that the guy you are attracted to, was your relative? What is the matter wi-No, wait, you wrote my Immortal, I shouldnt be surprised. I’m a vampire but my teeth are straight and white. I have pale white skin. I’m also a witch, and I go to a magic school called Hogwarts in England where I’m in the seventh year (I’m seventeen)* … And Dumbledore-Or anyone in his right mind-Would allow vampires into a school because….?* . I’m a goth (in case you couldn’t tell) and I wear mostly black. I love Hot Topic and I buy all my clothes from there I am a Asperger. I understand nothing of clothes. My mother has to choose my clothes for me. And even I know, no goth with self-respect would buy her clothes in Hot Topic. For example today I was wearing a black corset with matching lace around it and a black leather miniskirt, pink fishnets and black combat boots Congratulations. You have a worst sense of fashion then the Asperger kid whose mother has to choose his clothes for him. Here is your award. I was wearing black lipstick, white foundation, black eyeliner and red eye shadow. I was walking outside Hogwarts. It was snowing and raining Wut? so there was no sun, which I was very happy about. A lot of preps What is a prep? stared at me. I put up my middle finger at them.

“Hey Ebony!” shouted a voice. I looked up. It was…. Draco Malfoy!

“What’s up Draco?” I asked.

“Nothing.” he said shyly Draco doesnt say things shily. He wants something, and take it. Or… Tries to take it, fail, and cries to his daddy like a little spoiled bitch. That is pretty much how he acted during 90% of the books.

But then, I heard my friends call me and I had to go away.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

AN: IS it good? PLZ tell me fangz!No, it isnt.

I will be back to bring you more pain soon.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Yu-Gi-Oh! BAM / Card Ideas

That reminds me, from back when I posted cards in the Kongai topic… And was no good at it.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Yu-Gi-Oh! BAM / Card Ideas

Hi… So, errr… I happened to have designed a few card concepts( As if you couldnt guess so far already ). Problem is, well.. I dont really know how to put it in the format, and even if I did, I am not sure if I could find any that would fit… So, I think I will just post the card stats for now…

First of all: VERY loosely inspired in the Egyptian Gods… The Dragonlords:

Dragonlord Tempus of the Storm( Level 10 )
Attribute: Air.
Type: Dragon.
Power:3000
Life:2500
Special: Dragonlord Tempus of the Storm will, at Round Start, deal 1000 damage to the enemy by each creature on his side of the field. If the opponent has 3 creatures on his side of the field at Round Start, Dragonlord Tempus of the Storm will also destroy all spells and creatures on his side of the field.

Dragonlord Leviathan of the Ocean( Level 10 )
Attribute: Water
Type: Dragon
Power:3000
Life: 2500
Special: Dragonlord Leviathan of the Ocean gains 500 Power each turn by each spell on the owner side of the field. If the owner has 3 spells at Round Start, Dragonlord Leviathan of the Ocean will gain Immunity at Round Start.

Dragonlord Sylvanus of the Forest( Level 10 )
Attribute: Earth
Type: Dragon
Power: 3000
Life: 2500
Special: Dragonlord Sylvanus of the Forest will negate any effect that would lower the Power of the owner creatures or increase the power of enemy creatures.

^^They might be a bit TOO strong… But I intended then to add a bit of a twist to conventional Yu-Gi-Oh BAM strategy. Of course, as I dont even have a art, the chances of they getting approved is near 0, but still, I though to myself: Why NOT share it.

PS: All of this was originally posted in another topic, also by myself… I will now proceed to delete the original one…

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games / Corrupt-a-Wish

Granted, but your game is so old, it dies of a long age somehow.
I wish for the body that every woman would wish for.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Would you kill your family... To save your city?

This is one of those threads whose title, is already the OP.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / AX: Guns never existed.

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:

Considering the fact that, well… The army of a hipotethical dictatorship still WOULD be greatly outnumbered, but now no longer with a hypotethical very massive advantage when it comes to the level of their weaponry now, wouldnt it?

Sorry, I don’t get it. Guns only give you a massive advantage when you have them and the other guys don’t. If no one has them, the strongest guy wins. Longbows are the next best thing to a trump card but they take years of training and even more strength.

I’ve done some work with swords too, though probably not as much as you have. One of the big differences is that fancy swordplay like predicting your enemy’s move is only effective for one-on-one fighting – and no society that relied on melee did much one-on-one fighting; they used shieldwall or swarm tactics.

As for the which-society thing, well, in Europe they didn’t start colonizing until the age of gunpowder, but the Chinese, Romans, Muslims, Mongols, etc all carved out vast empires without guns. So the argument about dictators not being able to control their population without guns doesn’t work.

To your edit…without guns (and bombs) we wouldn’t have much of a terrorism problem at all. Yes, planes would still get hijacked but as we’ve seen that’s a lot harder to pull off after the first time. But there would be no suicide bombers – islam would have to fallback on the old shi’a drugged-out assassin trick.

Well, problem is, typically, in a society where advanced military technology DO exist, the governmant will typically have easier acess to truly high military power then the population. A pistol and a pistol may be balanced, but a pistol would make little difference against a tank for a instance now, wouldnt it?

I will give it to the Chinese, Romans, Muslims etc. etc, however, these governments followed a far different then our dictatorships did. I dont know much about the structure of the Mongol empire, specifically, but as for the others… If I recall right, they followed a very feudal structure, with most of the population being focused in the fields. What meant, less population would be in the cities.What means, less populations would be in largely concentrated areas with easy acess to information exchange. What means, the chances of a large-scale rebellion would be quite lower. When you factor in internet, it might be easier for then to do something along the lines of such mass-scale rebelion anyway. But again, the governmant can just restrain the acess to internet to the minimun, just like North Korea…

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / AX: Guns never existed.

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:

being big and strong

Yeah, this. We’d literally have strongman societies. In fact, you could probably argue that democracy would be a historical footnote if guns didn’t exist. The longbow would be the weapon of choice but it takes years to use it to quickly and accurately kill an armor-wearing person at long-range, so alot of societies would retain a yeoman class, further hampering social mobility.

Actually, as Omega observed, this is not necesserially true. Considering the fact that, well… The army of a hipotethical dictatorship still WOULD be greatly outnumbered, but now no longer with a hypotethical very massive advantage when it comes to the level of their weaponry now, wouldnt it?

Besides, for who, like me, bothered to pratice with swords, strenght isnt everything you know. It is not rarely much more about technice and predicting your enemy moves then brute strenght. Sure, brute strenght helps, but you shouldnt rely too much on it…

As for a return to feudalism: Unlikely. At least, I dont see much of a association… Feudalism wasnt defeated as much by guns, as by the rapid growth of the cities, as well as commerce as a whole…

As for myself: I think wars and terrorist attacks would cause less deaths… But exactly because of this, perhaps we would have more wars then we have today( And it wouldnt have affected 9/11 directly, as the plain used wasnt a military plain, BTW ). There is a chance large criminal organizations could gather up a military force comparaeble to the one of small countries, though… At the same time, powerfull countries( Such as the USA ) wouldnt have as much of a military advantage-As military tradition and training itself would matter more then actual economical resources…

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / AX: Guns never existed.

AX: The military technology did not advanced since the Medieval age. Somehow, this didnt affected any other area of technology, nor had any significant, direct impact on any large, historical event in our past( Ex: The World Wars, the Independence etc. etc. ). For all effects, consider this a society much like ours, except that guns, as well any other form of modern weaponry, were wiped out from existance and humam memory alike.

Assuming this scenario, I ask… How do you think the unexistance of advanced military technology would affect our society?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Elements / Ideas for Elements CCG (Destructive criticism will be ignored)

Wow. These forums sure died in my abstinence. So, anyway…

Timelord(Creature. Cost: 15 Time quanta )
7/5
On sucessfull attack: Temporal machine God reshuffles all creatures on both sides of the field, except himself.

Just though I should put it here…

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Should the Law have some control over what is done to one's own body?

Originally posted by HolyLasagna:

Thanks for the fanatic impractical ideology-driven statement with no reasoning and counter-arguments backing it up.


It would be nice to see if someone can link this discussion if the fact that America is getting more and more obese each decade.
P.S. Edited the OP with another questioning.

Actually, his exact words were their own body. That is, if it affects someone else, they shouldnt do it.

What means, according to my interpretation, stuff along the lines of abortion, or smoking in public places, shouldnt be allowed. As it would actually be harming someone else. Taking drugs may be allowed, but if the drugs are strong enough to trigger a violent behavior, also not, because again, you would be risking the lives of others. Etc. etc. etc…

To me, personally, that seems like a very reasonable explanation

Originally posted by Draconavin:

Why do babies deserve more rights than the rest of us, jhco?
No matter what, they have no real value, but to be emotional baggage until they learn to communicate effectively.
Don’t forget, your animal instincts are what drive you to have compulsion to protect babies. It is your animal wants that force you to behave, and hold irrational views. It’s important to note that we are hard wired to protect our offspring, and they are built softer than other animal offspring for the shear purpose of us to focus our attention on nurturing them and their development. Your animal urge that makes your blood boil when a baby cries, and you suspect fowl play. Your animal urge to push to console a baby in distress. Our confirmation bias based on emotional cues, can skew our perception on the value of a baby to such proportions it can be unfathomable. Sometimes we falsely look to protect things that our vestigial emotional cues have no purpose to the expanding future of better self-control, increased awareness, and above all, knowing when emotions are falsely leading us astray.

How do we have any real value, then?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Should we tolerate the intolerant?

So, to some up what seems to be the general viewpoint of this threa: Should we tolerate the intolerant? Yes… At least, for as long as they dont appeal to outright violence, that is…

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Global Climate Change - Get off our lazy butts!

What is the AX here, exactly?
And while there are indeed many things we, civilians, can do( Such as, avoiding too many oil-based products ) truth is, chances are, without a huge reform in the whole industrial citizen… It wont make much of a difference.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Why do people like anime?

I will try to put it in a very simple manner: What is best: Cartoon Network, or TV Tokio?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun Issues

I return…

Originally posted by jhco50:

Karma, I have not replied to any of your posts because they were pretty good. We differ on requiring anything that infringes on the 2nd amendment. It means and says what it means. I don’t dismiss our founders as compromising on the Constitution. They new what they were doing. The real reason for the Constitution was to be able to fund the government. The Continental Congress were unable to have any sway in the duties they did have, which were not many. Basically, our rule of law, although thorough and probably the best Constitution ever written, was to allow funding for our government.

It is only the law abiding citizen who follows laws. The criminal ignores them. Glados is right, the honest citizen would more than likely turn in their guns, not all of them, just some. Still, they would be afraid to use them for threat of prosecution. We can look at the UK to see this.

I look at rights differently than you do. Rights are God Given, or natural rights. Privileges are granted by the government. Privileges can be are easily taken, rights aren’t. I don’t look at my fellow man as stupid. Yes, we have a few who are a few bricks shy of a full stack, but the majority are upstanding and intelligent.

We are having record sales of firearms and ammunition. I look at this with a bit of disdain as It causes a shortage for all of us. Try finding .223 ammo right now. Popular firearms are gone, back ordered for months. Yet with all of these new shooters, experienced shooters will take them under their wings and teach them. Just recently an experienced shot-gunner took be under his wing and showed me something new. This is how the firearms community works. Our country has had the right to bear arms for 250 years. We have accepted some bad with the good

I do agree, there are those who have no business picking up a gun or driving a car. But we can’t take away the rights of others for these few…that is a dictatorship. It seems every time a person stubs a toe, do-gooders what a rash of new laws to prevent stubbed toes. They always become irrational and go overboard. There will always be some danger in just living. A good example of this over reaction is lead paint. People have lived and become adults for a hundred years with lead paint in their house. all of a sudden it has become so hazardous we have to treat it like it’s radiation. Irrational behavior like this has become rampant.

I listened to a program the other night with a doctor talking about the drugs I brought up earlier. She said these drugs, which are depressives, are causing irrational behavior in our young people. If they are not the right dosage, or if the person starts taking them to0 fast or quit them too fast, they cause depression, suicidal tendencies, or violence. All of the young people who have committed mass murders has been on some form of these drugs. Why don’t we research this? We have more children on these drugs than any other country in the world. The more I read about these drugs, the more I see a connection. If I can find material on these drugs, why can’t our government? Why do they ignore this possible cause and instead go after a right? Sounds a bit like politics to me.

Ok, lets go through it part by part, shall we?

It is only the law abiding citizen who follows laws. The criminal ignores them. Difference is not all that clear. A criminal can follow the law, if it suits him, and even a honest citizen can be forced to break the law under desperate situations. Either way, the way you put it seems to, again, ignore a quite important point of mine: While you claim that guns are necessary for self defense, my whole point is that the reason of making a law against guns is making self defense unnecessary. Now, am I saiyng there would be no crime if there were no guns? No, but there would be LESS crime if there were no guns, or if at least, to acquire then was a more difficult process… Besides, under regular circunstances, a killer wont hesitate to pull the trigger, but a regular person would. And that can make a huge difference

I look at rights differently than you do. Rights are God Given, or natural rights Now, how are we suppose to prove a specific right is natural or not? Besides, not negating the existance of a X or Y right, I cannot believe you can say any right is absolute. A serial killer, for a instance, at my viewpoint, doesnt have the right to live. So, looking at guns in the other hand, would it be fair to assume that, in the minute the possession of guns represents a danger to the very life of others, that means it is fair to negate that right? Coming from that assumption, deemed as guns were designed with the intention of killing, and are effective at it, cant we say a society on which anyone can acquire a gun would have more deaths, deemed as those who would have the desire of killing, would also have a easy mean of doing so?

I do agree, there are those who have no business picking up a gun or driving a car. But we can’t take away the rights of others for these few…that is a dictatorship But isnt part of the duty of a governmant to protect its citizens? Nobody is, of course, talking about preventing people from doing dangerous things… Assuming they are the only ones who are put in danger by these actions. But, in the wrong hands, a gun DO represents a great danger. So does a car, thus why we can take away ones driver license.

I have to strongly agree with you when it comes to the drugs, however. I support the right of anyone to do as it pleases with its own body, but the problem with drugs, is the level they can take someone. I live in Brazil, and I can tell you the following: One is simply no longer the same person when in drugs. Depending of the level of the addiction, one is capaeble of killing for another dose, and completely loses the sense of reasonable…

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / So, let us say you are fourty, married, and father of a 13 years old child. Everything goes great, when suddenly...

Originally posted by MFTMFTMFTMFTMFT:

Is he a boy? If so, I kill him

So, if it is a girl, you wouldnt?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / So, let us say you are fourty, married, and father of a 13 years old child. Everything goes great, when suddenly...

( Dramatic silence )

Your child comes to you and say he/her secretly likes Twilight.

What do you do when confronted with this family drama?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Feminism and Sexual Equality

Originally posted by vikaTae:
Originally posted by axlkoegoskyeg:

He. Assuming I was to see myself in this situation, my classic reaction would be simply to grab the incoming feet with my hands, and go on, pushing the feet upwards until it twists. Although, if I get REALLY unlucky, I might wind up falling in a angle such that one of my arms will be crushed by my own body weight.

Personally, I’d use the taser first, and follow up with physical violence later if necessary. (i.e. if the first taser blast didn’t do more than slow you down, I’d need to add a little something to the second one.) Two or three kicks to the windpipe would be a good way to slow the would-be assaulter down further. I’d need two or three because my aim is piss-poor. I’d aim at the windpipe and probably end up breaking his nose or his solar plexus the first time.

But then I don’t initiate physical violence, only defend, so my strategies reflect that. Someone like Helltank, who initiates a fight, is going to have a very different approach to the problem.

If your average guy struck me in the head with a baseball bat with all he has got, my classic reaction would be just to shout a insult and continue walking as if the blow didnt happened.

An advantage of not having your central nervous system located inside your body? (no brain present, means no concussion.)

Nope, just really, really thick skulled. In both meanings of the word, honestly. I been punched, kicked, bashed, and even bitten in various parts of my body without suffering more then a couple of red marks. Obviously, I am pretty sure that a weapon could still injure me( I never got shot. And I am not stupid enough to shoot myself just to know if it can hurt me, as most likely, it WILL ).

I almost never initiate violence myself. When I enter combat, my motivation will generally be not so much destroiyng the enemy, as it would be to simply overwhelm it in such a way it will have little choice but to surrender. Had to use it a lot with excessivelly persistent bullies. One of my favourite tactics against a individual enemy, assuming no weapons on either of us, is giving him a fairly weak push with my hand, just strong enough so it loses balance, then giving a stronger push in direction to a wall and immobilizing him against it. If the enemy keeps triyng to hit me in that position-And it will be in a very bad angle for it-I would generally simply apply more and more pressure, until he EVENTUALLY surrenders.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Anime Addicts Anonymous (AAA)

Well, I didnt entered here so far, because the only anime I actually followed up and enjoyed was DBZ. Recently, however, I also tried up Bleach, and Fairy Tail. Both seemed very intersting to me… Tested up Vampire Knight, but, how do I put it… It SEEMED intersting… To who actually likes this kind of stuff. For me, the stance the show seems to take on vampires and vampirism as a whole seems a bit weird, and honestly, not a huge vampire romance kind of guy anyway. I DO, however, would recomend it to those who liked( Ugh ) Twilight, as while it had theme similarities, Vampire Knight was WAAAAAY much more well written.

Overral, now that I got myself started on my addiction, do anyone have any suggestion of a anime that would help it to completely take over me?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / If You Had A Choice...

1: Canada, based in what I heard of it.
2: Male
3: Thinner, with a decent skin( I have squiized stuff out of my skin, that you wouldnt even believe… ).

Once that thread mentioned, I have lately found myself wondering how would it be like if I was a girl. No, I am not a transexual… Well, at least I THINK I am not, anyway. It is not a strong desire or anything, and either way, considering my bodytype, I am pretty sure I would be as ugly as a girl can get.Rather one of those classic What if… stuff.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Do you care about people caring about you?

Of course. Even if just for gratitude sake.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Feminism and Sexual Equality

Originally posted by vikaTae:

It is worth noting that although our upper body strength is weaker, a woman can kick harder than any man ever could. This is because of the way our hips are set, which gives us a much greater torque.

Once you’re on the ground, a woman who knows what she is doing, can pulverise you with her kicks, far more bloodily than you’d get from punches from a man. Kick like a mule is very apt.

He. Assuming I was to see myself in this situation, my classic reaction would be simply to grab the incoming feet with my hands, and go on, pushing the feet upwards until it twists. Although, if I get REALLY unlucky, I might wind up falling in a angle such that one of my arms will be crushed by my own body weight. But that is unlickely, deemed as, if I have a advantage in physical combat, is a unusual physical resistance. If your average guy struck me in the head with a baseball bat with all he has got, my classic reaction would be just to shout a insult and continue walking as if the blow didnt happened.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Feminism and Sexual Equality

Originally posted by helltank:

axl:That’s probably because men are too ashamed to report that they have been raped. They might even have been drugged(that’s the most practical way to rape someone, man or woman) and can’t remember anything.

Or perhaps they made a report but the police didn’t have enough evidence to bring the woman to court.

The secound and the third can just as well happen with woman. The first kinda too, although by different reasons. It is not rare for a rape victin to feel unpure, as if she had seduced its rapist somehow, what is NOT true, of course, but you cant blaim me for human psycology.

Obviously, I am not saiyng action shouldnt be taken about woman that rape man. I am merely saiyng it already is.

Originally posted by helltank:

I am a total egalitarian. While this means that I treat girls fairly and give them an equal chance if, say, I was picking people to play soccer with me, it also means that I treat them exactly like I do a boy.


Lots of people say they want equality, yet they complain when I hit a girl. I hit boys, why not hit a girl?

Generally, I hit neither. But, if am I to be punched by someone, boy or girl, I WILL punch back.

It is a bit annoiyng how people ignore abuse when it is the woman who commits the abuse. Merely because it is rarer, and the girl is generally physically weaker, it doesnt mean it doesnt happen.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Would you visit a nudist camp,,how shy are you?

Kinda jumping in this thread, if I may…
I am rather insecure about my body, honestly( You would too, if you, like me, had managed to become fat and muscular at the same time ). But assuming, hipotethically, I lived in a society where nudity is common, and NOT associated to sex, I probably wouldnt have a problem with it, as I would know nobody would look at me THAT way…

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Lucid Dreaming

Originally posted by kyle_sanderson:
Originally posted by Aldir:

I had a lucid dream last night but I can’t remember. I do remember being amazed that I was aware of my dream though.

Could you change your surroundings? For some reason I can’t. :(

Originally posted by Jaskaran2000:

Say Abracadabra

Should do the trick.

Are you sure it was a lucid dream… Rather then you being IRL, and believing to be dreaming?