Recent posts by darkninja210 on Kongregate

Subscribe to Recent posts by darkninja210 on Kongregate

avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / firearms owners

Originally posted by warlord396:

Already have some. Would yousay that ~$.25/ round is a good price for surplus ammo?

darkninja usually gets like 20 rounds for around 6 bucks so yea ,25 a rd is good but if its corrosive primer ammo darkninja highly suggest you get some hopps 9 or ammonia to swab your barrel as soom as possible after firing it the ammonia neutralizes the potassium salts

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / firearms owners

Originally posted by warlord396:
Originally posted by darkninja210:
Originally posted by warlord396:

I’m glad you got your Vaquero back. For general target shooting i like automatics but I like shooting revolvers as well. by the way, do you know how .32 pistols and ammo compare in price to .380 ACP’s? i’ve been trying to get my mom a self-defense subcompact and was mostly considering .380 until you mentioned .32.

As far as price goes the .32 is alot cheaper unless your talking about quality self defense ammo then the difference isn’t much like $5 difference for 20 rds of hydrashock ammo. I would however suggest the .32 over the .380 as its all about penetration. just my $.02

my wife carries a judge in her purse……great trail gun too snakes stand no chance

Do you have any experience with the circuit judge carbine? That thing just seems awesome

Darkninja does not. It does seem like it would be a decent hunting/survival carbine thou might have to get one instead of an M6 aww hell who is darkninja kidding hes going to get them both

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / firearms owners

Originally posted by warlord396:

I’m glad you got your Vaquero back. For general target shooting i like automatics but I like shooting revolvers as well. by the way, do you know how .32 pistols and ammo compare in price to .380 ACP’s? i’ve been trying to get my mom a self-defense subcompact and was mostly considering .380 until you mentioned .32.

As far as price goes the .32 is alot cheaper unless your talking about quality self defense ammo then the difference isn’t much like $5 difference for 20 rds of hydrashock ammo. I would however suggest the .32 over the .380 as its all about penetration. just my $.02

my wife carries a judge in her purse……great trail gun too snakes stand no chance

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Should Gun Ownership Be Mandatory In the United States?

Originally posted by Darkruler2005:

Oh whats that less than half the average rate of crime there. Yeah these mandatory guns are a bad idea they make people follow the law we sure wouldn’t want that now would we.

I know you’re trolling, but at least try to make a point. If we remove all laws, then crime rate drops by 100%. By your logic, that’s a great idea. Your view is so extremely limited (crime rate drops, surely that must be a good thing!), that you fail to address all issues that make mandatory gun ownership a bad thing for almost everyone involved.

Darkninja never suggested that there are to be no laws nice try slipping that in also why on earth are you still here and you have been quite busy it looks like 16k posts wow. what darkninja is getting at is that an armed populace does serve as a deterrent to crime and in that regard the evidence for gun ownership is highly favorable.
 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts

Topic: Serious Discussion / Should Gun Ownership Be Mandatory In the United States?

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Should Gun Ownership Be Mandatory In the United States?

Well how about we do a case study on good ole Kennesaw Georgia where gun ownership is mandatory by law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennesaw,_Georgia

Oh whats that less than half the average rate of crime there. Yeah these mandatory guns are a bad idea they make people follow the law we sure wouldn’t want that now would we.

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Logical Contradictions Contradict God.

God forbids pre-marital sex → gets unmarried virgin pregnant
way to go god…………

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Unusual occurances

Preacher:“Give God the first portion of your income, say that with me,
Give God the first portion of your income. Give it first!
Not after deducts, not after the social security, and the hospitilization, and the
malnutrition. Not after all these things on your check you say, I’m gonna give God a
little what’s left. You do, and that’s what you gonna get from God.
Don’t put away your wallets just yet, brothers and sisters. There’s somebody here I’d
like all of you to meet. This is little Jonathan. Jonathan, say hello to the lovely
people, (heyllo). Jonathan has problems. Twisted neck, tangled legs, crooked spine, but
we can heal this boy. For just, uh, six thousand dollars, we can heal this boy!
Would you like to healed, little Jonathan? (yes, reverand).
You see brothers and sisters, this…(beep-beep beep-beep)
Excuse me. I told you never to page me on a sermon day. Yes?
Uh-huh. Hallalujah. Outty. People, that was the lord, today only, he will heal this boy,
for just five thousand dollars!”
Pass the collection plate
Preacher:“Four-thousand, eight-hundred, nine-hundred, five thousand
Hallalujah, you did it brothers and sisters. Are you ready, Jonathan?
(yes, reverand) Lord Almighty, we’ve met your price, give me the healing power, I can
feel it, Lord! Roomy loomy lama noma noomy!
This boy is healed. (really?) Now to the naked eye, it would appear that this boy has
not been healed, but I can assure you, this boy’s spirit has been healed. Inside this
tangled, mangled frame is a healed little boy. His spirit is healed, Hallalujah!”

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Mac VS. PC(ding ding ding fight!)

Originally posted by Captain_Catface:

PC: Best for people who are smart and/or gamers and/or rich.

Mac: Better for poor, stupid people, who only want to do office work. o-o

ehhh darkninja has known quite a few people darkninja would consider intelligent that liked macs but only for their unsupported viewpoints and opinions of what made a computer better. as far as darkninjas concerned if you have ever been to an apple store the prices are just ridiculous that issue alone is why darkninja will never own an unjustly overpriced product when just as good comparable products are available for much less. for what its worth unix or solaris are some interesting OSs to compare to OSX

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / a thread on the morality of stealing

stealing is never ever ever ok. for 1 if you have to steal its most likely because of poor choices that you made in life that put you at a disadvantage that in order to survive you may need to steal.
2. if you have an actual need for something its not hard to set up a charity or even just plan ask. darkninja gives the homeless granola bars and dinners not money.
3. if you universalize the morality of stealing based on need then anyone that provides a product or service that people actually need for survival: food shelter health water then has no way of making a better living for them self so they are reduced to working for free while others that may “choose” to not work still get to live the same quality of life. so why then should people work for free if they can just steal what they need and it be morally and ethically ok well they cannot stealing is never ok and if you morally think its ok to steal what you need for survival it causes all civil life to collapse if applied universally.

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Mac VS. PC(ding ding ding fight!)

Macs users = people who think that macs are more hip and falsely superior to PCs because they “dont crash” “dont get viruses” and “are easier to use”. the real facts of the matter are that PCs are vastly more flexible in usage can be more easily tailored to support any kind of custom operating system and can utilize the most advanced and best hardware available period. when the world governments start using macs instead of PCs darkninja will concede that macs are better until then absolutely not.

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Should Gun Ownership Be Mandatory In the United States?

Originally posted by Tacket:

No, because not everyone in the United States is trustworthy. Even people with no previous record. This must be kept in mind.

your so right we should start restricting things like driving licenses more and have mandatory state sponsored drugs tests. hell since everyone may be untrustworthy we as citizens should start watching each other to make sure we are not plotting terrorist activities or planning communist take overs. guess its a good thing we have the patriot act and us real americans can throw you in jail without a fair trial. cant trust what some one may be thinking if they are reading books trying to get educated doesnt america provide everything they need.

Its not that darkninja doesnt agree with you on “no” its that your reasoning is absolutely piss poor.

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Making firearms in countries that have strict laws against them

Within the London Metropolitan Police there are a number of Operational Command Units (OCUs) that employ AFOs.

  • The Belmarsh Firearms Team protects Trials at Woolwich Crown Court
  • The Territorial Support Group has a small pool of AFOs for certain security tasks.
  • The Specialist Crime Directorate arms certain surveillance officers.
  • Some detectives in the Flying Squad are armed.
  • Special Branch deploys armed officers in its surveillance units, and in A Squad, which protects the Prime Minister and other dignitaries.
  • Royalty Protection Department, which protects members of the Royal Family and guards royal property.
  • Special Escort Group, which escorts and protects high-risk convoys and VIPs such as the Prime Minister and the Queen.
  • Diplomatic Protection Group, which guards embassies and government buildings. It also provides the armed guards at Parliament to supplement the Palace of Westminster Division, which is unarmed.
  • Aviation Security, which protects Heathrow and London City airports.
  • Specialist Firearms Command (CO19), which provides armed support to the rest of the service, crewing Armed Response Vehicles and providing Specialist Firearms Officers (SFOs)
gee darkninja wonders where london is….oh thats right within the united kingdom
 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Making firearms in countries that have strict laws against them

Use that concept only when applicable.

you mean when darkninja called you out for taking the idea of not having laws of an object and inflated it to taking away all laws, yea no slipperslope there.

I pointed out this is silly, since it works for every criminal wanting to break the law. Law-abiding citizens won’t break the law (by definition), criminals already did (by definition). A law shows what the government doesn’t want you to do, not what won’t ever happen.
So, again, in short, making it illegal to kill doesn’t stop people from killing, and law-abiding citizens won’t do it any way. I’m not saying your stance is wrong, but that your argument for it is.

darkninjas pretty sure that he hasnt made an argument but here lets go with the idea the law bans private ownership of firearms. criminals manage to get/make/improvise firearms in spite of law. with only criminals having firearms the general populace is essentially at the mercy of the criminal unless of course they would rather be shot. darkninja finds this kind of law to be one which empowers criminals.
Where did I say it isn’t? What I’m saying there is that it didn’t matter it was a golf club, and that the same result would be found if they used a gun. I also stated that a golf club apparently was effective, and you don’t necessarily need a gun.

yep you missed it and it was right under your nose this time darky pretty funny actually
Originally posted by vikaTae:
Originally posted by darkninja210:

ummm the UKs police carry guns now and the rest of your post is typical hoplophobic lies


if criminals will have guns in spite of laws and bans what purpose do the laws/bans serve?


You may be confusing the UK police force with the French police, or the Irish. Its probably easy enough to do, the countries are right next to one another and all.


UK police don’t carry firearms except in highly specialised rapid response teams that are typically one team per jurisdiction (at most – not all have them). The ones that do carry firearms, carry rifles, as their job is to take the gunperson down quickly with lethal force.


nope not confused at all http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorised_Firearms_Officer while not exactly common the point is that UK police officers can and do carry firearms

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Making firearms in countries that have strict laws against them

Originally posted by Darkruler2005:

The citizens are the ones who will follow the laws, not the criminals. You can pass all the laws you want, but they will only affect the lawful.

if criminals will have guns in spite of laws and bans what purpose do the laws/bans serve?

That’s funny. We shouldn’t have any laws at all then? Hey, only criminals will murder, the lawful won’t. So, we don’t need the right to life.

I read a newspaper article telling about some golfers in England that were about to be robbed, using their clubs as…clubs…and beating the criminals. The golfers were arrested.

They would have been arrested just as easily if they shot the criminals. (Silly reasoning, by the way, but let’s go with the flow here for a while.) The weapon doesn’t matter. It does show, though, that a golf club apparently could help them against robbers.

slipperslope much? darkninja merely points out that the laws that disarm citizens only disarm citizens and serve no purpose in making the populace safer

darkninjas guessing you missed it darky self defense is apparently illegal in england

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Should redheads be kept in zoos?

absolutely we should also do the same for native americans cannibals and albinos

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Making firearms in countries that have strict laws against them

Originally posted by thijser:

Well there is a basic reason the government doesn’t want people to have firearms especially the english (their police doesn’t even have firearms). The more firearms the more people are inclined to kill each other because “he might be armed”. Usually when there are real predators that regularly attack people in a area then there will be laws to protect people either by allowing weapons or some sort of control on this animals population.

ummm the UKs police carry guns now and the rest of your post is typical hoplophobic lies

if criminals will have guns in spite of laws and bans what purpose do the laws/bans serve?

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Butt Scratchar!

who wants one?

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / You wake up finding a little demon girl in the corner of your room.

Originally posted by CasP3r1:

What do you do?

sex

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / I hate marijuana users

Originally posted by Speaksforthedead:

5567 posts

So?

oldfag

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / I hate marijuana users

Originally posted by Speaksforthedead:
Originally posted by Christopher_Lee:
Originally posted by Speaksforthedead:

Ditto.

You mad?

Post count motherfucker, do you care for it?

Not really, what’s that got to do with anything?

getting over being a newfag?

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Magic The Gathering

oh wow magic is still popular/cool darkninjas pretty sure he has around 3000 ice age 4th edition fallen empire cards if anyone wants them are they worth the 5 dollar boosters darkninja spent on em nowa days?

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / I hate marijuana users

Originally posted by Christopher_Lee:
Originally posted by Speaksforthedead:
Originally posted by Christopher_Lee:
Originally posted by Speaksforthedead:
Originally posted by Christopher_Lee:

proof?

Google motherfucker, do you have it?

Proof motherfucker, do you have it?

Retard motherfucker, are you one?

Butthurt motherfucker, are you one?

Grammar motherfucker, do you use it?

hahahhaha do world kind a favor become an hero

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / 2010 is almost over

oh god no please no darkninja needs more mass stabbings to happen with gun carriers as the heros

 
avatar for darkninja210 darkninja210 2410 posts
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / 2010 is almost over

ehhh go out with a bang get drunk watch a guitar fall in downtown nashville then back to the grind darkninja had a really good Dec happy new year bitches