N7791
46 posts
|
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[DEV] Small conquest suggestion for next week.
Originally posted by JrJetu:
I’m not allocating much more thought to conquest at this time
Then please don’t post your random thoughts here.
- 1
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[DEV] Small conquest suggestion for next week.
Originally posted by JrJetu:
Reading through people’s refutes, I still stand by that this is the right direction. But like like their last update, only one step in a series. Yes, this should be implemented in some sense, but need additional changes along with it.
Please justify, explain, develop, discuss. “Yes ok imo but change something” doesn’t stand as a valid argument. I’m just trying to understand your point of view. How can this be positive for CQ?
Until then, -1.
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[DEV] Small conquest suggestion for next week.
Please stop with that alt thing. It’s off topic. And innocent until proven guilty?
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[DEV] Small conquest suggestion for next week.
Originally posted by mookie314:
6) If you really want some chaos → add “faction war” as a deck slot in CQ. .. so the attacker must beat the other tiles and win a war.
That’s the beginning of a neat idea.
Just discard wars and conquest as they are now.
Fuse CQ and FW once and for all! Make tiles conquestable through faction wars!
: D
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[DEV] Small conquest suggestion for next week.
This might actually lead to more stagnation in an additional way: Factions on the map will strengthen bonds with neighbours and organize defense on their joint borders. Then they will stop conquesting altogether. And wage easy faction wars instead for easier tokens. A game killer.
-1
Please reconsider.
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[DEV] Small conquest suggestion for next week.
Wars don’t require as much organization as Conquest.
I can’t imagine serious conquesting twice a day.
This will mean tile trading, stronger bonds with neighbors, more small factions out of the picture.
What about Loyalty (CQ costs twice as much) and Faction (zero sum) points? Very unfair to conquesting factions.
I don’t see the point of this proposal. Please explain your reasoning.
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[To Everyone] Instead of eliminating a card rarity...
+1 for common and uncommon tournaments.
Spams can be prevented by allowing only one copy of each card.
Still waiting for a completely rewardless PvP duel, where you can challenge specific friends and all, just for fun. PLEASE consider. Thanks!
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
Active Members list
+1.
This is actually of highest priority, because you can’t properly wage a war or conquest without knowing who’s online and who’s not : /
Please implement this common-sense feature soon.
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[Dev] What is best in life?
b) : Are you not going to do that anyway? : /
a) : Taking out shards would further decrease the variety of the game. Some packs for gold, some for shards, some for tokens: all right as it is. Enough boring grinding already thanks to those card upgrades with gold (instead of a one-time buff or upgrade, most of these cards we won’t use anyway). Btw, I’m a heavy patron, but I find that some packs are really overly WB-priced, comparing to gold/shard price, and the said card upgrades don’t help either. Card upgrades + relatively more WB-expensive packs have made me thinking of quitting for the first time actually.
d) : For a few weeks now, I have been unable to open a new tab without Tyrant not liking it at all, forcing a refresh and the opening of tabs in new windows. I’m not the only one with that issue, and that’s the only heavy problem I’m concerned with. Otherwise things are quite pretty already, aren’t they?
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[Dev] What is best in life?
e) Buff instead of Upgrade. I don’t think people voted for this. Or if Upgrade, make it so that we only have to upgrade once. This is really so tiresome. Not even mentionning the Gold mindless grinding.
f) Please make a rewardless PvP duel.
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[DEV] 3/21/2013 New Arena Rating and bug fixes
I would just LOVE to be able to challenge whomever I want (mostly friends and fellow faction members).
A very simple “Challenge Request / Accept / Fight” system, for no reward at all, just fun.
I know I’m not the only one who wants this badly.
Cheers!
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[TO DEVS] Let us see cards we don't have on our profile
Hello.
Not worried about not being able to get the detail of blacked cards (Fansite is there for it).
On the other hand, I would really appreciate to be able to see, in the library, the cards that are already used in decks (blacked out, or showing x0, or even better telling me in which deck they are used).
Thanks!
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[Petition] Make Legendary Upgrade require only 1 copy
Well, next time, please all vote for buffs and not upgrades.
Not that votes count anyway, it seems. : /
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[DEV] 1/25/2013 Card Upgrades Released!
And at least can we have, on the card upgrade page, a hover indicating how many of the upgraded card we have? Thx.
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[to devs] Please add suffix to buffed cards
BUFF+1
But all in favor of that idea, btw, of pack crafting in exchange for a number of cards (as was discussed a few months ago). That should be easily implementable and will please everyone for sure.
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[DEV] Card Upgrade Feature Announcement
Please keep it simple.
Buffing existing cards is the best option.
Crafting new cards using old cards (those thousands we NEVER, EVER use) would be more than welcome.
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[to DEVS] Little usefull improvement
+1 for all, except 2 (leader only).
But the improvement I am most impatient to see is a way to see who in the faction is online right now (like green or red dots in the faction members list). It is so impractical presently.
Also, it would be a nice improvement to be able to copy text in the in-game chat.
Cheers.
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[Dev] Universal Shard rate/cost poll
1.
Question: “new” means “the newest”?
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[Dev] Universal Shard proposal
Universal shards: great.
Cap: 30 seems more realistic.
|
|
|
N7791
46 posts
|
Topic: Tyrant /
[Dev] Conquest Poll
Yes but what’s the point if it ends up in the same situation as now?
|