Recent posts by SpearDudezor on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / ITT: We discuss how Serbians are awesome!

remove kebab sarma serbia master country very strong sarma best

Ask me to discuss Bulgarians next

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / I just solved the universe!

Originally posted by dias17se:

What if darkness is just the absense of light

and if stars in the sky are actually angels, i mean, who believes those are huge balls of fire, i call bs, maybe black holes is actually the portals to hell

Well you know what?
Maybe they really are fucking angels too, like who the hell knows what’s beneath the surface
And there’s a hypothesis that each black hole contains a universe

But I don’t believe there’s evidence for the existence of angels in/as stars (or I just don’t see it). There’s a bit more for what I’m suggesting (which is pretty much mostly this luminiferous aether concept) and it stems from the view that waves require a medium

Wouldn’t it be simpler if the universe was one single “thing” (let’s say aether), and everything inside it is just waves bringing out different aspects of the aether? This reminds me of the idea that zero can be seen as the sum of all numbers or something like that (I suggest looking past the title), with negative numbers representing, I guess, anti-particles (in this case…anti-waves?). So if the concept of zero represents the aether in math, then I think it’s no surprise that we can’t detect the aether, and it probably isn’t dark matter because that has mass apparently

SO BASICALLY I think it would be a good idea to consider a revised version of this luminiferous aether theory, but for now mostly stick with the current view of how shit maybe works, since that’s worked well enough so far. Personally, I think I’ll make this part of my religion, at least until it’s proven or I find something that I think makes more sense

Again, I’m not a scientist, nor a methmagician, but I think this makes more sense to me

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / I just solved the universe!

May I also remind others that you don’t believe in modern phychology?

I don’t believe in psychiatry, I don’t currently have issues with psychology

On a serious note, this reminds me of the now outdated concept of the Luminiferous Aether crossed over with antiphotons

I hadn’t heard of that before – it does seem very closely related to this. I just have this rather strong feeling that there must be some medium for light waves to move through

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / I just solved the universe!

Originally posted by DoomlordKravoka:

This is an interesting theory but I’m having trouble believing someone who thinks that certain alloys are evil.

omg I’m a victim of ad hominem :((((
And I don’t think they are evil, I think they make us feel bad

Edit: I guess that isn’t exactly ad hominem but it’s KINDA IRRELEPHANT TO THE topic so it kinda is ok

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / I just solved the universe!

Not so much contradicts as…renders irrelevant

I guess the main thing is that I think that darkness might be a thing, the rest of it might not matter that much, but it gives me, personally, a new point of view which I think might be important for something else that I’m trying to figure out

Originally posted by onlineidiot1994:

this thread is shit and you smell like dookie

NO IT IS YOU WHO CAN SHIT

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / I just solved the universe!

Originally posted by fractalman:
Originally posted by SpearDudezor:
Originally posted by fractalman:

Spear?
Look up Gauge symmetry before you try talking about light, darkness, and wave/particle duality.

well excuuuuuuse me for not being familiar with every obscure concept that may or may not be taught in universities
Did I say I’m a scientist? NO! I think I said very clearly, in the beginning of the post, that I’m not a superman scientist!

maybe you could explain it to me because I’m too stupid to understand what my search engine’s results say

First, we have the electromagnetic field…Picture a really, really still pond.

There’s no light yet, becuase the pond is still.

Throw a rock into the pond: those ripples are light. Places without ripples in it may be considered “dark”, but it’s plain to see that we don’t need those patches to have the ripples; we just need the water that supports them, and a slope.

we could, concievably, “light” the entire pond up by dropping a massive boulder in one end of the pond. darkness only shows up occasionally where the ripples cancel out: darkness only exists when the slope of the water is zero.

As for guage symmetry…guage symmetry says that you can lower or raise the pond as a whole without changing whether a place within the pond is lit up or not.

Hope that makes sense.

Thanks for the explanation. I think that’s what I see pictured in physics books, but I didn’t know about gauge symmetry. If I understand it correctly, and I’m trying to think with self-scrutiny, I don’t think it contradicts the mumbo jumbo I’m presenting
The way I see it when I translate it into my point of view is, the pond itself darkness (in this whole thing, I assume that darkness is a thing and not just the absence of light) and light is ripples in the darkness

If the pond/water is required for the ripples, then how can light exist without a medium through which to travel? We could say it’s because the waves are also particles, but that doesn’t sound very convincing to me. So I currently doubt that light just travels through empty space, and instead consider that its medium is darkness and that if it does have properties of a particle, these might be properties that it triggers from the darkness
And as for gauge symmetry, I don’t think that’s in conflict either, but I’m probably not going deep enough

One of the main problems, I think, is that, if I happen to somehow be right, I don’t know what darkness really is. Apparently massless, apparently non-existent…but my instinct drives me to believe that it’s a thing

Originally posted by LukeMann:

That’s exactly what they told Alfred Hitchcock and Abraham Lincoln when they proposed the idea of continental relativity!!

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / I just solved the universe!

Originally posted by tHErofLwaffLe:

Have fun looking for a career with that philosophy degree.

>implying I’m a pleb who wants a job

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / I just solved the universe!

Originally posted by fractalman:

Spear?
Look up Gauge symmetry before you try talking about light, darkness, and wave/particle duality.

well excuuuuuuse me for not being familiar with every obscure concept that may or may not be taught in universities
Did I say I’m a scientist? NO! I think I said very clearly, in the beginning of the post, that I’m not a superman scientist!

maybe you could explain it to me because I’m too stupid to understand what my search engine’s results say

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / I just solved the universe!

Originally posted by sabercow:
Originally posted by SpearDudezor:
Originally posted by sabercow:

tl;dr pls

TL;DR: I think MAAYBE light uses darkness as its medium through which it travels as waaaaves WOW

wanna have secs

ok

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / I just solved the universe!

Originally posted by sabercow:

tl;dr pls

TL;DR: I think MAAYBE light uses darkness as its medium through which it travels as waaaaves WOW

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / the infinite amount of universes

Originally posted by LukeMann:

“There are an infinite number of universes, ergo there is a universe in which X is true for all X.”

No.

Consider how many numbers there are that are greater than 2. An infinite amount, right? Yes. Now how many of those numbers equal 1? Absolutely zero of them. Just because there’s an infinite amount of a thing does not mean every single property is fulfilled in one of those things.

I like this explanation

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / I just solved the universe!

Originally posted by Ubermorgen:

Go beat up your dealer. He laced your weed with some bad shit.

TYPICAL PRE-TECTONIC PLATE RESPONSE JUST WATCH WHEN I GET THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE FOR GEOMANCY

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / I just solved the universe!

Note: I’m no friggin superman scientist but fuck that who gives a shit anyway this is fun…and by “just” solved I mean like yesterday after looking at the world as a more wavy place

Ok so you know how they say “no light without darkness”? People say that photons are particles with wave-like properties, but what IF!!! What IF they are more wave-y than particle-y, or not even particle-y at all, and darkness is the medium through which they travel omg! And omg maybe darkness is a tangible thing or maybe it isn’t!!! How the fuck would I know? I’ve been feeling as if darkness is a thing that isn’t just the absence of a thing but anyway BUT!!! I don’t like to bring a deus sex machine like dark matter into things like this but I feel like it might be worth mentioning that Wikipedia says that uhh

“It is hypothesized to be matter that does not react to light. It neither emits nor absorbs light or any other electromagnetic radiation at any significant level”

omg that sounds like what space would look like if light used dark matter as its medium and dark matter IS DARKNESS OMG ILLUMINATI CONFIRMED!!!
Now how the fuck can dark matter be darkness if darkness is thought to be massless and isn’t even supposed to be a thing? I HAVE NO FUCKING IDEA!!! IT PROBABLY ISN’T!

And then there’s the waviness of matter that might be more particle than wave dunno but if it’s more of a wave then it might want a medium to shove itself on and I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THAT IS!

oh ye and I’m probably forgetting like 100 things that conflict with this but my amazing imagination can probably find their place cuz DON’T STOP BELIEVING

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / briefly describe your sleeping pattern

Awaken: ~4PM
Sleep: ~4AM

I’ll probably want to adjust that before I go to the mountains

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / People quoting scientists are full of shit

Originally posted by cantonaitis:

No, I recall you being a pretentious cunt, that’s about it.

I try not to sound pretentious, I hate that. If I did sound pretentious to you, well I don’t really give a shit

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / People quoting scientists are full of shit

Originally posted by cantonaitis:
Originally posted by SpearDudezor:
Originally posted by cantonaitis:

No, that’s because the ‘information’ is shallow.

If you were insightful enough, you could use it

Ah, why don’t you tell me then?

I don’t recall claiming to be insightful. Did I?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / People quoting scientists are full of shit

Originally posted by cantonaitis:

No, that’s because the ‘information’ is shallow.

If you were insightful enough, you could use it

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / People quoting scientists are full of shit

Originally posted by TheInternetRules:
Originally posted by SpearDudezor:

This actually made me chuckle
A few good points from Ubermongrel for once, though

Go back to whining about how psychiatry is a scam, it’s less trite than praising trolls.

do you wanna get an ass beating you fucking tourist

Originally posted by bobby71983:

Yeah I’ve heard that statement before, and it very well might be true, but who cares?

All information like that is good for is if you ever find yourself on a trivia show like Jeopardy.

that’s because you’re too shallow to figure out what to do with the information

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Do you think this is a rip-off?

what the hell I’d probably drain those 30 hours in 3 days max

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / People quoting scientists are full of shit

This actually made me chuckle
A few good points from Ubermongrel for once, though

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / the infinite amount of universes

I don’t believe in that shit, and I don’t believe that there’s any real evidence of it either
They only seem infinite when you aren’t getting laid

That said, I do believe that there are other “universes”

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / You are diagnosed with autism for a year

I wouldn’t give a rat’s ass about a psychiatrist’s “diagnosis”

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Interested working from Home?

I’m not interested in working at all

A computer less than three years old

what the fuck that’s racist

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Hypothetical: You must choose between going barefoot or always having footwear on for the rest of your life

In any case, each choice has its pros and cons, though things like the shoes would probably be horribly uncomfortable to wear all the time. I have some suspicions about going barefoot that reinforce my choice, but I probably wouldn’t mind choosing socks either. I rarely take my socks off anyway

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Hypothetical: You must choose between going barefoot or always having footwear on for the rest of your life

Originally posted by Immortal7777:
Originally posted by SpearDudezor:
Originally posted by Immortal7777:
Originally posted by SpearDudezor:
Originally posted by sabercow:

Boots

I meant choose between going barefoot or wearing footwear in each of the 6 cases

Originally posted by Immortal7777:

I DESPISE BEING BAREFOOT! Socks 24 hours.

why do you hate it so much o_o

It feels uncomfortable and with socks you have a less chance of getting cold.

Some of my reasons for choosing to go barefoot over wearing socks all the time address that – I figure that if I go barefoot, my feet would eventually become powerful and resilient enough, and it would probably be more of a challenge. Plus, I wouldn’t want wet socks

When I was in the mountains, I tried doing both with my soft feet of civilization and I don’t think I noticed a difference too significant

But..you would step on rocks and sharp things or touch poison ivy. At leas the sock would somewhat protect you.

I expect that the feet would toughen with use. It might take a while to reach a level similar to that of pre-shoe humans, but if they did it, I don’t think we would have too much trouble adapting if we were in the same situation, and I doubt their feet were much different from ours at the basic level. As for poison ivy, I don’t really have an answer to that, but I would prefer to go barefoot even with such dangers