Recent posts by Zzzip50 on Kongregate

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Yes, have you really asked him to post?

Devourer never acts extraordinarily scummy, so you can’t really be waiting for that. Any good mafia player knows enough circular logic to prove any charge on him incorrect.

I don’t know why nobody else finds this post spectacular. In combination with the arguements he had with me, it essentially translates to my two capitalized rants. When I asked that he give more discussion, you basically told me “He is scum. He will never display any more scum tells. We should kill him now.”

I don’t know if you are dying to kill him or not. In our arguements though, thats what it translates to. And of course the spectacular statement above.

No, you seemed quite serious. You even stated you were quite serious (instead of instilling conversation) when asked by Devourer.

I am going to lynch Sabin, starting from now, whenever there is a 24 hour gap in posting. As long anyone has anything to say, the day will go on.

This does not say you switched your suspicions. All I got from the entire post where the above quote came from was something like “Guys, I don’t feel Sabin is really a scummy guy. I hope he plays better and shows he is actually town. BUT since the majority of you guys want to kill him, I’ll default lynch him if there’s no more discussion, instead of devourer.”

And my stance had been quite clear from the start, which is pretty much the same as everyone else. Yet you still give me the joke explanation in our arguements. I don’t understand.

And yes, I do know you’ve been talking about different people being suspicious, but Devourer you see, is the only one you actually pushed for a lynch. And not just to instill conversation, as I said before, but you were serious in pushing for a lynch. Which, logically, kind of alerted me when I saw the giant question thing and decided to start arguing with you.

No, my suspicions are not coming off of you. I thought you were being serious about lynching Devourer, I don’t know why this reason was never brought up till now, and I still don’t like the kind of response I got from our arguements.

Woops, I didn’t see that entire post by Jask. This isn’t a cover up, I would have responded to that post if I saw. Ill do that as soon as I finish this post.

I said that as mafia I have the urge to do so, a lack of interest. But in actuality I force myself to do so anyways, and I hypnotize myself into eliminating large scum ambitions and hypnotize myself into believing I’m town so I’m more transparent. I’m not going back on my words.

(Just disregard the two slip ups with Jask and the x list)

Sorry, I’m not devoted to this game to the point that I’m going to read through Sabin/Walford’s games. So I’m getting that typical Sabin doesn’t show much interest in the game as townie. His usual actions are just bandwagon, and leave. Ok, this doesn’t really help me much, because he is clearly interested in the game now and his behavior is starting to evolve from just your meta analysis. I’m particularily disturbed by how he’s very aggressively attacking myhome after apparently encouragement from your own analysis, he goes all out on myhome.

Walford…he needs a prod.

So does Devourer, efar, and all the other guys.

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Well, you did just FoS him. I don’t really understand your purpose of the FoS if you don’t believe myhome is exhibiting scumtells lol?

Sorry for short response, I’m getting tired now and I’m not going to do my typical point by point analysis.

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Lol what is going on.

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Zzzip: Well, it’s something to consider D2…

What do you mean?

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Bringing out a WIFOM argument to defend Devourer? You said “he will slip up sometime or the other”. What if the joke was a slip? You can excuse nearly every scumtell as a joke or an oversight. Doesn’t stop it being a scumtell.

I looked up WIFOM. Basically its circular logic.

Let me take a look at the entire basis of your arguement

FoS: Adeeb because I can.

First of all, no, you are wrong, you can’t excuse the majority of scumtells as jokes or oversights. That’s bad logic.

Your entire claim is that joking is a subtle scumtell. Now, in all the games I’ve played, joking is never a scumtell except in that stupid time where everyone wagoned on Jaume the Jester. Your explanation is that joking causes people to jettison their initial paranoias about a person. It would be nice if you could provide me some instances in which Devourer, as mafia, used a trick so simple that alone turned the tide of paranoia. I’ve never seen this happen, unless the joke is quite elaborate and sharp, then in which case it usually gets some people, including me, to like that guy. Which is the truth, joking by itself means nothing. I guess it can be what you guys call a null tell. In addition, I can see where his joke is coming from as I was about to do the same to mess with your system. This doesn’t mean I’m calling him town. It means that we need more discussion from him.

This, I think is a reasonable suggestion, was rudely kindly rejected on the basis of “NOOOO YOU STUPIDHEAD, WE NEED TO KILL HIM NOW!!! HE IS WAY TOO GOOD OF A PLAYER AND HE WILL NOT DROP ANY MORE SCUMTELLS AND HE WILL USE HIS CIRCULAR LOGIC TO CONVINCE US ALL HE IS TOWN. IM TELLING YOU, I KNOW HE IS SCUM, BELIEVE ME, HANG HIM NOW!!!” (Please refer to original text for 100% accuracy)

That, I believe, is quite a series of bad logic. Not to mention the spectacular eagerness and hastiness that it suggests. This feeling of eagerness I feel is compounded by how you just ignore all of our attempts to tell you that you have no lead, despite unable to justify why you have a lead. That is in fact, one of my scumtells in that questionaire.

There was this other point that I wanted to bring up but it slipped out of my mind…

Anyways, what is this WIFOM arguement that I brought up? I really don’t understand.

However, I’m going to ask that Devourer state his opinions on everything that has happened so far and on everyone. I think this is a much more reasonable solution and will let me pin exactly if he is town or not.

Sorry for this wall of text, I wanted to get everything I wanted to say about this relationship between Adeeb and Devourer because I think its quite illogical, absurd, and honestly, I don’t understand the motivation behind the strong push for Devourer to be lynched from a pro-town perspective.

Yes I am saying I suspect Adeeb now on the basis of weird eagerness for this amount of time on something so insubstantial, and bad logic to support the eagerness, in addition to partially disregarding peer interjection.

If you have the liberty to mention that my suspicion on little evidence is ‘baseless’, I will take the liberty to mention that your suspicion on little evidence is ‘baseless’. And like Sabin’s hypocrisy tag, bolding ‘highly speculative’ doesn’t make the evidence moot. You even convinced Jask to place efar on top of his suspect list.

I had no suspicion. I bolded it to tell you that its non existant, that I’m not going to push it, and that if you do, its quite stupid, because from that you can’t determine anything. So what evidence was there. It’s not the same as the hypocrisy tag. Stop pushing me on this issue, I’m already annoyed and I said I’m not going to include unnecessary details next time. I made Jask suspicious of efar on that detail alone? Oh no, he shouldn’t have. But I’m sure it isn’t alone, as my main point was on lurking while being actively posting, although I really liked it if it wasn’t at the top of his list.

Your suspicions are still baseless though, whatever form of retaliation you just had there really didn’t change that.

I don’t have the inactives on my X-List? You are mixing up the X List with my second question. His posting patterns? You admitted that he has only one substantial post in the whole thread.

Ok, I completely messed the X-list up after rereading it. I still mean the same thing though, the default person who dies.

You don’t get it. What you are pulling out is Suspicion, half disguised as a policy. If people go for efar, you can go ‘yes, I was suspicious of him earlier, so FoS efar". If no one takes your bait, you can go “yes, I always suggested policy lynching efar”. I am 75% sure, by now, that it wasn’t your intention, but I am taking that into consideration.

No that isn’t my intention and I’ve explained why I would not go into that speculative detail I myself mentioned. I’m going to make it clear that I don’t like to lynch lurkers, because lurking by itself is null to me. However, lurking while actively reading the thread and posting is suspicious, but still very below my preference, which is trying to get discussion in the thread, since that is where solid evidence comes in. And lurking by itself to me is not solid, which is why I will not try to vote lurkers unless about 4 days have passed without anyone contributing anything of use, and the lurkers continue contributing nothing, which is quite rare. So no, my intentions never pushed efar to be an actual lynch candidate.

Efar deserves a prod/modkill/replacement now though, BC.

Because he dropped down to inactivity, all my thoughts on him disappears.

Maybe we play mafia differently. As scum, I read posts with much more care than as town. As a townie, you will find scumtells in everything (good townies know to ignore false leads), as scum, you have to dig it out of mountains of text.

As town I read quite detailed to figure out thought patterns. As mafia I hypnotize myself into believing I’m town. So as both I read and post a lot.

Have you really never played with Walford, for example? He appeals to emotion in like every game he has played. Appealing to emotion is a scumtell in context of meta, and against Sabin’s meta, it is a null tell.

Nope, at least, not in a year. Neither with Sabin. In fact, if you could give me a complete idea of how they usually play, that would be great, as they both confuse me at the moment.

Topic: Forum Games / General Thread

Originally posted by developous:

Originally posted by yiu113:

Originally posted by developous:

The way your mind works, you may as well add a law: “No stats on rpgs” for all I care. Won’t play an rpg with even ONE complex stat….

It’s more of you give fifteen seemingly random stats that don’t have an explanation of what they do. A lot of RPGs in the forums involve stats, but they are always explained.

yes, I am horrible with that.

Bleh. May as well defy the laws and make a wargame.

o2, en, corn, complexity, hazmat, nexus, etc.

I have never understood what a single of these recurring stats means or their purpose in your games.

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Originally posted by Sabin7:

I am now going to read some verses which are intended to
indicate my feelings at the moment of leaving this world. If set to music they may be rendered very effective. The idea is that of a child babbling to his mamma and his papa. I wrote it this morning about ten o’clock:

I am going to the Lordy, I am so glad,
I am going to the Lordy, I am so glad,
I am going to the Lordy,
Glory hallelujah! Glory hallelujah!
I am going to the Lordy.
I love the Lordy with all my soul,
Glory hallelujah!
And that is the reason I am going to the Lord,
Glory hallelujah! Glory hallelujah!
I am going to the Lord.
I saved my party and my land,
Glory hallelujah!
But they have murdered me for it,
And that is the reason I am going to the Lordy,
Glory hallelujah! Glory hallelujah!
I am going to the Lordy!
I wonder what I will do when I get to the Lordy,
I guess that I will weep no more
When I get to the Lordy!
Glory hallelujah!
I wonder what I will see when I get to the Lordy,
I expect to see most glorious things,
Beyond all earthly conception
When I am with the Lordy!
Glory hallelujah! Glory hallelujah!
I am with the Lord.

xD

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Everytime Sabin posts bells go off in my head. I don’t think I need to explain my points on his last post that made me confirmed on my own thoughts, although myhome covered most of them quite well. I have a few people I am suspicious about, which the significant ones I’ll explain soon, and the minor ones I’ll leave alone so to let them accumulate slipups. However, my most suspicious lead is Sabin, I think be is a good vote for today.

FoS: Sabin

This puts the count of Sabin to 5. 4 more votes would be majority. I will leave it up to Adeeb to decide whether he wants to hammer him now or to wait for more discussion, get more info, and hammer him at majority. I would really prefer it if you hammer him now though, as I think the case of Sabin is pretty much closed according to what I’ve read on the thread about him, what he wrote, and how he can’t even defend himself anymore. And also if you drag it on I think the majority of the people are going to die from boredom and this game will die too, and I want to see how well I can really play mafia when I’m serious :/

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

I will provide my reads for everyone in this game soon, but first I would like to present my case of the hot topic of Sabin.

Originally posted by Sabin7:

I agree with walfordking. At the very least, he should have confirmed. FoS Helltank /hypocrisy

This is his first post. Here I feel the strongest possibility is that Sabin has not read the thread at all at that point. If he had, he would have noticed the giant question by AN, the RQS, and the discussions.

Here I notice a tendency from self experience: When I’m playing as Mafia, I don’t read the thread as much. Sometimes I skip walls of text I usually scan. Sometimes I skip conversations. Sometimes an entire page or two. That’s because when you are mafia, you don’t need the info or think as hard from those posts. You already know who everyone is.

I’m not stating this as a certainty, just a very major bell in my head, and made me look into his posts.

The other thing I want to mention is the hypocrisy tag. I don’t know if it makes any of you feel this way, but to me it feels like a defensive masking. It makes me feel initially to take the post less seriously and considerably and even slightly comical. I’m not sure if this is intentional, and I don’t know if it makes any of you feel the same way, so I’m not going to push this front.

However, he simply bandwagoned on a clearly stupid reason, the first thing he saw. You have to be really stupid and clueless, imo, to just do that. This is why I think he has a minor chance of being a VI.

Originally posted by Sabin7:

1. A decent amount, enough to post once or twice a day.
2. I would be willing to trueclaim Hero, but that’s not an option since I’m not the Hero.
3. Scum will not care about WHO is voted for, just that someone is killed.
4. His own suspicions should take priority. Of course, he should watch everyone’s actions to see who is suspicious.
5. Nah, Adeeb is resourceful.
6. A man who is innocent needs a defense no more than a fresh-pressed white button-down shirt needs laundering.
7. I’m mildly suspicious of RaceBandit, but I feel like he’s being humorous in his answers more than anything.

Also, if anyone gives a better reason for voting somebody other than Helltank on day 1, I’ll gladly consider. /hypocrisy

Unlike others, I don’t feel that the contradiction with Race and Helltank matter much. I feel that he’s telling us that he had a initial vibe with Race, but after rereading it Sabin feels that nothing is wrong with Race.

Originally posted by Sabin7:

@Myhome: I did actively mention my outright hypocrisy.

Also, all the walford said also applies. The thing is, this is the usual Mafia Day 1, wherein there really isn’t anything to go off in the slightest other than random paranoia.

This shows to me he either hasn’t been reading the thread/masking and defending his vote behind a universally accepted reason. If its the first, then he is a bad player with a major chance of being scum (see my “not reading thread” idea above). If its the second he’s scum.

Originally posted by Sabin7:

The thing of it is, now I DO have a good reason to vote for Helltank. I have no strong evidence that people will unvote me if I were to change my vote, and therefore there is no reason to unvote Helltank, which would put me at a disadvantage. By holding a gun to my head, you have only given me all the more cause to amorously continue my voting, because self-preservation takes hold regardless of whether I was Pro-Town (which I am) or Scum. And in fact the only thing remaining for me to do is to apathetically await my execution and mock you when your suspicions have been proven false. Basically, your own suspicion removes the possibilty of my behavior being suspicious. QED.

Rapidly going defensive on a little pressure. Thats another scumtell from my own experiance: When I’m mafia I feel much more paranoid and pressured then normal.

First of all, thats bad logic. Nobody is out to kill you yet. Holding onto Helltank just makes people want to kill you more. As said above, the pressure from being scum kept me from seeing clearly a few times myself. However, it can also be a result of bad play, as stated many times before.

Second, I notice the “Haha, I’ll laugh at you when you kill me because you are wrong!” This is clearly a last ditch appeal to emotion. I don’t know about the rest of you, but whenever I see this I vote that guy because in y experiance around 7 times out of 10 that guy is a bad mafia player, but mafia nonetheless.

Finally,

Originally posted by myhome16:

And in fact the only thing remaining for me to do is to apathetically await my execution and mock you when your suspicions have been proven false.

You could, here’s a thought, attempt to convince me why you are not guilty.

My current conclusion, when taking in all the information I’ve derived, is that you are a bad player exhibiting major newbie scum tells. Therefore, I believe you are a bad mafia player, but mafia nonetheless.

However, I don’t like to use my vote until I am fully certain, I would really like for you to clarify. And cut it out with talking about how you’ll be laughing at me when we wrongfully kill you, because realize town doesn’t like to just kill people who act weird, we want to deduce alignments.

Topic: Forum Games / Delta Complex (OOC + Product Requests)

Lol @ Stone.

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Originally posted by walfordking:

Well @ V0idGuard, I’ve got no other reason yet into voting any one else off.

Originally posted by Sabin7:

@Myhome: I did actively mention my outright hypocrisy.

Also, all the walford said also applies. The thing is, this is the usual Mafia Day 1, wherein there really isn’t anything to go off in the slightest other than random paranoia.

Are you two really so unread on this thread to ignore two replies to you, an explanation of the replies, and another referral of what you just said to the replies and the explanation?

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

:/ I don’t see how I’m copying others to blend in or whatever or make others feel that I’m agreeable. I think I came up with my own original information /:

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Also, something about catering, yeah this might be embarrassing, but I don’t know what that means, and I can’t find the appropriate definition out of providing food xD Can you please explain what you mean by that?

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Yes, he might be joking in order to remove suspicion, as he is a mafia and wishes to operate in the dark. It can also be everything else. It really means nothing atm.

Which is why you force discussion and wait. Not everyone is perfect and if he is scum, he will slip up sometime or another.

Your reasoning seems to be like this: He joked like everyone else to remove suspicions ond1 when nobody knows anything, but he is too good! WE NEED TO LYNCH HIM NOW BECAUSE HE WILL BURY US ALL IN CIRCULAR LOGIC AND WE WILL NEVER CATCH HIM NOOOOOOOO!

Seriously, admit your suspicion is kind of baseless, and this is what I meant, we need more discussion.

Also on your statement on my analysis, realize that I see very little discussion here, so I’m taking the only two leads I have, and Im trying hard to see any scum possibilities from all of their low post counts, and that’s what I saw. Ok, you don’t see my logic, that’s expected, as my part about speculation was bolded and meant to signal that I’m not being serious and that I’m having fun thinking about different possibilities, not what efar said was speculative, as I think that’s what you are telling me. yes, he only posted ONCE, I can’t obviously derive anything. I even said, I can’t read him and I needed more discussion for him.

As for the policy lynch, let me clarify what I mean. I see that you are saying you are going to lynch a random guy from the X list if there are no discussion. I’ve argued that the inactives who you have on your list should be subject to mod action, not your policy lynch. I’ve described the kind of lurker I do find suspicious. Then in my post on efar I pushed for efar to be on the x list, reasoning based on his posting patterns, completely detached from my speculation.

I’m sorry for my speculation, if any of you misunderstood it and was led astray. I thought I was clear that it was a wild possibility.

Did I clarify myself?

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Also, if anyone gives a better reason for voting somebody other than Helltank on day 1, I’ll gladly consider. /hypocrisy

Well.

Originally posted by Jaskaran2000:

Are you guys retarded for voting Helltank? Like, seriously, what’s the problem with you? He will eventually be modkilled/replaced, stop worrying about his shit. A mafia member is more active towards the game, even if he eventually goes inactive, he will definitely be active on Day 1. Be willing to lynch an active person, even if its at the risk of losing activity, do you want to win this mafia or do you want to prolong this mafia. That’s it for now, will share further thoughts later.

And.

@Walfordking and Sabin’s wagon
Helltank hasn’t even confirmed yet. The other four haven’t even posted yet. These kind of people I think the mod need to deal with in his prod/replace power. Lynches shouldn’t be wasted on these kinds of people.

As I said, if they do come up from the prod, I expect them to be productive however.

Walford and Sabin though, answer the goddamn RQS.

And also the two people I mentioned in my long winded post.

---

Originally posted by Sabin7:

1. A decent amount, enough to post once or twice a day.
2. I would be willing to trueclaim Hero, but that’s not an option since I’m not the Hero.
3. Scum will not care about WHO is voted for, just that someone is killed.
4. His own suspicions should take priority. Of course, he should watch everyone’s actions to see who is suspicious.
5. Nah, Adeeb is resourceful.
6. A man who is innocent needs a defense no more than a fresh-pressed white button-down shirt needs laundering.
7. I’m mildly suspicious of RaceBandit, but I feel like he’s being humorous in his answers more than anything.

Also, if anyone gives a better reason for voting somebody other than Helltank on day 1, I’ll gladly consider. /hypocrisy

Q7, can you give us which posts make you feel mildly suspicious and why? While you are doing that, I’ll be analyzing his posts.

Also, for the rest of you, can you discuss your own thoughts on the two people I had in my post, Walfordking and efar, and my own reads?

This may lead to a lead.

And also may save us for the game tanking of inactivity soon D;

Topic: Forum Games / Plight of Janmare [Strategy game sign ups. One place left]

Name: Zzzip
Gender: Male
Faction: Human
Name of Faction: Country of Lost Borders
Name of Capital: Piedmont
Bio: ???
Color: White

Topic: Forum Games / Plight of Janmare [Strategy game sign ups. One place left]

Name: The Lizars
Gender: Male
Faction: Human
Name of Faction: Elves
Name of Capital: Dwarves
Bio: Undead
Color: White

Topic: Forum Games / Battle Party - Sign Ups + Game

Since this is purely RNG, I’m going to resign now.

Topic: Forum Games / Battle Party - Sign Ups + Game

i fight pls

Topic: Forum Games / Battle Party - Sign Ups + Game

Sign fire

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Why should/shouldn’t I kill Devourer?

No, because he is a productive and good player, and usually active. I’m not sure how much time he’s going to devote to this because of his answer to Q1, but I feel that when he does post, it will be useful. And I don’t find anything criminal about 359 right now.

Also putting my two cents out there that I agree with walford and myhome that Dev shouldn’t be killed partially because I’m afraid of the game tanking if he does gets lynched now xD

In other words, he isn’t a good lynch for today. I would wait until we have more information. I would obviously push for a lynch if he starts acting extraordinarily scummy however. Winning is slightly more important to me then an interesting game.

LET’S HAVE A HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION FOR FUN

I am going to lynch a ‘lurker’ (not much time has passed, so they aren’t really lurkers). Any of the above five will do.

For anyone who isn’t a lurker: Do you think that’s a good idea? Would scum be lurking on D1?

For anyone who is a lurker: Get your butt in the thread.

I feel that lurkers are usually people that don’t know what to do, lazy, or really busy. I don’t think we should kill the lurkers on risk of hitting a townie, instead, I ask that BC remind them to post. It’s been three days, I think 72 hours is a good time to start prodding.

As to your question, the main goal of the scum is to blend in. They can either do that by actively posting, or by lurking and being unreadable. If you ask me, I think its more of a 50% chance either way, so lurking isn’t really a scumtell, nor a towntell. More like nothing.

People who sparingly post but contribute nothing on the other hand is suspicious, imo. Until further useful discussion, these are the kind of people I would want to focus on.

However, I don’t really understand your FoS on Dev. It seems you are taking his FoS, which I interpret as a joke, too seriously.

---

@Walfordking

His first post translates to me as Walford complaining to the rest of us that he is not a very skilled person that gets voted on too often in the beginning, and he’s appealing emotionally by implying that he is town and that he can be a helpful townie. I’m not too sure what to make of this, my immediate thought is “scum appealing to emotion,” but he can be a legitimate townie. I’m a little unwilling to call him a newbie because I know he’s been playing mafia for over 4 years, so I’m sure he has a little experiance xD

Random comment about behemoth, idk whats that about lol.

Now in his second post he is refusing to answer the questions. This isn’t exactly a complete scum tell for me but it is
still interesting. However, I ask that Walfordking please answer these questions as they give us something to discuss about and they aren’t as a carbon copy as you think.

And the rest of his posts I don’t have any solid thoughts on.

In all, a slight scum read.

---

@efar

Stop lurking and post something productive. I know you have time because you’ve looked through and paid attention to it enough to post a reply to BC. Start by answering the RQS please.

“Ok so this is a bloodless night right?”

This is his first post of his two posts. I can’t derive exactly anything solid except that he is interested and surprised that mafia cannot kill that night, which might mean that he is a scum. THIS IS HIGHLY SPECULATIVE.

His second post is no to whether or not roleclaiming should be allowed. I can’t think of anything that would derive a conclusion.

In order to affirm or contradict myself however, I need efar to start posting. Worst comes to worst, I support a policy lynch.

---

@Walfordking and Sabin’s wagon

Helltank hasn’t even confirmed yet. The other four haven’t even posted yet. These kind of people I think the mod need to deal with in his prod/replace power. Lynches shouldn’t be wasted on these kinds of people.

As I said, if they do come up from the prod, I expect them to be productive however.

Walford and Sabin though, answer the goddamn RQS.

---

@The Rest of You.

I have nothing derived for any of you, you are all null reads to me.

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

You know what Silver, I’m actually not sure, I thought I read that BC confirmed it, and I’m sure some people like Adeeb wrote one hero in there, but at the time I looked over the thread, I was practically half dead from exhaustion. So now you gave me a good idea.

BC, can you confirm whether there there are one or multiple Heroes?

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Originally posted by SilverEvil:

Originally posted by Zzzip50:

Originally posted by SilverEvil:

Oh shoot I think he was talking to BC.

Facepalm

Lol u estupido.

I don’t understand BC’s thought process on this lol. A majority say they want roleclaiming, with Adeeb giving us concrete evidence on why roleclaiming should be allowed except for kingmaker, and then someone called Silver just quips that it isn’t a good idea in the beginning with no reasoning, and so BC immediately listens, responds, and decides to take it out. The logic here is apparently “It isn’t a good idea/this idea is useless so why bother having it.” Which is both strange itself, and contradictory to what he said about heroes. The only explanation I have for this is that BC has some kind of inner disgust for roleclaiming that he isn’t telling us.

And I just realized theres only 1 hero lol.

How do you know this?

Oh the description looked a bit ambiguous but after reading through people’s answers, apparently there’s only one guy.

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Originally posted by SilverEvil:

Oh shoot I think he was talking to BC.

Facepalm

Lol u estupido.

I don’t understand BC’s thought process on this lol. A majority say they want roleclaiming, with Adeeb giving us concrete evidence on why roleclaiming should be allowed except for kingmaker, and then someone called Silver just quips that it isn’t a good idea in the beginning with no reasoning, and so BC immediately listens, responds, and decides to take it out. The logic here is apparently “It isn’t a good idea/this idea is useless so why bother having it.” Which is both strange itself, and contradictory to what he said about heroes. The only explanation I have for this is that BC has some kind of inner disgust for roleclaiming that he isn’t telling us.

And I just realized theres only 1 hero lol.

Topic: Forum Games / [Game] Contested Throne Mafia (D1; AdeebNafees is King)

Originally posted by SilverEvil:

Originally posted by BCLEGENDS:

…okay, then, let’s have a vote on it. Who wants to be able to roleclaim, who doesn’t mind, and who definitely doesn’t want roleclaiming?

Role claiming this early isn’t the best idea.

Are you talking about this lol?