Recent posts by sword_bloodfxs on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Card Monsters / Please Change Elite League Match Selection

Agreed act, i thought that randomizing would be a straightforward solution that should be relatively easy to implement. Meanwhile on another note, i think that the duel system could also be changed to promote players to play regularly.Currently, i think the top few players are pulling away from the rest of the pack,we have situations where players are just playing duels on selective days to maximize daily rewards and thus they dont climb up the duel ladder coz its not in their best interest to do so.

One possible solution would be to reward the top few positions on a separate daily reward so as to incentivise players to climb up the duel ladder.Right now the top few are about few thousand points above the lowest player in elite, we can have a system where its possible for the lower players to gain points faster then the top few so they could play catch up.This solution would at least compensate the top few players in terms of them not being able get daily top 5(who may feel frustated/aggreived with the current system).

 
Flag Post

Topic: Card Monsters / Please Change Elite League Match Selection

You are definitely not alone actuaryal, you should know who are the ones bugged by this situation far longer than you. Its just that I had asked lamatiel way back when would duel changes be made to rectify this situation and he admittedly mentioned that duel changes are way below the priority ladder for the developers. I just dont harbour hope for any kind of changes to be made speedily.If anything, the fact that it has taken this long before another person brought up this issue goes to show that perhaps the developers feel that they are justified in ignoring/deprioritizing this problem as this affects a very limited pool of players.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Card Monsters / Card Balancing Issues

i dont think its a bad reference to compare it to m-80, given both are quite similar in terms of use, but the situation now has been that m-80 which is widely considered better than pipes even prior to the drop in cost, is now cheaper and more useful than before. Given both cards are considered unique, i can think of a few alternatives to alleviate the situation.
1. make m-80 cost 4- which is difficult since edge uses a point system so if the cost point was tweaked, it would affect other cards as well
2. remove the unique status on pipes-its not a game changer anymore and its quite difficult to play 2 pipes in the deck
3. drop pipe cost to 3-as an alternative to cards such as m-80 but there are camps that feel cost 3 is too little(perhaps both cards having 3.5 cost seems to be more reasonable but unless edge start to implement what lama and bulwahr mentioned in terms of multiplying the card cost by a factor of 10, its not an option yet)

 
Flag Post

Topic: Card Monsters / Card Balancing Issues

Just want to put my 2 cents worth on a card which i think needs reviewing as well-bagpipes. Previously when it was 2 cost, many players complained it was too op and this was true, however the suggestion to make it 4 cost, imo at that time was quite overbalanced. In view that this card has a unique status and other unique usables such as m-80 has even dropped in cost as well,should the card cost for bagpipes still be at 4?Of course i may be biased here since i own this card, but im of the opinion that 3 cost is reasonable, so i would like to hear the opinion of others regarding this, i spoke to justanewhand previously and she thought that 3 was reasonable as well.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Card Monsters / Changes to Duels - Opponent Selection

Just to answer wildwest, nope it happened to me too. i usually encountered the same few decks for duels,yours,justanewhand,pfuel,opera etc. Hoping for a change from the developer but i doubt they will respond quickly.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Card Monsters / alt accounts/ cheaters of power

@Wildwest99-hmm i think you misunderstand my previous post. The purpose of my previous post in a nutshell was to say that the method that msr6 said I agree it can be good evidence to show that alt accounts were made. However, for my case, I wish to say I did not use alt accounts, the players under my ip address as I had mentioned, many were players who did not even play card monsters(if you had checked).

@bladejay- I forgotten who used the term already previously, but I “boosted” or “cheated”(in some players’ opinions) my way through but it was with a genuine player. I was bottom of the dragon rank list,I played with other players regularly so as to raise my points, get to bottom and raise it again. This process continues untill the other player achieves his objectives and finally I got “boosted”. My intention was not to boast(which i dont think i have done at all) or be at the top of dragon rank at all, I just want to unlock all cards in dragon first.

On another note, I wish to apologize to blaaaze firstly for mispelling his name in my previous post and also for making my last statement in the previous post. I wish to state I have no idea or evidence how he got his points, it was just speculation on my part and I hope he does not take offence.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Card Monsters / alt accounts/ cheaters of power

Hmm let me take the opportunity too to clear somethings on my end. I may be wrong but it seems both blaaze and wildwest99 had the impression that i use alt accounts. I feel its too premature to say that just because many people share the same ip address as me it means that those accounts must be my alts. If you check these accounts, you will realize that many of these accounts dont even play card monsters but swords and potions etc.

I do play dragon live regularly prior and some of the players i played regularly previously are maki321,bulwahr,notsocool. i feel they can attest that i do my share of dragon live regularly. As to how I get those points much more quickly, I may be wrong here again, but i suspect that i employ the same method as blaaze.