Recent posts by BCLEGENDS on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / MYSTERY REPLAY MAFIA - Day 4: 9/6, 5:30 PM, UTC+3

seemed overly defensive on BC’s part at the time, and still does.

I have no idea where you’re getting “defensive” from. He’d suggested he was a cop earlier, then backtracked after the claim was made. Seems like a pretty good reason to vote for someone, and many other people agreed with me.

He followed this up by starting a pointless argument about the extension (for the record, BC was mostly right: the day 3 extension was wasted by pretty much everyone except Prec; but this doesn’t change the pointlessness—or the hypocrisy of the argument).

I think whether or not somebody’s right about something vastly changes whether or not it’s pointless or hypocritical. In this case, it was pointless, since the extension went through, and was wasted in pretty much the way I predicted, but it can hardly be called hypocritical for those exact reasons.

Also took the unusual line of accepting Gonkey’s doctor claim, but then turning around and saying that doctors can still be mafia, which, well, OK yeah but whatever.

Yes.

[all these have to be true in order to implicate BC as an SK, ergo BC is probably an SK – Lou]

This has already been addressed.

All things considered, then, I think it’s probably a good idea to vote Bookworm52, for the reasons indicated by Lou.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / Applebottom's Exceptionals [Signups & Discussions] [Signups Always Open]

Originally posted by Xandrya:

Bloody, why not type up a nice, updated post to give us a fresh perspective on our locations?

Yes! Also, actions regarding that one invisible enemy. That’s important.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Something needs to be said about feminism/liberalism.

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:

Paul Joseph Watson also said this re feminism.

Yes, he did. And what are you trying to say by linking one of his videos here? That he’s anti-feminist? Oh, hey, that was pre-established before you even clicked the channel link. Good job.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Something needs to be said about feminism/liberalism.

So this thread got bigger than last time I was here. Or it got more argumentative, anyway.

This is a man called Paul Joseph Watson. He works as the editor of a site called InfoWars, and he is one of the most down-to-Earth characters regarding social issues of this sort that I’ve seen so far. To those who believe modern feminism, or indeed a number of other social movements such as #BlackLivesMatter, is an egalitarian movement – which, as several people have already pointed out, myself included, it doesn’t even attempt to pretend towards – watch his videos.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / [RP] Le Voyage Des Ames [Sign-Ups]

Originally posted by SadFire:

Nope, but I’m just going to start this despite the turmoil and what have you. So, does this evening work for people, or push it off to the weekend?

Either works.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / MYSTERY REPLAY MAFIA - Day 4: 9/6, 5:30 PM, UTC+3

Originally posted by Kadleon:

Whoops, it should be 4.

…I’m still only counting three definite killers. It was four kills over two nights, which could easily be fulfilled by three killing parties at the start, i.e. two killers after night 1 had an SK killed off. 4/2=2. There probably could be more than three overall, but you seem to be acting as though there have to be at least six four, which there clearly don’t. Could you explain why you think that, please?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / MYSTERY REPLAY MAFIA - Day 4: 9/6, 5:30 PM, UTC+3

What’s interesting is that while only 3 NKs happened in the first night, 4 happened in the subsequent nights (even with the death of a SK), which means that Bluji has input at least 6 killing roles/factions in the game.

I’ve taken a while to say anything about this, since I wasn’t sure whether my response would be nonsensical, but… what you’ve said doesn’t seem to add up. Three NKs occurred in night 1, that’s fine. Then you say that four happened in subsequent nights, two per night… and that adds up to six killing parties total how? If anything, it suggests that only two killing parties are left – three NKs night 1, including one killing role, followed up by two NKs in night 2 and another two in night 3, indicating that two killing roles remain. Where did you get six out of that?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / MYSTERY REPLAY MAFIA - Day 4: 9/6, 5:30 PM, UTC+3

Originally posted by Bluji:

Is this mafia in any way derived from Psychosi Mafia?

You actually assume I would answer that question?

…it was worth asking.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / MYSTERY REPLAY MAFIA - Day 4: 9/6, 5:30 PM, UTC+3

Actually, Lou makes a good point. Duplication would explain why both he and Prec appear to have identical roles, as well as Woon and SS’ apparently identical “night-flipping sanity cop”… I will say that according to the mafiascum entry on cops, typical returned results are Town/Not Town to establish if somebody’s a Townie, Not Mafia/Mafia to establish if somebody’s Scum, and Guilty/Not Guilty to presumably deal with Indie investigations at the GM’s own discretion; it may be that Indie roles are being revealed as Town or Mafia depending on whether they assist those roles or not just to be obstructive, or that Woon and Silent are flipping between Naive and Paranoid between nights (or, of course, that they’re colluding with one another as scumbuddies, but that’s a somewhat unlikely scenario).

Actually, since we’re on the topic, I can only think of one mafia that had cops whose investigation sanity flipped between nights the way Woon and Silent seem to be doing. And maybe I’m wrong, but since this is clearly a mafia with bastard roles in it, it seems fair to ask about it. MOD: Is this mafia in any way derived from Psychosi Mafia?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / MYSTERY REPLAY MAFIA - Day 4: 9/6, 5:30 PM, UTC+3

BC, I blocked you last night. There’s still one less night kill when all dead are townies. What’s your defense?

You mean aside from the possibility that one of the deceased in night 1 was a killing role? Oh, wait a minute, there’s your defense: both graveyard and crystalmask were Indie roles, so both of them could feasibly have been serial killers. Not to mention back’s flip as a mafioso – if the mafia don’t have a factional kill of their own (unlikely but possible), or if back had his own killing ability on top of the mafia’s factional kill, then his death very readily explains the discrepancy – or the possibility that Pulsaris was a Vigilante. My point is, there are four good reasons why there haven’t been three nightkills per night after night one. Take your pick.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / MYSTERY REPLAY MAFIA - Day 4: 9/6, 5:30 PM, UTC+3

Yeah, go figure that Gonkey is Town. I will say in response to Precarious’ pre-emptive FoS of me, however, two things that I didn’t get the opportunity to point out yesterday before the day ended:
1. Doctor is not necessarily Townie. Again. Needless to say, that also applies in reverse, i.e. Gonkey is not necessarily a doctor, though it is admittedly more likely if we assume that Townies have no reason to lie about such things.
2. You said before that if Gonkey flips Town, it implicates me as a killing role. Consider, however, the extreme level of coincidence that would be required in order to prove all of your assumptions correct in that regard:

Gonkey would need to be a doctor, who just so happened to protect me out of all other possible options (effectively picking somebody at random), who happened to possess a killing role and happened to target you on the same night as I was protected; you then happen to have a role that reflects nightkills back at your would-be assailant, such that I would have died if not for Gonkey protecting me and nobody else targeting me for a nightkill (assuming one protection is only good for one NK attempt).

Naturally, there’s a lot of variables in play there, all of which have to be true in order to implicate me as a killing role. This is, of course, somewhat unlikely. With that in mind, I’d like to say that, in my opinion, it would have been more suspicious on my part if Gonkey had been a mafioso, since that same sequence of events would have then implicated me as a fellow mafioso, who could have collaborated with Gonkey in order to be protected from any NKs that might have affected an NK made by me or prevented me from making kill attempts on other people in future nights, which would incidentally have also protected me against your vengeful kill reflection… but, of course, Gonkey was not a mafioso. So, basically, I’m positing that Gonkey’s role as a townie means it’s actually less likely that I’m a killing role than if he were a mafioso for reasons of probability comparison.

 

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / [Mafia] Cells [Night 2]

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / [Mafia] Cells [Night 2]

I’m pretty sure “this person agrees with what I’ve said” doesn’t count as buddying when there’s only so many people actually being active in the first place. By that token, I could say Pulsaris is buddying with Gonkey, but that isn’t necessarily true either. In any case, I never said you “worded anything badly”, back, but there is quite clearly more evidence pointing towards you than toward anyone else at this precise moment, discounting the beliefs of certain people that my voting for you is an irrational scum play for some reason. As for day’s end, it ends when the host says it ends. Host hasn’t said it ended yet, unless he ends it yesterday retroactively.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / Trux Terraru (Playing Thread)

[Sorry for not posting recently. I uhhhhhh got distracted. Yyyyeah.]

Asger Asmund
‘…huh,’ I say, taking a look around in order to associate each target on the map with its equivalent throughout the hills. ‘Sounds like an interestin’ tale. I hope ye get what you’re lookin’ for, then. Er, excuse me a moment…’ With that said, I begin to trudge down from the shooting area to gather up the arrows I’ve fired, returning once I’ve collected them all, and then looking around for my next target.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / [Mafia] Cells [Night 2]

@Pulsaris: First of all, way to be unusually sarcastic for no good reason, twice. Second, explanation? You mean aside from all the stuff that’s already been said about him? Never mind hand, Arm of Suspicion Pulsaris.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / [Mafia] Cells [Night 2]

Originally posted by back900:

Not sure how I became suspicious by pointing out an unusual suggestion by a player.

To save my skin I will [vote:BCLEGENDS] nice of you to attack someone V/LA after saying not to vote mommy because he is inactive.

Nice of you to once again not realise that my vote for you had nothing to do with you V/LA announcement. Still, I’m probably screwed anyway, since it’s three to two against me.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / [Mafia] Cells [Night 2]

EBWOP: Okay, so I gave an argument, and nobody’s responded in five hours or so. I was under the impression that voting somebody out for supposedly not wording statements well was frowned upon in mafia games, moreso when the death is brought about after a single post, by two people, who completely fail to respond to the subsequent defense statements made by the accused.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / [Mafia] Cells [Night 2]

Originally posted by BrainpanSonata:

FoS BC Your wording contradicts itself. You say that nobody seems immediately suspicious, then vote back as being the most suspicious. On top of that, I’m waiting on word from the mod on whether or not a vote is necessary today. In a time where everyone wants to play cautiously, you’re being very gung ho.

…as viewed by the group. He’s the most suspicious person as viewed by the group. I thought I’d made that obvious – “the most significantly suspicious player as a whole”, as in via the consideration of the group prior to my post. Was my language that undecipherable?

Originally posted by Gonkeymonkey:

Jumping to vote for someone right after they said they’d be V/LA is very suspicious because you’re taking advantage of the fact that they can not defend themselves. In addition, the contradiction of your wording that Brain talked about. Vote: BCLEGENDS

My vote had nothing to do with him being V/LA. And again, I point out that, if you actually read it, it’s nothing like as contradictory as you may think.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / [Mafia] Cells [Night 2]

So, I’m just going to go ahead and say that nobody seems immediately suspicious to me personally at the moment, and I don’t really know whether or not “no NKs” is a thing in this game. However, for the sake of activity, and of actually ensuring we vote for somebody this time round, I’m going to go ahead and vote: back900 as the most significantly suspicious player as a whole, since the only other viable lynch target is the inactive mommyrocks, which implies nothing about his role either way.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / JoJo's Cultist Adventure [Signups & Discussion] [Signups always open]

I have no idea what Joan and Billie’s theme song would be. However, very well done for the art pieces you’ve come up with so far, FlyingCat.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / JoJo's Cultist Adventure [Game Thread] [Sign-ups Always Open]

Joan Jones
‘Uh, s-sure,’ I say to Dom. ’I’ll take a cab with you both. I believe…’
And let’s just double check here…
‘…yes, I have my own money with me, so don’t worry about paying for my part of the fare.’
‘Can I come with you too?’
Oh, it’s Adam. I… kind of forgot he was here, to be honest. He’s been awfully quiet for a bit, so… uhhhh…
You messed up. That’s fine. Just say “yes you can”.
‘Oh, um, ah- sure, I don’t mind, and I assume Josh and Dom won’t either. There’ll be enough seats in the taxi for all of us, so…’


So we got the cab, I returned to the hotel, and, uh… fell asleep fairly quickly after all was said and done, to be honest. Even Billie wasn’t quite as overtly lewd as she tends to be when we’re in private. What a day, I suppose. What a day…

[I forgot to do posting for this for a while. Also, since I have control over Adam for the time being, I had him ask that particular question, then left it ambiguous as to whether he actually went in the cab to minimise godmodding. I’m going to guess there’s no problem with him actually going by cab with Joan, Josh and Dom, anyway.]

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / JoJo's Cultist Adventure [Signups & Discussion] [Signups always open]

Originally posted by FlyingCat:

I’ll try working on Matt now. I really don’t mind if people are picky about their appearance, and this may really help players feel more immersive if they understand what everything looks like.

Here’s my new sketch on it. If there’s something you don’t like or if the design is too simple, I can change that.
http://i.imgur.com/dSrh5k3.png

I’m also SO glad I asked you. Before I took a two hour nap, I made a sketch based on what I thought you wanted. It was scary to say at the very least.

Much better, and a very good job you’ve done of it. Still missing gems across the ribbons – as I said, there should ideally be five or six along the length of each ribbon – and if you’re going to do a full-body view of 「Billie Jean」, I’ll say now that there are also gems along the length of its arms and legs (let’s say that spatially, they form loose circles around each limb in which the gems also happen to form fairly widely-spaced lines along the length of the limbs, for the sake of simplicity in repetition), as well as (and this is a recent edit to fit with the whole “gemstones” theme) a row of three gems at the level of its navel and the base of its spine holding up the groin-hiding ribbons. I figured that was both more appropriate and more enticing than a loop of string, so…

Originally posted by BLOODYRAIN10001:
Originally posted by BCLEGENDS:

BC, it said between 1 and 100 meters, that means no atomic scale bullshit.

Okay, so what is “it”, and where does “it” say that about any Stand power? There’s a major protagonist in JJBA canon who can turn inanimate objects into animals; if that doesn’t involve atomic-scale manipulation, I don’t know what does.

….I’m talking about mar’s ability, no need to be an ass.
Edit: and in case you still didn’t get the gist of what I’m saying, “it” means what mar typed up for their ability.

Oh, alright. I guess that’s fair enough, then. Sorrah for the unintentional rudeness.

[Nevermore suggestions by FC]

Interesting considerations. Another proposal could be that the distance alterations can only extend so far from the Stand proper – whilst 「Nevermore」 itself can move anywhere within 100 meters of Shiro, it can only manipulate distance within, say, five meters of itself, such that attacks always seem to be on target at first, only to narrowly miss every time for no obvious reason. To make a somewhat distant and possibly ostracising comparison, it could be used in a similar manner to the Semblance of Pyrrha Nikos from RWBY; she basically has control over magnetism, but tends to use it very subtly to give the illusion that she’s untouchable, which is something Shiro could emulate by using 「Nevermore」 to basically bend attacks around his already small and presumably difficult to hit frame.

Oh and by the way, you forgot to add in your Stand’s Power stat, mar. Just saying, that needs calculating.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / The General Thread

Originally posted by SypherKhode822:
Originally posted by adv0catus:

Why can’t you date someone if you’re asexual?

Probably cause they’d eventually want to bump uglies, and that could lead to some confusion.

I mean, you totally can date other people as an asexual, and there’s nothing saying any given asexual couldn’t have sex with a partner. It’d just be a chore for them to do at best, as opposed to a fun and pleasurable time as most people experience it. Also, daily reminder that sexual and romantic spectrums are separate from one another.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / JoJo's Cultist Adventure [Signups & Discussion] [Signups always open]

BC, it said between 1 and 100 meters, that means no atomic scale bullshit.

Okay, so what is “it”, and where does “it” say that about any Stand power? There’s a major protagonist in JJBA canon who can turn inanimate objects into animals; if that doesn’t involve atomic-scale manipulation, I don’t know what does.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Forum Games: Forum Games / JoJo's Cultist Adventure [Signups & Discussion] [Signups always open]

@BCLEGENDS You’ve giving an awfully distinct request and reference for the sake of fixing some petty details in her drawing. Then again, I’m no artist myself so I suppose I don’t have a say in that.

…and she doesn’t have to fix it if she’d rather not. I assumed, however, that she did by the content of her post, hence why I made the rough reference. Y’know, in case she did want to change something.

EDIT: So mar, a couple of ideas for use of your ability came to me. In theory, altering the distance between things of a similar nature could allow Shiro/Quoth to, for instance, reduce the space between molecules of an object, and therefore increase their density… or it could be used to increase the amount of relative time between two seconds. Just a thought.