c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[Suggestion] Ladder Seasons
+1 any enhancement of end game
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[TO DEVS] Making factions smaller
This is only a good idea IF the faction is cut to 25 member limit, and you can link 2 factions and transfer people between them with no LP loss. That way you can have a place for newer members to learn from faction mates. I posted more in depth on this in the devs post a while back.
Strictly smaller for smaller faction’s sake is no good.
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[To Devs] Level Rewards
There are some good points made here, Al has the idea of it there… but the problem is not the same as the symptom.
Right now, new content for higher levels is a symptom.
Think of it this way. The devs should spend time doing…
Options: 1) Make new cards for lvl 175, 200, etc. A good option for most (2 or so new cards for a lot of work from the player [over a year at least]).
2) Make new deck/energy upgrades available. Again, a good option for most (for a new deck slot, maybe you use 10 more cards you wouldn’t have otherwise).
3) Make new tournament (gameplay in general) types that say (common only [not ideal but for example]) that make 400+ cards they’ve already created mean something and have a situation where lower level/new/strategist/bored players can be competitive in different ways. There are so much work they’ve done when in reality we rotate between a couple defense/offense/conquest decks and the rest is not used. We need a way for those to mean something.
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[SPOILER] New Skill - Sunder
Originally posted by lol0lo:
Sundering Ogre without Sunder… >.<
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[To Everyone] Instead of eliminating a card rarity...
Originally posted by stormcommando:
Originally posted by NicolBolas:
now that i see those common uncommon decks, i think its not such a good idea
There are lots of ways to utilize commons/uncommons into tournaments that isn’t strictly “All common or All uncommon”. As seen by many replies in this thread and other tournament threads.
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[To Everyone] Instead of eliminating a card rarity...
Originally posted by Titanium33:
+1
Also it would be REALLY cool if there weren’t only 2h and 24h tournaments. What about implementing a third one, let’s say 12h ?
I (and many others) already suggested there should be more than 2 tournaments running at a time. Hopefully, concerning length, they would have something akin to 2x 2h, 1x 4h, 1x 6h, 1x 12h, 1x 23h. But they would obviously have to make more/different tournament types as I propose in every tournament thread. We have a great game, but we only use 5% of the cards because there is so little gameplay compared to content.
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Standard League Week Four Pairings
Thx for trying to keep it going MSU, thanks to all who fought. It was fun while it lasted.
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Silky's King of Kings Tournament::: Signups
After what Superchar’s tournament turned into with no one wanting to participate weekly or do a knockout once he left, no thank you. Gl to everyone in it.
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
DNA's Retirement Thread
DNA isn’t retired… I predict that he will be back when they make tournaments/end-game play meaningful.
Until then bye good sir
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[To Everyone] Instead of eliminating a card rarity...
Originally posted by Maharid:
I think that only a little amount of players will be really interested in those tournaments even if the idea was proposed a great number of times.
Probably after the release a lot of players will try tem but in some month they will be deserted unless you can get something good for winning them (Shards, Tokens, special cards and so on).
I agree… the reason many players (new players/not WB heavy) don’t like tournaments is because they can only compete if they get a very good draw in a sealed tournament. If you make more types, new players would have a chance to compete and nonWB players would have just as good of a chance at finding a type they like and can win.
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[To Everyone] Instead of eliminating a card rarity...
Originally posted by DaWayne33:
We’ve considered similar tournament ideas. If they get enough support we may go through with implementing them.
Originally posted by DarkBlood1:
Devs already accepted this idea in: [To Devs] New types of standard tourneys, but the problem is that we are still waiting for it (about 4 months), similar to the Raid revamp. :(
Dear DaWayne,
This has been the most common topic for a thread in the past 6 months easily. Right now, people (at least me) complain of a few things: End-Game, Tournaments, Card-Meta power creep. We only really use 20 (maybe ~50 if you have lots of decks pre-set but many of those cards overlap) cards at a time in a game that has 1000+ plus cards you’ve spent a long time doing art for, balancing, testing, etc. You not only need to do new types (please refer to many other threads for great ideas) of tournaments… but you need more running at once. If you had 6 types running at once: A standard (that could only use up to 5 rares), Gold Packs, Standard (with Rush effect), Team Standard (2 players [possibly from one faction?] get W/L record combined), Standard (Common only), and an Auto tournament (Submit your 10 card deck before a certain time and then you get random paired and automatically fight on auto) you would have so many more people interested in playing the game that currently say… “I don’t like grinding/faction wars/tournaments” or whatever that you would have many more players + more people spending WB’s + less complaints for cards being worthless + reasons for factions to be less pointless.
Just so you know, this is a great game, but you severely limit how popular it can be and how much it can be enjoyed by only having the option to play a tournament, grind your energy, or fight in a faction war/conquest. That is good for some… but not most as we see many people get bored of those few options often.
Edit: +1 to all the other tournament ideas offered in this thread.
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Standard League Week Four Pairings
oh 8-0 counting individual battles? hmm not so important to me as both being 4-0 on best 2/3 matches… but as you will. If we have 8/16 people who would do a tournament I would organize it easy enough if needed.
So is anyone remaining interested in a best 2/3 knockout tournament starting as soon as people confirm interest (and MSU okays it)?
Edit: It would probably make most sense to have the top 10 people from the group here that are interested to do the knockout and give masterluke and mafiadriver a bye in round 1 since they were undefeated to date. Just a thought.
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[Hashtag] Free 0hio
Originally posted by p4n1q:
Did 0hio do anything that wasn’t account sharing, botting, or abusing alts?
I’m not in WarBros and not sure what is going on with OOH’s thread, but for the record…
0hio was a top and legitimate player for a long time before anything discussed here occurred.
Also, a nice guy.
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[DISCUSSION] What constitutes enough evidence for Kongregate to intervene?
Don’t other websites just make you fill in a crazy word or combination of letters to probe you’re a person? Seems pretty simple if that works for them.
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Standard League Week Four Pairings
Originally posted by Superchar1998:
YOU MUST CONTACT YOUR OPPONENT AND CORRDINATE WITH THEM A GOOD TIME TO BATTLE
All results must be in by 4/07/2013
if your opponent does not respond to you via pm, pls screenshot it and show to me that you sent at least 3 PMs to them.
xxlinkslayerxx vs. kinokukun
SeventhStory vs. mafiadriver
vifzor vs. jimbo_extreme
Thargoid vs. Footballpwn
monkey1130 vs. gorobot
lukerman vs. go525525
fallinsky vs. Jackdaw
Novellean vs. CHAOSPIG222
jose919 vs. BurnOne
masterluke vs. c4bomb <== Feature Match! :D
silky192 vs. Xaysh
asd123, stormcommando, hammythepig, dnaimagery, floppynoodles, kodokx have quit
pleasedpig has been replaced by silky192
chop chop bitches
Alright, since Superchar1998 paired people for matches by current record… here is my best attempt to put some records on. Please let me know what’s wrong/right.
8-0 mafiadriver, masterluke
7-1 c4bomb, SeventhStory, Thargoid?, Fallinsky?
6-2 jimbo_extreme?, Footballpwn?, Jackdaw?, vifzor?, Chaospig222?
If anyone else knows their record I’ll try and update this.
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
My 2 cents about what this game was/is/or is going to become
Originally posted by pacachomp:
Hmm. What do you guys think is a decent list of the cards which should absolutely 100% be nerfed?
For me, Pyro Rig, Enrichment Vial, Cyclops, Moya and the other ridiculously high-HP commanders, Warpway, and Sabre.
Other stuff like (TI, Drone, GS) is borderline too imo.
Nerfed Enrichment Vial: Augment some of all 2. 50% chance to augment each card… :)
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
this game should take a break and solve its powercreep problem
Originally posted by synapticon:
The point of Upgrades is to increase the breadth of the metagame, and it’s actually done a pretty great job of that so far. It’s unreasonable to expect every card to be at the exact same power level, largely because you guys are so good at finding new strategies to use with cards. If you want every card to have a pre-defined strategy and power-level, it would actually get boring very quickly. The meta-game will never be stable, static, and balanced, because that would mean rock-paper-scissors and is actually really boring. The meta-game has been, is, and will always be ever-changing. That’s the only way to keep it interesting.
Synap if you think people complain a lot about Upgrades… wait until you rebalance a card and a stat/skill goes down! That’ll be a fun forum day.
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Congrats to the First 100CR Faction
Congrats! But I do have a request… I want some screenshots when anyone tries to take the middle tile :)
Thx and Thx
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
High FR Factions still on the conquest map
Originally posted by jfenz101:
i think u meant FP
I think he did mean FR… Fun Rating? Fly n Ruthless? Friendly Rottweilers?
Nah now that I think about it, you were right after all.
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Buff Righteous Faction with new skills.
Originally posted by masterluke:
Originally posted by c4bomb:
Like Zeit, with your card having swipe and fear… I’m not sure you’re serious about this topic.
And so many things you wrote deterred me from providing any topic related/potentially useful response.
Have a great sunday
Yay, I get to bring this out again:
Originally posted by DaWayne33:
Fun fact about Swipe+Fear – Based on the way it works now the card will still use Swipe and proceed to “Fear” through each unit it tries to attack, making it possible for the unit to attack the Commander (or wall) 3 times… No we don’t plan on making a card with this combination anytime soon.
Thanks masterluke, but I really should’ve phrased it like this… having 2 wait, fear, swipe, flurry 2 3/6… etc ;) = 27 damage on one turn potentially…
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Roleplay?
translation: I think it’s time for a map reset!
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Buff Righteous Faction with new skills.
Like Zeit, with your card having swipe and fear… I’m not sure you’re serious about this topic.
And so many things you wrote deterred me from providing any topic related/potentially useful response.
Have a great sunday
|
|
|
c4bomb
249 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
History of Tyrant
Originally posted by MSUSpartan3096:
Originally posted by c4bomb:
Originally posted by Novellean:
what about dets on the epic Warbond wars. ninjastriker(not spelled that way) is the only one i ever remember from those days, but with out talking about warbond wars / stam refills none of the early history makes sense. IMO
N1njaStr1ker was a huge WB’er, but he came after fishboner1234 who did what ninja did per war… in like 17 wars at once. SO that is all I have to say about that.
Many other huge WB’ers were out there, but it would take a bit of research to compile any definitive list. Just from my experience to name only a few… shadevarr, Dakota337, Lykosis, 0hio, rhuris. All legit when I faced/fought with them. Needless to say that was just the tip as there were probably 50 more just that I was with or against regularly.
You also could glance at my own tl;dr post at the bottom of page 1 in this thread for my brief, subjective take on early faction history with warbond refills.
http://www.kongregate.com/forums/65-tyrant/topics/334824-vote-for-the-best-faction-in-tyrant-history?page=1
The hoschisack could WB with the best of them back in the day. Also, not sure you can put Ohio on that list…no disrespect my friend but I don’t think the WBing you did counts :)
Agreed, Hoschi is also a legend of the WB. I was invited to join C9 after the BO disband (Hoschi and Showza are the two I feel like I remember from C9?, but it’s been a long time) but I wasn’t very active then so I had to pass.
And when I was in BO fighting 0hio in LoA1, his scores seemed high, but legit. Just my take.
|