Topic: Forum Games /
[MAFIA] Jack-o'-Lantern [Night 3 Deadline: 1 Nov Noon GMT]
So I’m randomly hopping in again.
1. Do you believe in ‘innocent until proven guilty’ or ‘guilty until proven innocent’?
I’m more on the ‘guilty until proven innocent’ side; though, as Darkboy a.k.a. confirmed town said, it’s kind of irrelevant, because in a mafia it’s rare that we have a proof of anything.
2. Any update as to who looks scummy to you at this time?
Honestly? No. BLOODY’s inactivity seems a bit suspicious but I’m not going to act on it for pretty damn obvious reasons.
3. How do you feel about adv0’s modkill and how will you act/respond after it happens?
Ignoring this since it turned out to be a replacement, not a modkill.
4. What is your opinion on occooa’s recent revelation (about the Jackfruit Lantern), and what do you suggest we do?
Eh, I say we let her prove herself. If no PR happens, we can just lynch her since the roleblocker was lynched D2, so it’s obvious that she lied. If PR happens, we have another confirmed townie.
Not voting BLOODY because I don’t want to be a hypocrite,
Not voting occooa because she’s going to try and prove herself this night,
Not voting Bluji because he has yet to post anything meaningful,
Not voting RIM because he’s the most active and town-like person, posting 2 RQS-es,
Not voting Dark because of course I’m not,
Not voting myself because of course I’m not.
Left with BC, spike, and Leb. Let’s analyze their posts.
Didn’t answer RQS questions. FoS due to that.
Aaaand returning to my previous statement that occooa is either VI or SI, I vote occooa again.
While this is a fair point, I think that after occooa promised that she would prove that she’s a Jackfruit by using her PR, you should’ve retracted your vote.
Well, since everyone else (all of one other person) is unvoting occooa, I suppose I have to do the same, or risk being bombed as his only voter.
I don’t know why, but this reasoning just whispers “scum” at me. It doesn’t reek of scum, it just looks like a reasoning I’d use if I was mafia.
Also of note is the fact that BC used mostly short, 2-4 row posts in this mafia, making his posts less analyzable. I don’t feel this is according to his meta, and it strikes me as suspicious. If it is, heads up: that’s a pretty shitty meta.
RQS answers were pretty typical. 3. made me laugh a bit, thanks for lightening the mood.
if cocoa was scum, she would be claiming as a last resort, and she could PR her scum mate.
No she couldn’t, because VC doesn’t have PR ability.
So unless there’s a counterclaim I’ll vote: spikeabc for not retracting his vote.
I was going to FoS Leb because of ignoring BC’s vote on occooa, but I won’t, since he said this after the updated votecount:
Oh, I didn’t notice BC was still voting cocoa too. So FOS him too (in a hurry right now, so no time to analyse which of them is the most suspicious)
Though I feel that a better course of action would’ve been to unvote spike, FoS both of ’em, then analyze and choose who to vote later on instead of voting one of them without analyzing. But meh, good enough.
RQS answers were mostly typical here as well. Well, except this one:
I’d like to see this carryout… but im not retracting my vote for this
That strikes me as a weird answer. So, you want to see this happen, but do something that stops it from happening?
I really don’t want to/feel the need to answer this RQS
Small FoS right there. RQS is a nice way to gather information about people, so not wanting to answer them is a scummy thing. Though, you did answer the RQS after all…
And you know, given that the role is kinda like a bomb
As in, it’s totally a bomb.
Overall, I might’ve left a ton of things out, but I feel I’ve seen enough to decide who to vote.