Topic: Forum Games /
[MAFIA WIN] Jack-o'-Lantern
Alright. Analysis time.
Seems to have read through the mafia quite well since replacing adv0 and has a generally good idea of the game so far from what I can see. This:
Originally posted by Bluji:
Also, it would pretty much confirm the Praetorian Gourd’s role even if there was a counterclaim — lynch one of the two, if that one flips town, then lynch the other one the day after. Have cocoa use Night Voider (which if I understand correctly stops all night actions) to stop the nightkill — even if the mafia would kill cocoa, they’d still be down one member, because cocoa has the passive Bomb ability.
is a good idea. Maybe town.
Good activity, seems to participate and have good reasoning in most cases, however, I’ve been sceptical of BC for a while, since day 2, in fact.
He used strangely justified reasons against me (retracted RNG taken as a lead?). Not answering the second RQS questions I can let slip. While self-preservation is not scummy, this statement:
Well, since everyone else (all of one other person) is unvoting occooa, I suppose I have to do the same, or risk being bombed as his only voter.
was worded strangely. Hamuka mentioned this at the start of day 4. It looks an act of getting out of the danger zone, but seems like BC would have preferred to stay in that zone were it not so dangerous, rather than actually following anyone else.
Is still somewhat suspicious of occooa for, again, suspiciously justifed reasons, given that she’s most definitely the Jackfruit.
Most definitely confirmed Jackfruit. Town-aligned.
Slightly less posts than others; perhaps inactivity, perhaps lurking, perhaps I’m just wrong (I think I counted the posts right); but when he does post, they are long and detailed analyses that seem well justified and thought out. The slight inactivity is the only real scumtell but I’ve already justified why I’ll let that slip. Town-like.
Someone else can do the analysis of me.
Claimed VT. I should probably know what that means but I don’t. Someone can explain it to me. Anyway, it would be a town alignment, I know that much. Has had good activity, providing good-ish responses.
I didn’t really see his protectiveness of BC as suspicious. I won’t rule it out as a possibility, but it doesn’t look like much. It was only three sentences that seemed to be town-helping rather than scum-saving. Although I am suspicious of BC, spike could have been overanalysed and the town-helping/scum-saving mixed around. And he has also commented on the contradictions from BC, so maybe town.
I’d like to see this carryout… but im not retracting my vote for this
That strikes me as a weird answer. So, you want to see this happen, but do something that stops it from happening?
I really don’t want to/feel the need to answer this RQS
Small FoS right there. RQS is a nice way to gather information about people, so not wanting to answer them is a scummy thing. Though, you did answer the RQS after all…
This analysis from hamuka was good and provides good points. Has had good activity (a bit less for day 4 so far) and has provided good responses, but these ones hamuka analysed were weird. Also, as mentioned above, Leb could be overanalysing spike’s protective nature of BC. Not really sure at the moment. But…
After this analysis I’m going with two people I’m at least slightly suspicious of: BC and Leb. BC seems to be the more suspicious at this time, and as I already mentioned, I have been sceptical of him since day 2. Because of the reasoning stated above and in the analyses (of myself and of others), I’m gonna go with: