Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: General Gaming /
Can't connect to any servers
Any multiplayer game i own on the PC (EVE, GuildWars, Combat Arms, ect..) Either doesn’t connect period (Guildwars won’t connect to Arenanet) or a message comes up saying i’m not connected to the internet, which I am. Any clues as to what i need to do to fix this problem?
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Serious Discussion /
Drawing in 2D, 3D?
I’m pretty sure i didn’t know exactly what i was talking about yes, and i’m a stubborn blockhead when it comes to arguing with him, because we.. well.. argue. a lot. It’s entertaining. But i’m looking for opinions on the subject, not obvious statements. I stated that we’re talking about the same thing a few times, but he didn’t quite understand that and then tried to point the exact same thing out back to me.
And the perfectly flat dick part was that he told me he he’d realized randomly an equation to make a right triangle out of any number, so he told me to give him a number.
I picked 2.
He said suck my dick, because the equation couldn’t be done without making a triangle without one side. So yeah. The conversation got a little complicated after that.
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Serious Discussion /
Drawing in 2D, 3D?
A friend and I have been having a heated discussion on this, and I’d like to know what you all think.
It’s difficult to explain, since most of what i said was in the heat of the moment and the argument is over, since he’s logged off of MSN. And i take shortcuts. So if you’re willing to read it, here’s the conversation logs:
*
dana says:
there are 2D things everywhere
so thus, if a 2D dick around, it would be easy to suck
Anthony says:
what?
if a 2D dick around, makes no sense. explain
dana says:
if there was a^
Anthony says:
How, since 2D is in a differant D than 3D. like YOU said, just because they don’t effect our 3D doesn’t mean they aren’t there
But they don’t effect us. which is the point. Well, physically. they can affect us mentally.
did u get that <_<
How, since 2D is in a differant D than 3D. like YOU said, just because they don’t effect our 3D doesn’t mean they aren’t there
But they don’t effect us. which is the point. Well, physically. they can affect us mentally.
dana says:
nope
2D things don’t effect us, but if dimentions follow any sort of consistency, we can effect them
so thus by sucking where a 2D dick is, we would technically be sucking on it
Anthony says:
And how would you be sucking a 2D dick exactly? Look, we can draw 2D and change 2D, but we can’t touch the 2D, because we’re drawing it in 3D. Does that make snese?
sense*
dana says:
can’t draw 2D
Anthony says:
Paper and lines, you can draw something in 2D
that doesn’t make it 2D
dana says:
no
that’s 3D
Anthony says:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension
“a line describes one dimension, a plane describes two dimensions, and a cube describes three dimensions”
You CAN draw in 2D. that makes it a 2D drawing in 3D. You can’t suck the 2D, but you can suck the drawing.
take a look about halfway down the page, they’re pictures that make it simpler.
dana says:
no
you can only theorize in 2D
of 2D*
Anthony says:
And what makes you say that?
dana says:
you cannot see anything that is in 2D
the light doesn’t touch it
Anthony says:
But you can touch it.
dana says:
no
Anthony says:
THEN YOU FAIL
cuzz if you can’t touch it
how are you sucking it.
dana says:
you can’t touch it
you can effect it
Anthony says:
how.
dana says:
idk
Anthony says:
Then what makes you so sure
dana says:
but 4D effects us
Anthony says:
So you’re assuming.
dana says:
and if dimentions follow any sort of consistency, then we can effect 2D
yes
but it’s the best assumption
Anthony says:
Forget that, i don’t work with assumptions. i’ve found multiple sites so far talking about 3D and 2D
dana says:
lol
Anthony says:
question
what IS 4D
dana says:
1 sec makes site see, go look at AnthonySucks.com
spacetime
Anthony says:
And where did you learn about it
dana says:
lannie
Anthony says:
Ah.
dana says:
and i have seen a lil bit about it on internet/school
Anthony says:
So, my main point so far, you say you can effect 2D, but you can’t draw it.
correct?
dana says:
yes
brb, food
Anthony says:
What defines 2D then.
who’s the physics teacher at LCC?
dana says:
idk
we only know 2D as 2D
Anthony says:
because have you ever heard of someone who’s refering to a drawing of a stick figure in 3D? the stickfigure on a piece of paper is a 2D picture, on a 3D object.
dana says:
because we cannot see it and nor does it effect us
name one 2D object in a drawing
you can’t
Anthony says:
AHA
2D
is length and width
dana says:
a drawing is technically a colored sculpture based on paper
Anthony says:
3D is length width and hieght
dana says:
yeah
Anthony says:
So a picture of a stick man
isn’t in 3D, because it has no hieght in it
otherwise, it wouldn’t be flat.
dana says:
yes there is
it isn’t flat
you are putting black graphite on top of white paper
Anthony says:
THAT’S WHERE WE’RE GETTING CONFUSED
dana says:
and the paper itself isn’t 2D anyways
Anthony says:
remember what i said at the very start of this?
“You can draw in 2D, that doesn’t make it 2D.”
dana says:
nope
Anthony says:
just because you’re drawing a 2D object, you’re still drawing it in 3D
dana says:
that doesn’t make sense
so i ignored it
Anthony says:
It makes perfect sense
you’re just not comprehending it
dana says:
it makes perfect sense in the ears of the speaker
Anthony says:
that doesn’t not make the drawing a 2D drawing
dana says:
everything does
you can draw and theoreticaly think of the picture as 2D
Anthony says:
sigh
How much of this havey ou actually learned
dana says:
but any truly 2D objects would be invisible
Anthony says:
and how much are you just taking off of what you’ve heard
dana says:
i’m just gunna ignore that
but that was the only thing i ignored
Anthony says:
You really aren’t listening to what i’m saying.
I’m saying that you can draw a 2D object. That doesn’t make it a 2D object. Which is just what you’re saying, only much much simpler. But you KEEP ON TRYING to prove me wrong, but by doing so you’re just saying what i’m saying is right.
dana says:
ok, ur thing could have meant 2 things
and that was different
Anthony says:
what was the 2nd thing then
dana says:
ok, ur statement could have meant "you can draw things in 2D
which u can’t
as i said, it’s all 3D
or, u can draw objects that are 2D
in which case, no u can’t
because 2D things are invisible
and so you can’t draw them
because you can’t see them
Anthony says:
they’re not invisible if you can draw them, which you can
dana says:
no
u can’t
how do u see something?
Anthony says:
optical nerves.
dana says:
being hit by visible light
2D things being only 2D, cannot be hit by light
and so cannot effect light
which means in no way shape or form can light show you the shape of a 2D object
Anthony says:
this doesn’t mean you can’t draw a 2D object
dana says:
but you can’t see a 2D object
Anthony says:
YOu can draw a 3D respresentation of a 2D object. Just because it’s a representation doesn’t change the fact that it’s a 2D object.
IF you couldn’t draw a 2D object, people wouldn’t refer to it as 2D then would they. Trust the fact that there are people who ahve probably thought of this before, are smarter than you and i, and it’s still called 2D drawings
there’s even college courses on 2D drawings.
so you can’t really argue that you can’t draw 2D
dana says:
you can draw a 3D representation of an object which is a visible representation of a 2D object
artists aren’t math and physics majors
Anthony says:
"You can draw a 3D representation of an object, that object being a 2D object visually represented*
dana says:
yes?
Anthony says:
Yet i’m still pretty sure that physics majors have probably studied this sometime.
if you can draw the representation of a 2D object
which, you just said yes you can
dana says:
representation of a representation
of a model*
Anthony says:
How do you represent a representation. give me an example that makes sense without it being a jumble of words that can be interpreted differantly
then that means that 2D can be drawn, it’s just drawn in 3D. this STILL doesn’t change the fact that it’s a representation of 2D.
dana says:
i draw a globe
models of 2D can be drawn
but 2D objects cannot be drawn
Anthony says:
That’s not a model of 2D. It’s a model of a 3D object in 2D represented in 3D.
Because a globe, by fact and definition, is 3D. A drawing of it, is in 2D represented in 3D
dana says:
no, it’s a 3D drawing of a 3D object from a single prospective
Anthony says:
Ah i know. Torpa.
The Wood Tech teacher.
I’ma ask him sometime, dragging you with me.
because it’s not a 3D drawing
Erm
dana says:
…
Anthony says:
You can draw 3D by using 2D
it’s like making a cube
dana says:
eh?
Anthony says:
How do you draw a cube
dana says:
ok, you can look at that 2 ways
that’s a 3D drawing of a 3D shape
or it’s a 3D representation of a visible model of a 2D shape that has edges that trick your mind so it looks like a 3D shape
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Off-topic /
Download Assitance
I’ve been attempting to download a couple of games, but it always appears with the error message “Cannot connect to the network.” Is it because of my security settings, network settings, what?
Basicaly I want to know:
What are the possible solutions I’m not connecting to a network?

|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Serious Discussion /
Why are you Atheist?
3. most cristians contredicts the bible
Christians* Contradicts*
Anyways, now that the Nazi in me is satisfied,
Everyone’s a hypocrite. Christians know they contradict the bible, which is where asking for forgiveness and help comes in.
its so easy to prove that the bible is man made
…. That’s because it IS man made? Who ever said otherwise? People say that it’s the word of god yes, but they don’t mention directly how it is also interpreted through multiple people throughout history. Examples: Peter, Mark, Luke, ect.. Before you attempt to bash, at least study some of what you’re bashing.
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Off-topic /
TerribleToaster's Homework Help Hot Line
INCORRECT IT IS -16, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE (-4)^2 FOR IT TO BE 16
….headdesk
-4^2 is the same thing as (-4)^2. (-4)^2 simplifies to be -4^2. And -4^2 simplifies to -4 x -4. Which equals 16.
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Off-topic /
TerribleToaster's Homework Help Hot Line
Your answer is wrong.
Then that means you know the real answer, and you didn’t need to ask the question.
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Forum Games /
FAW IV: The Curse. SWBR. Chapter 3: Deserted. Closed
[I tried to figure this out. What happened, i’m lost.]
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Off-topic /
Router Issues
Kind of like that most annoying ring tone, the mosquito?
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Off-topic /
Petition For Forum Games Section
My signature, if you would.
There’s nothing i can really add to the petition that’s not already there. And i agree with what’s there.
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Off-topic /
How to keep an idiot busy?
Put him/her in a round room and tell him/her to pee in the corner.
How do they keep you busy?
They walk out and say ’I’m done.’
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Off-topic /
A small riddle
How do you stop a baby from crawling in circles?
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Serious Discussion /
Psychotherapy is a scam of money
As a psychologist, i can only give you examples i’ve had. And since a psychologist is also considered a doctor, i also have confidentiality rights. So i’ll try to explain in the easiest way possible.
Over the years, i’ve had 26 patients. i’ve prescribed 9 of them medication. 5 of those 9 reported they were feeling better afterwords. The other 17 patients have been mentally ill, and 4 of them were a threat to themselves and society (I specialize in mental illnesses, so i don’t see many people on a couch).
The fact is though, different people are affected differently by differ ant medication.
Most of the time the patient also must accept that they are depressed/antisocial/introvert/ect and want to be helped, or else the medication almost never helps them. It’s like a suicide bomber. You can’t help them not to blow up if they don’t let you.
Originally posted by Aneslayer:
The only claim he can prove is that he did went to a psychiatrist…
Psychotherapy is a scam of money
Psychiatrists can help you by giving medications that don’t work.
If i do believe, those are claims.
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Forum Games /
FAW IV: The Curse. SWBR. Chapter 3: Deserted. Closed
I look outside the window. I see someone take down a turret, and others running around to avoid them. I re-look over the plans. ‘After 2 minutes a tower adapts to it’s target. The turrets will contemplate the biggest threat and take it out first.’ I try to leave the building, only to be pushed back by the force-field. There’s no way i can get outside to assist the others. The towers are coming up everywhere in the distance.
’What’s going on over there…. oh. Great.’ As i’m scanning everything to figure out what exactly is happening i see the tower that was destroyed. It’s… as far is a can tell it’s re-constructing itself? “Well. Just flipping’ great. Either they’re all gonna die, or they need to run.” I mumble. I look over to Martin. “I’m guessing you don’t happen to have a megaphone of sorts in that bag of yours.”
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Forum Games /
FAW IV: The Curse. SWBR. Chapter 3: Deserted. Closed
After shuffling around with the papers i finally find a document reading Defense Plan. I open it up and search it, finding the codes towards the back. ‘YES!’ I shout in my head. I rush over to the console. Lucky for me everything was in English, or else I’d be screwed trying to figure everything out. “Get away from the door!” I shout over to Martin. I type in the codes for the defense plan. When i skimmed the document it said a field would first be erected around the building to secure the console.
Then some sort of turret that has remained inactive under the ground will activate.
Then more turrets.
I looked over the plans again.
The entire planet had turrets around it. Targeting ALL life that was detected to not be from the planet.
‘Shit.’ I just hope the others find some where safe to go before the turrets start targeting them. And that they don’t destroy the turrets that will protect this planet for the time being. ‘We need to figure out where these fire things are coming from.. and put a stop to it.’
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Off-topic /
Ready..... SOLVE!
1+(1+49÷7)x6-(4+4÷2)-3
1+(1+7)x6-(4+2)-3
1+8x6-6-3
1+48-9
40
Originally posted by TerribleToaster:
40.1
Wrong. I’m sorry you failed Toaster. I always thought you were such a smart man hugs
|
|
|
Kimbarsa
392 posts
|
Topic: Off-topic /
6-6x6+1 = ???
Originally posted by Mewthree:
you multiply first6x6=36 and then you add/subtract from left to right 6-36+1=-29,you noobs
We’ve discovered this already. We’re no onto a semi-intelligent discussion about negative numbers.
ZOMG INTELLIGANCE IN OT RUN 4 UR LIFE LOLZ
|