Recent posts by DiogoC19 on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Sandbox Hero / Suggestions!

Give us option to not hear the music, but still have sword slash and other sounds. in both when playing and when creating a map.

Also, give us an option to not play music in a map we are creating.

Also, give us an option to change the music the scenario plays, or to start or stop playing the music.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Debating Gay Rights

Point A

The purpose of marriage is not to regulate interactions between a man and a woman, but rather to symbolize the union of two consenting adults and grant them a few civil rights

a – If the law of marriage does not regulate the role each member of an union plays, neither does grants sexual rights, neither play any role in their sexual live at all. Than two heterossexual males can marry for the sake of benefits, regarding their private life.

b – If the law does not regulate the private life of married individuals, then, treason, cannot be a reason for divorce.

c – If a man betrays his wife, the wife have a reason to divorce. If the man, in his defense, proves that she denied him sex. A court must understand his action was justified. If there is no such law that grants him sex with his wife, he neither will be able to divorce, neither to move on to another girl, and no court will be able to justify his betrayal.

You claim that there are certain gender roles in a marriage, such as the female partner being the housewife… it is up to both participants of the marriage to decide who does what, when… and when and why to divorce.

d – in a case where both members of the family refuses to, lets say, provide. And they argue with each other over this without consent to the point where one of them, ends up in court asking for divorce, while the other, resist divorce (for whatever reason, as it is common).

e – how will the court decide who is right and who is wrong? and who was infringing upon who’s right? Which one of them was the one, that was not complying with the duties of marriage?

f – And if the law doesn’t care about who was wrong or right. how will a person that feels to be a victim of injustice from his partner, advocate for legal advantage over the process of divorce?

g – If the law doesn’t regulate sex, neither roles, how does marriage differ from a contract between two people with no love related, where Such contract regulates nothing about their duties and rights in their partnership, and any one of them can end such a partnership whenever it wants without any consequence into its divorce procedure?


Point D

We do differ into some things in this section, to such extent that we hardly have common ground in order to do a proper debate. in which case, I will only answer some arguments, where I do find some common ground.

Men and women do not necessarily ‘complement’ each other

Well, I would argue that we are complementary, duo to:
a – A man is stronger and violent, attentive of its surroundings (objects, shapes and possible threads), answer threads with a physical thread posture, Lower voice Frequency and more threatening, more aware and afraid of enemies, better at watching border and doing patrol, better at math, more skilled at differentiating one physical material or tissue, better at discriminating sounds, better at discriminating a visual input, vectors, spacial thinking, engineering, better at melee fighting, as so as to any other kind of fighting, better at war strategy, Does have more hair, more energetic, bigger, less sensible skin (usually a little darker in many races, but not all), and feels a natural impulse at heroism, they desire to own what they consider a good women.

In comparison:
b – A woman is fragile, more likely to choose peace, rather than justice at a violent price, attentive to other people emotions, skilled at nurturing people feelings, skilled at having intimacy with both males and females, naturally better at nursing sick people, more emotionally sensible with children as to not hurt their feelings or sound to harsh, Natural vocation in taking care of luxuries and comfort (such as bed and clothes), Natural vocation at design decoration and dressing rules, more worried about the cleaning of the house, More worried about physical and dressing impression, more worried about bruises in their kids, better at etiquette, they have natural silicone, they have boobs, and they produce milk, their skin is way more sensible, they have better hearing of high frequencies sounds, they can sleep well while listening to low frequency sounds, they have periods, they admire what they consider a good men.

I would say, that if we were more opposite than this, our intelligence level would not handle such difference, to the point that we would be alien to each other, and not desire one another.

The killer one: You claim children must be shielded from harsh realities – though I fail to see how homosexual love is a harsh reality -, but you are against ‘gay adoption’? The alternative to that adoption is to remain without parents or a home. There are not enough heterosexual couples willing to adopt foster children. What is harsher than that?

The alternative to gay adoption is to remain without parents or a home, and yet, it is very common to take kids away from their parents whenever they are considered to be a bad influence to their kids. Following that logic, we shouldn’t do so, because there is not enough places for that kid to go live in, so it should remain with its parents, which is not the best thing to do.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Debating Gay Rights

I… Just don’t know what to say, this is all really foreign to me, and not in the way one would expect.

Yes, I know. Having an international kind of raising, even though I never left Brazil, I am not used to think as any nationality in particular, nor consider any particular problem that is only happening in a specific Country. At least, in those arguments raised by me.

That being said. such arguments in my post, mainly the anti-civil-union arguments, are heavily inspired, and learned, from a Brazilian Philosopher, Olavo de Carvalho, who gives philosophy classes through videos, and often make videos about conservative values, and why.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Debating Gay Rights

What’s the point in “regulating” marriage?

If you say there is no point in regulating an union, then there is no point in having a law for it.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / A Group of Conservatives

karmakoolkid, as I told before, I see your posts as nothing, but a non-contribution, and embarassment to this thread.

In this post, you are just “inviting me” to get out of the forum, and go somewhere else, given that other places may have something in common with this thread.

I would like to point out, that if this act of yours, stand as something acceptable. I could feel free, to do the same thing to many other users, everytime they start a thread, whose topic is not unique to kongreagate’s forums.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Debating Gay Rights

As long as they love and care about each other, what does it matter their role in the marriage is

If you don’t care about the law enforcing roles to you and your counterpart, then a law cannot regulate your union.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / A Group of Conservatives

Hi 1132, I appreciate your concern. but this group is not to be a group that would be interacting in this forum. As I explained in another post, this is just so I can meet them and organize ourselves.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Debating Gay Rights

Hi. Popperian have invited me to a debate on the positions I have claimed at the other topic.
Since the other topic is not the place to debate such things (it would be off-topic and not the intended goal of that thread) I am creating this one.

First, I would like to explain, that I had searched 3 pages of the serious discussion forum for such a thread, and there is none. Except for “gay is sin” which is about Jesus, and the op just didn’t seems very motivated, or serious.

That being said, I think this Thread is very original.

########################
########################

Against “gay rights”

“gay rights” being:

A – The right for homossexual civil marriage.
B – To forbidden a church to refuse to make the ceremony of union.
C – Protection against violence and/or discrimination.
D – The right to adopt a child.

##############################
B – I am against such propositions because it goes against the right to exercise religion.
If a church can no longer refuse a certain practice as evil, than there will be no ground to protect individual choices and beliefs, leading to a tyranny of minorities or majorities, where individuals can not deviate from opinion.

##############################
C – I am against such proposition because a homossexual is covered by human rights and civil rights just as anybody else. And if someone is beaten, or discriminated because of something, such as their weird food tastes, or a body feature, it would consist in infringement of their rights.
Also: The ammount of violence (in Brasil, where I live), against homossexual, is way less than against heterossexuals (proportionally, not only in total), and they are not “hate” related. That means that if the occurrence of violence against a certain group, would ultimately mean hate, than the only group suffering from a significant ammount of hate are the heterossexuals, which, is obviously not true.

##############################
A – I would prefer that instead of having one big federal government that rules people lives, we had one that only cares about ruling states and taking care of foreign affairs, and such laws, such as marriage would be a case to states, and in their turn, could let this to cities.
Making so, that a certain city, if inhabited by homossexuals, could grant themselves such civil right.

That being said:
1 – The purpose of marriage law is to regulate the interaction between the union of a male and a female, and their sex* lives. The rights and duties of each member of the family institution.
2 – It doesn’t exist *sex between individuals of same sex.
3 – An union between a man and a woman has very clear roles that can be regulated, such as
a) a woman having vocation to motherhood, cooking and taking care of the house and kids
b) a man having the duty to provide and protect the family.
c) both man and woman having to provide sex to each other, in the traditional way.
Roles that, while may not be applied so rigidly, one can start a legal process against its counterpart, for not doing its part, such as:
(examples)
w – A woman refuses to have sex with its wife.
In this case, the man has the right to divorce. The same thing if a man is refusing sex.
x – A man is steryl.
In this case, the woman has the right to divorce. The same thing if a woman is steryl.
y – A man asks for anal penetration.
In this case, the woman has the right to divorce. Same thing if it was a woman wanting to do something, as sticking its fingers in the man anus or asking him to penetrate hers.
z – A woman refuses to cook, or cook really bad.
In this case, if confirmed that the woman’s cooking is indeed terrible, the man has the right to divorce. If it was a man who fails at provide, protect, or do any of it’s role’s duty, the woman has the legal right to divorce.

4 – An union between two individuals of the same sex, does not have clear roles. Therefore, cannot be regulated.
(examples)
w – One of the man refuses to have his anus penetrated by his man companion.
In this case, which man is defined as passive, and which one is defined as active? Since they are booth males, none of them have opposite roles to the other one, so there is no such thing as, one having the duty to offer his anus, and the other one, his penis.
x – One of the woman refuses to cook, or cook really bad
In this case, since they are both woman, which one has the duty to cook to the other one? and which one has the duty to provide?
y – One of the man has penis potency problems.
In this case, which one of them were supposed to use their penises, and, since anal penetration is not sex*, how can you regulate the duty and requirements of each counterpart?
z – One of them want oral sex and the other refuses to do it.
In this case, oral sex isn’t a right, not even in a traditional marriage. How would you regulate who is responsible for providing oral sex, if it is not even a right, or that partner, never had that in mind when “marring” in the first place.

All cases above, there is no clear reason for divorce, or who is infringing upon who’s right’s.

5 – An union between two individuals of the same sex differ in category from the union of two individuals of opposite sex.

*sex – The definition of sex used here is: interaction between two individual’s sex organs, of opposite sex, which, in theory, leads to reproduction.

##############################
D – Man and woman complement each other. Man and woman are equal in humanity and dignity, but different in nature. The human race exists as male and female, and the differences between sex gives to humanity a profound vision, which wouldn’t exist otherwise.

gathered pieces from:
“The Gender Agenda”
1997, Vital Issues Press,
Lafayette, Lousiana

That being said:

1 – A child is a human being that is not fully developed and it has a fragile mind and need to be shielded from certain realities, so it can grow in a simple environment free from corruption of good customs and traditions.

2 – Any person that holds publicly, a significant and uncommon immoral behavior, that may influence their kids, should not have the right to adopt a child.
(examples)
w – that includes very troubled parents who does drugs or alcohol, to such extent, that may affect their child.
x – Violent parents.
y – A dishonest parent, to such extent, that is considered dangerous to the moral being of the child, giving that the child would be very badly influenced by the “lessons” he is supposed to learn from his parents.

3 – Every child, should have access to the role model of male, and female, so as to give them reference as to what to copy, and what to expect from the opposite sex.

4 – A homosexual man, is the opposed of a role model of male. As a homosexual woman is the opposed of a role model of female.

5 – A homosexual social interaction with their partners, is the opposite of how an exemplar male, or female, should have interactions with their counterpart of opposite sex when they grow up.

6 – By exposing a child to homosexuality, as an acceptable behavior, you are doing the opposite of teaching them good customs and traditions. You are influencing them as to become the opposite as to what it would be ideal.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / A Group of Conservatives

SWATLLAMA, the punisher52, Hi.

I don’t think that a group should be as strict as to everyone having the same exact thought on a list of things.
I intend this group to be made of people who recognize themselves as conservatives on most of these issues.
In which case, if you dissent from some, but agrees with most, I believe you are welcome :D
Also, if you want to contribute by citing some other conservative issue that you think should be added to the list, you are invited :D

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / A Group of Conservatives

Karmakoolkid, you are not speaking on-topic. All your “contribution” is against the existance of the thread itself, not an actual contribution to it.
You feel offended by this very thread, so you attack it.

So is kasic, getting off-topic in discussing the validity of conservatives proposition, or the proposition of this thread itself, embarassing any attempt from a contribution towards the goal that was intended.

It was obvious not intended to be a discussion about conservatives vs liberals, and a discussion about it, is off-topic.

Unfortunately, one cannot moderate its own posts, or else I wouldn’t allow deviations from the intended goal neither a direct attack against the reasons for the thread to exist.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / A Group of Conservatives

well, this thread was created because, as I said, I won’t be creating such a group on my own and I need to hear from other people that would like the idea, so that I know more or less how is it that such a group can be created.
I don’t think such a group should be interacting here in this forum after it is created. That would be very insensible.
So… this thread is to announce the plans, get to know who is interested and discuss its formation.
Now, I am well aware that some people might feel offended by the very fact that such idea is in motion. But I just don’t know how to keep something only between a targeted group, if I don’t know who they are.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / How do you say ''Merry Christmas and Happy New Year'' on your language?

Feliz Natal e um Próspero Ano Novo! (Happy Christmas and a prosperous new year) – Portuguese.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / A Group of Conservatives

Originally posted by tenco1:ALso this doesn’t really belong here, but whatever, I’m just getting that out of the way.

This is Serious Discussion Forum. You might be confusing it with another section.

Immortal7777, yeah, I realized when I was creating this thread how difficult would be, giving the language barrier (definitions of words) from country to country. Even though, the position might be the same. And yes, as soon as I have something more defined, I will give you a shout :P

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / A Group of Conservatives

Well, maybe the language difference between me (Brasil) and you (probably US) is creating confusion.

I thought I would be clear, specially to North Americans, since I watch a lot of their political content. but here I go:

“minority rights” are those special rights that they give to some minority group, which they don’t need, because they are already considered humans and citizens, and all rights they need are under the human rights and citizenship rights. Anything more would be considered privilege, not rights.

About affirmative action: I am not from USA. so I won’t comment. (deleted previously)

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / A Group of Conservatives

Hi.
I would like to make a group of like-minded people, and since I am a gamer, I will start here.
But since this group would contain people from all over the world, the name conservatives may be a little misplaced, since conservatism, in some definitions, may be different from Nation to Nation.

But before I start doing anything, I would like to hear some feedback, from conservatives :D, or maybe you can contact me privately.

Temporary definition of this Group of Conservatives:

1) For traditional marriage.
2) Against feminism.
3) Against “gay rights”.
4) Against “minority rights”.
5) Against socialism and communism.
6) Against gun control.
7) Against abortion on demand

→ “minority rights” are those special rights that they give to some minority group, which they don’t need, because they are already considered humans and citizens, and all rights they need are under the human rights and citizenship rights. Anything more would be viewed as privilege, not rights.

→ Man and woman complement each other. Man and woman are equal in humanity and dignity, but different in nature. The human race exists as male and female, and the differences between sex gives to humanity a profound vision, which wouldn’t exist otherwise.
gathered pieces from:
“The Gender Agenda”
1997, Vital Issues Press,
Lafayette, Lousiana

That being said:
→ Traditional Marriage: A man, a woman and their children. The man being the leader of the family.

→ Abortion on demand: Is when abortion can be done on demand, without any specific or serious reason, such as rape, or when the woman has the risk of losing her life. That is, they can abort the baby simply because they don’t want to have him/her.

#################
I don’t think that a group should be as strict as to everyone having the exact same thought on a list of things.
I intend this group to be made of people who recognize themselves as conservatives on most of these issues.
In which case, if you dissent from some, but agrees with most, I believe you are welcome :D
Also, if you want to contribute by citing some other conservative issue that you think should be added to the list, you are invited :D

 
Flag Post

Topic: Mech Conquest / Bugs

At main menu screen:
click at Mech and then shop (very fast) you will open up booth.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Mech Conquest / Bugs

1) typo → try to enhance a hero at max-level : “This Mech part has already max level and cannot be enhanced further” except that is a hero, not a mech part.

2) another → ENHANCEMENT COST “this is how much credits you currently have. it costs 25 credits to sacrifice each part” except that is 50.

3) Sometimes when attacking the enemy using my “CITY MOWER (medium range at max-level)” it does the sound as if the sound of bullets is being played many times at once. and it comes out like a chainsaw against metal. Most times that doesn’t happen and I don’t see anything different from when it does.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Mech Conquest / Suggestions Thread.

Originally posted by aNonnyMuse:


3. For those stuck pre-battle at loading screen, refreshing should refund the fuel and maybe reset winstreak to prevent abuse or have a button appear after a minute or two that allows you to exit to battle page with no consequences.

No. Don’t reset winstreak.

In order to prevent abuse, let the way it is. wasting fuel. Fuel is much less important than winstreak. Seriously!! imagine that I lose my winstreak over a bug or a connection issue!!! no way!


1) Another way of getting platinum medals. right now, only those that spend diamonds can get one. and even those that spend might not be able too… I Know the game is about competition. but lets not add too much competition over a medal please. give us some way (perhaps every nth of winstreaks?) or even better: a certain amount of total points of contribution, inter-galaxy.

Just make it so more people in the top 10 rank of the same faction gain gold medals, and the top 3 gain platinum. or else, there would be no team-work spirit!



2) A way of deleting friends.

3) A bronze medal for ace. (or else, whats the point? 100 credits becomes worthless the effort in mid game, and in late game I am pretty sure you gain tons of money for base attack)

or… even better! please don’t do this!
lets solve problem 1 and 3 at the same time.
every time a person, a robot ace in all fights, he gains a medal that might be a platinum medal.
Noooo!!! only robots or people with gaming mouses could do that enough. it is unfair. trust me!


4) As it stands right now, economy research is pointless. I completely regret investing on it. Need to make that research better or else, there will be no point investing on it.

why not give better rate for item draws for those who have economy?


5) Trade system, so we can trade our equips, with upgrade included, and also trade like: 1 equip for 2 or 3 equips. that way there would be a reason for a person to trade a 4 star equip over some 3 star equips, and if seller agrees, its a deal! :D
also, we could trade like: 1 pilot over a lot of pilots or one pilot over a lot of equips. that way, you can have an use for a good stared pilot you won’t use, and you get a lot others to upgrade some other…

also: charge a fee on diamonds for a trade to happen? (one side pays the fee, no matter what side), that would give you devs some benefit over this system :P Phorton’s Idea

or… even better!

Solve both problems 4 and 5 by: creating a trade system that takes time for offers to ‘appear’, both selling and buying. and with economy research your delay is reduced.

That would give economists an advantage and a reason for that research.


6) All kongregate users should be allies against facebook users.

7) Better rewards at the end of the war. because face it. 10 silver medals aren’t worth much when you are strong enough to get to 10th position. And whoever gets to 3rd position probably wouldn’t have too much use of a gold medal anyway would be better off with more than 2 gold medals.

Someone said that Planetary rewards should be based on contribution, rather than position. that seemed like a good idea for me. I don’t like the idea of team-mates fighting over to get 1st position or the top 3 in a war.

8) “Add a 3rd or a 4th faction into the war. That would make things more interesting.” Phorton

9) Assign an ‘Officer’ for each faction of a war that is based on who has more power, or whatever. He has the ability to ‘signal’ a planet that he want people to attack or defend. If an officer doesn’t want that burden, he might just appoint someone else.

or…

10) Create a faction chat and forget about suggestion number 9.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Mech Conquest / Add Me

hbg-mfdnj

 
Flag Post

Topic: BattleCry / Post New Units Ideas Here

1. Elf: 1 pierce dmg, 1 pierce resist, -1blunt resist, 3 def. uncommon.
2. Night Elf: 1 resist for all magic dmg, except poison, 2 or 3 def, rare.
3. WarDog: 3 pierce dmg, 1 slash resist, 1 pierce resist, no slots, 4 def common or uncommon.
4. Troll (The big one, LotR’s style): +3 blunt dmg, def 15, recover 1 def every 2 sec, unable to use shield or armor, but can use any weapon and special (except mounts), rare.
5. Kobold: -2 blunt resistance, def 1. common.
6. Dwarf: +2 blunt resistance, +1 ice resistance, def 6, common-uncommon
7. Mountain Giant: 3 blunt dmg, def 17 (idk, lol, some high def), can’t equip armor or mounts. Legendary


In lore, dwarves are good against orcs and giants. :P

 
Flag Post

Topic: BattleCry / Bugs

Originally posted by Naelwyn:

Spell cast time reduction works on the Legendary healing mace, but not spell time increase, making it an exception to countering other magical issues and thus problematic.

individual equips works.
ultima staff and anti-magic items doesn’t.


All my vermins (unequiped) die in the 3rd attack of my Xonax’s Gnarled Staff.

 
Flag Post

Topic: BattleCry / Suggestions for game

Originally posted by Gnougat:

My suggestion is for the unicorn to have piercing damage. I mean, unicorns are extremely useless, and it makes no sense for them NOT to use the big horn on their head.

Agreed on the fact that Unicorn is underpowered!


I think there should be a way of saving armies formation (including the creation of units) so you can completely change (load) your army from one thing, to another in one click!


There should be other categories of battles, such as 250 points, 500 points, 1500, 2000 and maybe: unlimited (probably unranked)

 
Flag Post

Topic: BattleCry / Army changing out of nowhere

whenever that happens, just reload untill it changes back to your army

 
Flag Post

Topic: BattleCry / Looking for contributors to Battlecry Wikia

well, I am happy to announce, that all the items sections are now updated.
Thats right! We have a profile picture to all items :P

 
Flag Post

Topic: BattleCry / FAQ

As UndeadDraco said, it is usefull to create legendary suiciders with cursed ring when dealing against archers that does considerable dmg but not so much, and protects itself with stacks of meathshield. since you would want your terrorist to die as soon as possible.