Recent posts by saybox on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Petition: Stop giving user requested permanent bans.

No, for four reasons:

1. The post says Kong “can’t guarantee” to get back an account, not that they refuse to help or that they’re stretched to thin to do so. If your forgot the password to your level 2 alt and have to valid email on it, forget it. Bought Kreds and can prove it with your payment info? You’re probably gonna find they’re able to help you out. How would you verify ownership of a free account with no payment info and no valid email address? Every other possible verification method takes far more time.

2. It takes the same amount of time to reject or accept a request, in terms of replying to the person who sent it. Bans likely take three clicks (load profile, click ban, verify ban). This time spent on this is minimal once someone has sent their request.

3. In most part of the world you have the right to request a site removes your account in some way or other, much the same as they have to ask you before they sell your email address to someone.

4. The idea that community staff are stretched too thin just because they don’t post much on forums much doesn’t make much sense. Here’s a secret: community admin is just a friendlier way to say CS rep. 90% of their work is likely spent in Zendesk, whether they reply to emails directly or oversee people who do. Forums are awful for tech support, because you constantly have people jumping in with extra “help”, you can’t verify any account info in public, and people forget they posted in the first place. As far as simply chatting to the community goes…. this is just a strange obsession. Do you guys not understand Kong pays them to work, not to sit around and chat about whatever with people?

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Test my old-school arcade game and help game research!

I’m not sure what the research topic is – the survey just seemed to be “variations of is this game fun?” – but I felt the game suffered from a few major flaws.

First, it doesn’t feel like you win through skill. I mean, there’s some strategy to it, but mostly you’re gonna win if you just flail around in a circle randomly. I feel like you could probably get a similar win rate by pressing keys with your eyes shut, although I didn’t try. I’d also think it’s entirely possible to win without pressing any keys at all, although I didn’t quite manage it (I got pretty close). There’s a big problem with a supposedly skill based game if you can do equally well by leaving it running on its own, to actually trying to play well. Try leaving Space Invaders running by itself – you won’t win.

The way to win by “skill” is simply to do loops in the centre of the board – whoever is in the middle can’t be beaten unless everyone else works together to surround them, which the bots will never do. On the other hand, you’ll get beaten pretty quickly if you sit at the side of the board, because you’ll get squashed against the walls. Looping the walls back around would mitigate this but at the cost of accessibility.

Secondly, the difficulty is backwards. 1v1 is far easier than 1v1v1v1v1v1v1 or however many players start. 1v1 and 1v1v1 are the only points where you could argue skill matters, but a single player game should scale upwards in difficulty – clearly with the elimination condition that can’t happen. In multiplayer this would be more engaging.

And thirdly there’s no real gameplay loop. You play and then you stop and then the game is over. Done. Although it’s harder to understand now what made 80s classics like Pong, Missile Command, etc so engaging, it’s because (relative to their time) they had a solid loop that drove the player to keep playing. Missile Command sends more and more missiles at you as you play, you shoot them and get more points, then you get more missiles fired at your town as a result of doing better at the game. There’s no win condition, it’s guaranteed nuclear armegeddon which you have to hold off as long as you can. Space Invaders is similar – you shoot the aliens and they approach faster and faster, wave after wave. With the exception of Pong, every arcade classic from the 80s that I can think of has a neverending gameplay loop. You play, you get points for doing well, then the game is harder, and you continue until you die. I’m not saying this is essential for a game to be good, but a key theme of games from that era is that they keep getting more difficult until you eventually die, and the motivation to play again is to beat your previous best. In your game once you’ve won there’s no reason to ever play again, and you win pretty fast – the game has a fixed maximum length since it’s timer based.

If you tasked the player with defending their space on the board with more opponents being added gradually, that might be more engaging. For example, if every icon except your own had 3hp, and ‘eliminating’ them actually deducted 1 hp and shrunk their control area (the minimal area around their icon), you could start with 1v1 and the difficulty would scale up. Adding new opponents based on total points would mean the difficulty ramped up at a reasonable pace and would give the player the choice between eliminating opponents to keep the board clear as long as possible, or reducing opponents to low hp and therefore lower control areas, making them less dangerous in large numbers. The player could still win by doing spyderloops in the middle of the board, but in terms of making the game into an endless, repeatable challenge, this would be an improvement.

when your research is complete I do hope we get to see the results, though.

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Does Them/He/Those run Kongregate?

Originally posted by TheDestroyer1525:
Originally posted by saybox:

It’s Greg it’s all Greg it’s always been Greg everything is Greg.

What? We’re not talking of greg we’re talking of the runner of kong


Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Does Them/He/Those run Kongregate?

It’s Greg it’s all Greg it’s always been Greg everything is Greg.

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Are you more likely to rate a game you love or hate?

Yes I am.

Flag Post

Topic: Game Programming / GiTD ideas for future prizes & #50

The biggest problem GiTD has is that nobody enters it anymore. And there’s a few reasons behind that. Part of it is because the programming board is mostly dead – I said a few years ago that if the regulars (at the time) kept ridiculing Stencyl users, refusing to help AS2 programmers, and sending new devs to Google or other sites, that the board would gradually die. Nobody listened but hey, look, the forum died. It doesn’t get the activity it used to by a long shot and the guys who are still here aren’t usually making stuff for GiTD. So the first thing GiTD needs is nothing to do with GiTD itself, it’s a culture shift here. I realise the board is called the programming forum, but we should see that as a quirk of how Kong set the boards up and be more welcoming to people who just want to make a game, regardless of HOW they want to work.

Similarly, GiTD itself has gradually gone from “hey make something cool in three days, post your results” to this massive sprawling thing with tons of finicky rules and a kind of “this thing never ends” feeling to it. Every month we seem to have rule discussion, then theme selection ,then 10 days to work in, and then the voting phase. As with the above, we should focus back on “LETS MAKE SOMETHING COOL” and forget all the rules and clauses about this and that. It makes it so much easier to enter a game jam if the rules are “Here’s the theme, here’s how long you have, and you start now.” Everything else should be a “sure, you can do that.” Make it easy to take part.

The theme itself…. ehhh it’s getting better but this whole theme-by-committee thing has never clicked for me. We’ve seen people in the past demand their theme suggestion gets picked, and refuse to enter whne it didn’t. And even now, “Justin Bieber epic RPG” definitely narrows the possible participants more than “Justin Bieber” or “epic rpg” would.

We also need to see GiTD for what it is, not what people hope it will become. It’s a tiny contest that next to nobody enters, and the games that come out of it generally get no plays outside the contest, other than one or two like CuriousGaming’s entries. Many of the discussions about it read like people think it’s this huge popular contest where all the games are rockstar quality. They aren’t and we have to be realistic about that. Credit to everyone who takes part, but frontpaging is already a possible prize if your game is frontpage quality, simply because Kong frontpages any games that are that good.

I must note that the reason I stopped taking part so much is for health reasons, and all of what I put in this post is what would theoretically encourage me to enter if i was able to. I’d like to make a big push for GiTD 50 and see if I can take part, but no promises.

So some things I think would really push GiTD:

1. Profile bling just for entering. Honestly, a Panion would be ideal here. I know you said it can’t be done, but offering a GiTD panion for anyone who’s ever (past or future) participated would be such a nice thing to do. And make it shiny for winners (past or future). Kong does nothing with Panions right now, and badges, awards, tickets, etc aren’t pushed in the way they used to be, so this makes perfect sense to me. If this was one Panion for EVERY GitD ever, the extra work on Kong’s side makes more sense, rather than a special GiTD50 one But you could introduce it with 50.

2. For GiTD 50 in particular, how about an admin private message whne it starts, sent to any developer on the entire site who a/ has at least one game uploaded, and b/ never reached 3.8 on any of their games (ie they’ve never made a game that would be considered for badging)? Push the recognition for smaller / beginner devs. I bet we’d see interest from people who don’t even know the forum is here.

3. IMO this should be a Kong community thing. Don’t promote it to people outside Kong – they’ll just sweep the prizes and leave again./ That’s not fun for anyone here.

4. Scale the rewards with the number of entries. Two people take part? Forget about frontpage exposure. 20 people make something? Find some space to promote the voting. 50 entries? Very unlikely, but find a little block on the frontpage to promote the games themselves. Etc. Stuff like that. Current GiTD setup subtlely makes it more worthwhile for entrants to participate alone – you’re more likely to win if nobody else enters. Scaling the possible rewards means we all have reason to encourage other people to take part too.

5. Voting is a big problem for GiTD. We need a better solution if it’s ever going to be a bigger contest. While I don’t like adding more complexity to things, even at the size we currently have GiTD at, we’ve seen people voting on alts, getting friends to vote, miscounting votes, and so on. On a larger scale this will be embarrassing.

6. Admins playing the winning game isn’t a good prize IMO – for two reasons. Firstly, whoever wins doesn’t need their comments and feedback on the game, and secondly because admins aren’t celebrities in the way they used to be, nobody except unnamed admin fan is obsessed with then anymore. The days of “Greg Month”, “Greg Game Jam”, etc are long gone now.

7. BUT – if you could collect some major devs + admins and guarantee at least one of them cwould comment contructively on every game that entered, that would be neat. Like….. you didn’t end up with a polished game, here’s JMTBTMB and his elephant to tell you what could be better. Or here’s Mr Run to tell you what gameplay mechanci you could have done better.

8. I also think pries should be relevant to community members. Not stuff that outside devs would care about so much. Frontpage placement for a wining game would be nice, but let’s face it, very few GiTD winners have been that level of quality. I can only think of two offhand. So ruling that out, and personally I’d prefer to move away from Kred prizes, the options are profile bling, free K+, etc. Reward people who want to participate in the community, rather than throwing $15 at them and calling it a day. Cmon. Push for a Panion.

9. Kong livestream featuring all entries to the contest, whne voting starts?

10. Once upon a time there was a developer newsletter. Haven’t seen one in a long time. Bring it back?

11. And of course, the main newsletter, social media, etc are all options for promotion for the winner.

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / so do we have rating botters?

Originally posted by Pulsaris:

1% may be for the typical, sucky MMO. Let’s compare with those welcomed MMOs.

Card Hunter: 32k rating, 1.4M plays
War of Omens: 29k ratings, 4.1M plays
BloodRealm: 22k rating, 3.2M plays
Rise of Champions: 31k rating, 1.2M plays

Card Hunter: 2% of gameplays generate a rating
War of Oms: 0.7%
BloodRealm: 0.6%
Rise of Champions: 2.5%
Transformice: 0.4%

  • 1% – 2% of ratings compare dt ogameplays is the normal range and anything falling inside this should be considered normal for an MMO (single player games vary a lot more).
  • Games with many links in outside of Kong, such as Transformice, have a lower ratings % because of the increased number of guest views. Note that you cannot play MMOs on Kong without an account, whereas you can play single player games and games like Transformice. Guests cannot rate games.
  • Similarly, games with extremely high replayability (transformice, good MMOs, etc) eventually stop bringing in new players. Their views are then from returning members, who can’t rate a second time, so the % should gradually drop.
  • A new MMO with promotion across Kong and lots of new players should be expected to get a higher % of ratings to gameplays early on, as most players are new and therefore haven’t rated it yet.
  • Based on the above, Legend Knight doesn’t have anything different about it to other MMOs. Does that rule out the idea of Kong boosting it? No. ArmorGames used to artificially rank the MMOs on their frontpage. It’s possible. However it does rule out the idea of bots being used to inflate the rating. The amount of promotion the game received guarantees that bots rating would noticeably affect the % of ratings to gameplays.

Considering the number of MMOs have ands the data Kong has about everyone playing them, I prefer the idea that Kong is able to selectively promote new MMOs to whoever it likes, knowing that the rating will be improved by showing people a game they want to play in the first place.

Could they find 5k players who like every MMO they play and tend to rate high? I’d bet that they could – and then they could send an email blast out to that group suggesting they try this new MMO, maybe even offering an early boost for this special group.

But don’t confuse “could” with “did” – this is hypothetical. I’d think that a good marketing team would be doing this, though, and it would be far more useful than simply boosting the rating that’s displayed. The conspiracy theory of Kong secretly boosting ratings doesn’t make Kong any money, whereas lining up whales to play a new game does. And it’s no different to the recommendation engine, exxcept that it’s marginally more personable. Show people games they’d like to play, and they’ll play them.

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / so do we have rating botters?

Originally posted by Lloyd_Majere:
Players: I can’t actually give any numbers here, but I can say that during the contest, I finished in the starter zone. That zone was packed enough to lag my computer at the time. Now when I load up the game there are literally like, five players in the area. Maybe there’s a few other factors, but it’s at least worth noting the decrease.

To save space I didn’t quote your entire post. But to have a massive decrease in players definitely does mean there were a lot of players before – from Kong promotion or otherwise – so 9k ratings (out of the millions of people Kong can show a game to) doesn’t seem unlikely to me. IMO every MMO on Kong sucks, but many of them are rated pretty high, so there’s clearly a big audience out there of people ho do like them.

Even for a now dead MMO, I don’t think it’s unrealistic to think that Kong could have found 5k people who enjoyed it and rated 5/5. Remember that MMOs get pushed much more than regular games – but you’re K+ and don’t see ads, but all MMOs get 1,000,000 free spotlight impressions to get them started.

Originally posted by hamuka:

If anything, the number of ratings convinces me that there was some kind of foul play. I was expecting roughly 3000 ratings. I simply don’t believe that 9,000 people actively rated that game, and enough of them rated it highly to sustain it’s 3.0+.

I actually went out of my way and measured the viewcount/rating ratio (highlighted in bold) of other MMO games with similar viewcounts (which, for Legend Knight, is 486k views / 9.3k ratings = 52.2) to get a deeper look into this.

Guess what, your assumption was perfectly right.

Esgrima 2, for example, has 557k views (more than LK), but only 6.2k ratings – a ratio of 89.8, almost half of Legend Knight’s. 8BitMMO has roughly 208k views, but only 2.5k ratings – a ratio of 83.2.

Now, compare these numbers with ProficientCity’s other MMOs. Zeus Age has 179k views, and somehow, a whopping 2.8k ratings, for a ratio of 63.9, similar to Legend Knight. SwordSaga has 65k views, and 1.3k ratings, making for a ratio of roughly 50.

Notice a pattern forming here?

Legend Knight: 1% of gameplays generates a rating.
Esgrima: 1% of gameplays generates a rating
8 Bit MMO: 1% of gameplays generates a rating
Zeus Age: 2%
SwordSaga: 2%
King of Towers: 1%

About 1% – 2% of gameplays (NOT unique players) typically generates a rating for MMOs.

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / so do we have rating botters?

Originally posted by Lloyd_Majere:

I only half believe this. It’s true that the loudest opinions are coming from a minuscule amount of players, but whether or not the rating accurately reflects the playerbase on whole is completely separate from that. I’d rather base my opinion here on the numbers, not assumptions:

If you’re going to talk about numbers, you’ve got to actually look at the numbers, not your own assumptions about them.

Legend Knight has 9,322 ratings and a 3.05 average, which Kong shows as 3.1 in the big ratings box.

Assuming it was on exactly 3.0500000 (it’s not), then if just 50 more people rate it 1/5, the rating will drop to 3.039 (which Kong will display as 3.04 in the game tab and 3.0 in the bigger ratings display panel).

In the other direction, only 50 more ratings at 5.5 will move it up to 3.06.

Originally posted by Lloyd_Majere:

The only way I can see a 3.8 being legit is, as Tulrog mentioned, the ratings were solely gotten from the users who enjoyed the game. But if that were the case, those users are a minority themselves (based on forum activity and chat room traffic), and the rating should have dropped much faster once the visibility increase allowed an accurate reflection of the game. But it didn’t even go down a full point, and it’s still ABOVE 3.0. Which means that the outraged majority who rated 1 are still outnumbered by the people who rated 4 or 5. That doesn’t make sense at all.

Assume that 50 ratings at 1/5 move the average by .01 each time (not actually the case, but to keep the math simple). Moving the rating to 3.05 from 3.80 in that case would require 3,750 people to rate it 1/5. In theory that leaves us with about 5k 5/5 votes -which isn’t actually true either because we’re not account for 2/5,3/5, or 4/5 votes – but still suggests the majority of people playing the game rated it positively.

Count up your “vocal majority of outraged players” from threads about it, game comments, etc. I bet the number of posts you can actually find, from unique users (not alts or people posting repeatedly), is far less than the expected ~4k that we should see. On the same note, if you count all the people who are playing the game and can be assumed to be enjoying it (eg they comment about the game itself, they post in the game forums, etc) I bet you’d find there were far more of those than the outraged posts. But not many of them will specifically post “I rated 5/5”, they’ll just be talking about the game itself.

Conclusion: you can’t deduce game rating based on the number of people stating they rated 1/5 or 5/5.

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Please unban Host_2phats

Originally posted by johnnycool11:

And saybox, you seem too radical with the word “clearly”. He did explain to me the situation a bit, they did a refund but didn’t unban him.

What is unclear about that??

So far we know three things:

  • he was banned for payment irregularities
  • the money was refunded at some point
  • he wasn’t unbanned after emailing

So in other words, the refund couldn’t be cancelled, and paying the money back to Kong again wasn’t an option either.

That sounds a lot like a payment was blocked or disputed for fraud – because when that happens, the refund is automatic, and Kong only gets a few weeks to try to reverse it. You said the issue is nothing to do with that, but you haven’t said what it did involve. Perhaps if you explained what caused the ban in the first place, people might be able to offer more informed opinions.

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Please unban Host_2phats

Originally posted by johnnycool11:

To saybox: I don’t see how that’s any relevant, they can’t ban him for that.

They clearly can cuz they did.

Since you clearly don’t know what caused his account to be flagged for fraud, I don’t see why you’re trying to argue the point. If his purchase was genuine, and wasn’t disputed with the bank, it should be simple for him to provide verification for Kong. If not, nothing you say here is going to make a difference.

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Please unban Host_2phats

Originally posted by johnnycool11:
As I said before, he could suspend the verification for a year it doesn’t change a thing, Host had no obligation to respond to their warnings

That isn’t true since credit card payments cannot be reversed after 6 months, and can’t be refunded after three.

Question as before: do you (or your friend, or whoever) now have the information required to verify the transactions?

Flag Post

Topic: Game Programming / Kongregate allows me to use external micro-transactions (other than Kredits)?

Just Kreds.

Flag Post

Topic: Game Programming / The right time to publish you game

When it’s done. The tricky part is deciding when it actually is done, to the point you can release it and be done with it. If it’s your first project, keep it short and simple and get it finished asap. Everyone will hate it but you can get feedback for your next game, which is essential to improve.

Of course, you should get a few peopel youk now to try it out first. Preferably not people who will always say they like it (eg mom).

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Please unban Host_2phats

Pretty sure all emails to Kong go to the same place, they’re just reassigned to a different department as needed. But the kreds department is the one that you need to talk to, since they’re the guys who will be able to look into why the ban was issued.

The issue is that online credit card fraud is very common on sites like Kong. If you were making purchases with stolen credit cards, not only is Kong out of the money you spent (they have to refund it even if you already used your Kreds), but they also get billed by their bank for every disputed payment, and potentially a large fine if they exceed a certain number of them. What causes the prompt to verify? Who knows….. maybe it’s based on how much you spend in a certain amount of time, or maybe you had a payment declined or disputed by your bank, or maybe it was a random sweep. But if you were flagged for potential fraud and didn’t verify it was legit, you can see why Kong would ban you.

Presumably you now have all the information needed to verify the purchases? If so it should be a simple process to get yourself unbanned.

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Kongregate is dying: How we can fix this

The golden age of Flash games has been and gone. Y’all should be pleased that you were here to see it – because what Kongregate used to be isn’t coming back. Ever. Wall of text ahead, just saying. TL;DR at the end :P

That’s not to say that kong is dying – it’s not, it’s still expanding. And it’s not to say that current Flash games are ‘worse’ than in the past, because browser based gaming is more popular than ever.

But there’s been a shift in what people play and what’s on Kong. People don’t play idle MMOs just because there’s so many here – there are so many here because that’s what people want to play right now. They’re also the only genre of browser based game that’s profitable in itself. Most free games rely on either ad revenue, which pays around $2 per 1,000 plays for a fully exclusive game on Kong with all APIs. A game that gets 100,000 plays won’t even make a month’s rent in most countries. On the other hand, if just 100 of those players – 1% – spend $5, it’s made $500 straight up, more than double the ad revenue and without Kong’s requirements for exclusivity.

In app purchases in single player games don’t make the same sort of money. The appeal of them in MMOs is that they give you an advantage, over other people. Everyone says they’d like to buy cosmetics or support a game with donations, but when you actually have a game that relies on these, it rarely makes any money.

The Flash scene originally become popular on Newgrounds, first with animation and then games. That long ago, this stuff was all done for free, not necessarily for fun, but not with the exception that it would make a profit either. Things split in two directions – animators like Egoraptor went to YouTube, which used to be fantastic for making money from animations (not anymore, which is why Egoraptor is gone and Arin Grump took his place). Game devs started making ad revenue, but the payouts NewGrounds offers are miniscule, $0.30ish per 1000 plays.

But sites started paying developers to put their logo in games; sponsorships. This was very popular for a while. Too popular. Many Flash sites overspent. Prices inflated beyond reasonable levels as people flocked to the scene to make and sell games. This is where we saw the best time for Flash games. But two things caused this to end. First, mobile gaming became a thing and many switched to that side of things. Secondly, naive business leaders on flash startups didn’t heed lessons learnt in the past by TV and movie studios – if you bid against someone you’ll often end up spending more than the property is worth. The bubble couldn’t last. the money had to come from somewhere in the end, and it turned out that there wasn’t enough of it.

At the same time, FlashGameLicense has to take some of the blame for this. Originally a site set up to help sponsors meet developers, they became a clearing house where a game’s profit potential was decided by the site staff, based on a generic set of ranking criteria that didn’t necessarily match real world performance. The bigger sponsors used FGL recommendations almost exclusively to make their buying decisions, and the best performing developers were given priority consideration and extra promotion by the staff, inflating their sale prices even more. “Our ratings tend to predict the price a game sells for,” they said – which was true, because sponsors ignored lower rated games unless they were a ‘budget’ publisher with less money to spend. At the top of the scale, prices increased as sponsors found themselves vying over the few highest rated games, with auction prices reaching tens of thousands dollars in some cases.

Where does this leave Flash games? Well, new developers kept jumping on board while publishers were suddenly paying less and less in sponsorship. The money wasn’t there anymore, unless you were one of the very top devs. Clickthroughs weren’t the same, and people were switching to new technology anyway. People are used to inapp purchases on mobile games; they’re used to paying up front for a game that’s up for download, and those games are often more polished, rounded experiences than the Flash games we used to enjoy. Those same Flash games couldn’t compete in terms of audience appeal anymore, and even if they could, they didn;t make money in the same way.

But idle games were always popular. House Idle was great. Anti Idle, even in its first iteration, has always been fantastic. Sponsors didn’t understand the appeal and declined to pay for them, but it was only a matter of time before someone decided to try to monetise that. Farmville was the turning point, really. A game that your mom could play, and not only that, would spend real money on, in a genre that half of Asia is beyond addicted to. Suddenly the market for browser based games became indescribably huge (that’s not to say your mom is indescribably huge, but everyone’s moms together and all of China, that starts to add up). Studios suddenly have a way to almost print money. Clone or license the engine for a generic idle MMO, reskin it, and launch with a fanfare and people will play it. Does that make it a good game? It sure makes it a successful game.

The end result of all this isn’t as cut and dry as it seems, though. Because the devs who are still making browser based games went for bigger and better. There are some incredible games in Flash available on Kong, many of them quite new. But they’re incredible in the sense that they’re comparable to mobile games – and mobile devices are so powerful now they can easily run full PS2 games and beyond. THese aren’t the small scale games we used to get so many of. Many of them require a lengthy time commitment to play, not to mention reasonable PC hardware to run well. Why? Because games like we used to see getting badged on Kong don’t get a chance anymore. Smaller games don’t get 5/5 ratings anymore. They get a few plays, then drop away. Look through early badged games on Kong and you’ll find so many of them that just wouldn’t be seriously considered for badges anymore – 5 minute timekillers, games with awful graphics, and so on. The players – you – want more than that now.

I don’t think there’s a fix for this. MMOs are another bubble, a fad that will fade. No trending genre in history has ever maintained its market dominance in the long run, in gaming or otherwise. But that doesn’t bring back the feeling that Kong used to have, and I don’t think that can be brought back on a large scale.

What can you, personally do if you don’t like this? Three things.

1. Rate, comment, email developers that makes games you like. Donate if you can afford to. Even if the game isn’t perfect. Especially if it isn’t perfect. If you downvote games for not being perfect, or your comments are mainly negative, you’re contributing to the problem. Constructive feedback doesn’t need to be criticism at all.
2/ Go out of your way to find smaller games that don’t get much attention, and be more accepting of them. Games where the dev has worked hard on something simple, or reached for the stars and fallen an inch short. These games don’t make any money or get any attention, and if you ignore them, the developer will never take another shot at it. In short, praise what you want to see more of.
3. Persuade your friends and chat regulars to do the same.

Kong will never go back to feeling like one community again, it’s too big. But it doesn’t need to. All you need is a reasonable sized group, probably all in one chatroom, who share the same enthusiasm for games outside of what’s popular (without being super hipster about it) and you have a community again.

I fully expect most people to skip most of my post so here’s the TL;DR: Flash games don’t make money anymore; you can still find games like Kong used to have but you need to look a bit harder; rate them up, tel lthe devs you like them, tell your friends to play them so that they have a chance to become popular again.

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Kongregate is dying: How we can fix this

Originally posted by ilneutrino:

6. Meh, partially true. I love how everyone here keeps going about “get a new pc” as if that has any significant bearing on lag – it doesn’t. Most of the games here are not cpu intensive. I’d suggest that you get better internet, that will certainly help. With that being said, you also have to be aware that that flash games are outdated and they’re subject to lag if the back-end coding is not up to standards (AS3, SQL’s, API). Poor knowledge about coding will produce a game that can be extremely laggy and unresponsive.

Most Flash games are very CPU intensive because they run exclusively on the CPU. Only some of the more modern ones offload work to the GPU, and even then, that requires a relatively modern GPU to process it. Generally, on an older CPU, Flash is going to take up most of it’s resources, and if you’re using a system that also only has 1gb of RAM (eg an old laptop), you’re going to find a significant amount of that in use as well. This is why Adobe doesn’t allow it on mobile devices, its so CPU intensive that it drains the battery. SQL is a database system which most Flash games don’t use at all.

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / strong arm tactic to get us to kong plus

Although Bobby is the only person really saying this outright, the reality is this: people don’t buy cosmetics. It’s the same with donations: people don’t donate. Everyone says that they’d donate to support a developer, or that they don’t like pay2win stuff, or that microtransactions / IAP should only be for cosmetics, but nobody buys these. If you want to sell cosmetics, they have to confer some sort of status on the buyer. Donations need to be begged for. Even then, in either case, the numbers don’t come close to what people say they’d spend.

But here’s what’s sad about it all. Dobby is happy to pay for Pogo Premium. Kind of ironic, since Jim Greer quit Pogo to make a better gaming site. So what does Pogo offer for premium members?
- you can earn badges
- you can play every game on the site
- you can do quests
- adfree
- for $40/annual

In case anyone isn’t seeing the problem here, it’s this. For more money than K+, Pogo sells the same features that Kong gives away for free. And yet Bobbs considers Pogo+ to be good value but not K+.

Would you like to pay for badges and quests on Kong? Probably not. But this is why private chats are K+ only when other sites have them for free. And this is also why profile customization is K+ only. And this is why you can be sure that any of the new features Kong adds that people would really like, will be being considered as K+ only options. You might think that all the forum regulars would leave in protest if Kong added bookmarks, notifications, velocity exemption and signatures as K+ only, but the reality is that people would stay, and they’d pay for them. And a site elsewhere that offers all those things for free would not be able to sell its own adfree package because people wouldn’t see the value in it.

In short, ff, like Obby, you say you “need value” for your money, then the stuff that’s added to make up the value is stuff that will be restricted from free accounts. There is no other way to make a premium service that has value.

The point that too many people don’t seem to understand is that most websites need to make money some way or other. And if you won’t pay without being strongarmed into it, you’re going to get strongarmed into it – except you’re not, because you don’t have to be here. Go to a competitor if you must. If you’re not making money for a site that needs money, you won’t be missed. And when people say that, it’s not to be a dick about it, it’s because the site that you want for free simply won’t exist if everything is given away from free, so whether you’re here or not becomes irrelevant. If the site closes, you won’t be here anyway, and neither will the people who were willing to pay.

Kong is big enough that freeloaders are still useful to them, as FlayingCat pointed out. But a free, adblocking user is not as useful as a free, ad-viewing member. So don’t expect the site to consider you as a priority when you’re here with the attitude that you, and only you, matter; or that you should be able to have a completely free, adfree, experience on someone else’s dollar.

PS: someone claimed ads 10 years ago were less intrusive, and I felt the need to point out that that’s not the case. In 2005 most sites still ran popup ads, but most major browsers blocked them by default.

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / 100K (Rounded up) Games Celebration Giveaway [Over Now]

So, I’m going to do the cliché “what does that word mean” thing:

I look at the following people with pleasure: JayZeeM50one, Skaterfly. I frequently admire Jay’s garden and that is definitely not a euphemism of any sort.

Best mods are VforVendetta, MrGravy, and sometimes Tecnotruck. Skullbat is cool too.

also flyingcat because this thread is something nice for the community :))))

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Are Hobbyist games doomed to forever be "under judgement"?

The problem is nothing to do with the types of games and everything to do with how Kong now shows new games to users. Or doesn’t, really.

  • new games are hidden from everyone by default.
  • Kong only shows new games with a 3.5+ rating
  • there is nothing on the site to indicate that genuinely new games exist at all (to find them you have to go through the filter / sort options yourself)
  • 99% of new games are reskins, spam, or tutorial games, which is why Kong is reluctant to display them anywhere
  • games do get a rating before 50 rates, now, but it’s weighted low. So if you’re slow to get those early ratings, you also find that your rating is below what it should be, making it almost impossible to get anyone to play.

In the past, new games were much more a focus of the site, meaning most games got a fairer start. Gradually, starting when the new profiles rolled out, the focus was removed from new games and placed more and more onto games that were already making money for Kong. That makes sense for Kong, and I don’t have an issue with them promoting the games that bring in traffic, but it takes something away from what Kong used to be. I used to really enjoy looking through the new games queue and playing all the new stuff that was uploaded – but it’s not entirely Kong’s fault. The new games queue looks a lot like any other app store, it’s full of spam and garbage, and the games that are genuinely good and being overlooked are a very small percentage of that.

There are some possible fixes for the problem, but whether the development time is worth it for the small number of good games that are being missed is another discussion entirely.

My preferred solution would be to offer a $5 frontpage ad placement, only available to games with fewer than 150 ratings. As soon as the game reaches that number of ratings, it’s removed from the spot. The payment is small enough that any serious dev can afford it, but high enough that the views from the ad alone won’t cover it in ad revenue. It would also mean that people uploading tutorials, junk, etc, probably wouldn’t bother with it.

Other options:

  • curate the new games list and promote good games early (this happens for big name developers already but it’s not like they need the boost). THe drawback to this is that someone has to play all the games to find the good ones.
  • clear out spam, junk, reskin accounts so that the new games queue isn’t full of garbage
  • limit uploads to one per user per week, and prevent alts uploading games, to make the new games queue more useful
  • feature all new games by default, hide them from the queue entirely if the rating doesn’t hold up
  • offer more incentives to rate games with under 50 ratings, to give more games a rating. For example, double points, badges for rating X number of unrated games ,etc.

PS: I didn’t have time to try your game yet but I rated it 5/5 anyway, pretty good bet that when I do play it that will stay the same.

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Holy crap

How did this thread become so hostile??

Any volunteers to do an epic voiceover reading of it? :D

Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / Saving a OT user's life or getting laid?

Originally posted by JayZeeM50one:
Originally posted by Haruhion:
Originally posted by JayZeeM50one:

i choose both

getting laid with the oter’s corpse?

getting laid with the oter i save

help i need saving

Flag Post

Topic: Game Programming / Gamemaker Studio

nope :(

Flag Post

Topic: Game Programming / Unity or Flash

Use Flash if you only want to put the game on Kongregate. Reasons are:
1. you already know how to use it
2. the majority of Kong players still prefer and expect games to be in Flash.
3. it works fine for Kong stuff
4. Kong won’t stop supporting it.

Use Unity if any of these are true:
1. you want to release the game on mobile, downloadable, etc.
2. you want to make it 3d
3. you need / want to make use of the asset store for pre-made characters, scenery, lighting, etc
4. you’re exceptionally good at Unity in comparison to Flash, meaning the game would be high enough quality for users to be okay switching browser to run it.

Use Unity and convert to HTML5 if:
1. Eh idk. I’m reluctant to recommend this. If you want to use HTML5, right now it would be better to learn how to use WebGL yourself, rather than relying on Unity to convert your code. Additionally, I agree with Aiurs that it’s too early to make a serious game exclusively with HTML5 – it requires up to date software & hardware for anything fancy, and many people won’t have this. There are some amazing things that can be done with WebGL but that’s pointless if your users can’t use it.

Flag Post

Topic: Kongregate / Are there any guidelines for game messages?

Dev messages require a high rating & number of plays for the game to send at all, and are subject to these restrictions:

You can message your players up to one time each week. Please only send messages about [game name] or sequels on Kongregate, they cannot contain any information about other games or any links or promotions off of Kongregate.

Players will have the ability to turn off messages from your game. As such, you should be careful to be moderate with the number of updates you send out. Keep them interesting and relevant, messages should only be sent when an item is truly newsworthy and useful to a player of the game.

Messages will be manually approved by a Kongregate administrator, so it may take up to 48 hours for messages to be sent to players. For more information about the best practices and policies of this messaging tool, visit the developer documentation.

Messages sent by players via a game, like “Hey rinkydinky, Spambob has sent you a free teddybear in Horror Teddy MMO” have less restrictions on them.