Recent posts by thepunisher52 on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Sixth Extinction

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:
Originally posted by thepunisher52:

I’m only intrested if another Ica age comes with in my life time and socail contract is torn and pissed upon, survival of the fittest ensues.

So, just like Pakistan everyday, but with snowballs?

Fuck off ya knob slobber.

Any way, in my opinion, Humans will adapt to it unless it just comes overnight.
There’ll be a hefty price paid in blood though.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Sixth Extinction

I’m only intrested if another Ica age comes with in my life time and socail contract is torn and pissed upon, survival of the fittest ensues.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / No on knows

No one knows what its like…To be a bad man…To be a sad man

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Actual Minds in Videogames

Originally posted by vikaTae:
::Sigh:: As everybody has misunderstood my OP, let’s try this again:

I’m not talking about extra scripting to represent free will, or extra voice acting to represent free will. What I’m talking about, is virtual embodiment. Putting the NPC in the world directly, so their senses interact with their environment, and their mind processes those senses. A bit like needs-based-AI except dialed up to

So your are saying that they upload mine yours and jhco’s brain in Skyrim engine and just wipe the memory of the fact from our uploaded intelligences. I think it will give me bloody good game play I’ll start a cult, .
But the best gameplay i would be able to get is when such can be accomplished with strategy games.
Imagine playing against Rommel or Montogmery or Patton.
Concept sure is intriguing.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun CONTROL issues

Originally posted by vikaTae:

See, it would be fine if anything more powerful than a personal sidearm was only available at a gun range (and not to leave the range), but for whatever strange reason that’s completely unacceptable to the US gun owning population at large.

I can understand the use of personal defense firearms particularly for physically weaker individuals who need an equaliser. I don’t understand the desire to own 50 or 60 firearms.

Just like there are art collectors, there are also the firearm collectors.
You are right, no one needs a 30 round full auto for personal safety, that is, unless you are in GTA universe.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun CONTROL issues

Originally posted by vikaTae:

The tank gun can be fired. However the shells are extremely hard to get and regulated out the wazoo and beyond. With that size barrel, a home-made shell would really not be a good idea. One mistake in making the shell, and you’ve blown up your own tank.

High altitude bombers aren’t exactly precison fighting machines. For those to be employed, you’re looking less at tyrannical government and more at complete genocide.

That’s a good point about the miniguns. I remember there was some hoo-hah a few years back that had the ‘minigun club of America’‘s knickers in a tizzy but I cannto remember what the issue was. A quick google search this afternoon however, did confirm that some miniguns are still being bought and sold. So if there is a ban, it’s not complete.

I think the argument about fighting government tyranny is more aimed at the police forces and civil administrations rather than flat-out taking on the standing military forces. Nowhere in their rhetoric does it say they plan to win against the federal military, just that they’ll give it all they’ve got.

I agree it’s daft, since here in the UK, we do the same thing: fight against government tyrannnty, but we do it with votes, and strikes and protests and sygnatory sheets. Guns are almost completely banned nationwise (some farmers are allowed shotguns, and most big cities have 3-4 armed officers in a strike team) yet we do great at limiting or reversing stupid government decisions without them.

I think they’re a crutch more than anything; a way of making disenfranchised individuals feel important, or powerful – an ego stroke, basically.

But I think they re damn fun to shoot
If I could have guns to fire down a range, I would have them. I don’t care about the hero fantasies or Govrn. Tyranny.
For I am allergic to heroism and if I ever that I’m being opressed by the govn., I’ll do something about it. Even then, violence will be the last resort kind of thing with no real hope of winning.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun CONTROL issues

Originally posted by vikaTae:
Originally posted by thepunisher52:

You know what is the most redicilous argument given by gun nuts? They want guns to fight govrn. tyrrany.
Bitch please, your guns can’t do jack shit against
this:
[image of a tank]

It is however legal for ordinary US citizens to own their own tanks.

Video of a ride in a privatly owned tank

and this
[image of a modern fighter jet]

Anti-aircraft missile launchers may be constitutionally protected arms.

hell, you have to be very lucky to cause some damage even against this
[image of a humvee]

This mini gun would do a lot of damge to a humvee.

The weapons are legal, what puts them out of the range of the average citizen is purely cost.

Regarding the tank, it can not possibly be armed unregulated, they must have disabled the gun.
Man Pads ain’t gonna do much against an high altitiude bomber which can bomb you back to your gran pa’s days.
If I remember corrrectly, Sale of new Miniguns has been banned as such there is a diminishing number of miniguns whci are old stock in the market.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Gun CONTROL issues

You know what is the most redicilous argument given by gun nuts? They want guns to fight govrn. tyrrany.
Bitch please, your guns can’t do jack shit against
this

and this

hell, you have to be very lucky to cause some damage even against this

You know when was the last time, fire arms went against a full fledged military?
In afghanistan and they and had to rely on *gorilla warfare, even then, most casualitie were from IEDs.
More over, do you really think that this guy’s gun is gonna help him in any way?

I refuse to believe that anyone can be so stupid to genuinely think that guns will keep the govrn. tyranny away.
So, be truthful to yourselves and to others and just say that you like shooting shit and every one who wants to stop you from shooting shit can fuck off.
Personaly, I prefer these guns over any other.

Damn, I just realised, that wrestling is kind of homo erotic.

*

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / E-cigarettes

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:

I thought we should make a new topic so that poor clickbait thread doesn’t keep getting sidetracked.

I argue that e-cigarettes [vaping] are cheaper, healthier and just plain superior to smoking. When I was smoking I used to hate those ex-smokers trying to convert all us smokers to quit. Now I guess I am one, but I have no plans to quit vaping – it may have helped me quit smoking, but I still like nicotine and still want to keep doing it, and now I can, with few of the problems of smoking, even if I do get stuck with the same legislation governing smoking.

Anyway, you can talk about the pros and cons here, or the possible dangers, or personal anecdotes, whatever. If you’re going to bring in claims proving it’s as bad or worse than smoking, you better be prepared to back it up. Personally, for me the largest con is that they are more attractive to children and youth than smoking. Not that I care about children, but some people apparently do and it hurts the industry when they moan about vaping as a gateway drug.

Noob, Real men go cold turkey and then come whimpering back in the warm embrace of cigarettes.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Man arrested for thought crime in UK

Muslims are slippery fingered little wotsits.

Slippery fingers eh?
Let’s see how they’ll like them slippery fingers around their throats.
Why you little…………..

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Man arrested for thought crime in UK

Originally posted by Hunter_616:

Back on the OP, the bloke was arrested for a Hate Crime. Now, I think the real debate here is not was it Hate Speech (because lets face it, demonising an entire religion for the actions of a small group of those people IS hate speech), but how far should “Free Speech” (an idea that we actually in the UK have no legal right to, interestingly enough) be allowed to go?

Actually the UK DOES have freedom of speech. As part of joining the EU, the Human Rights Act came into force in 2000. If/When we leave, it’ll be discarded, but right now we do have freedom of speech.

The main difference between our freedom of speech and the US’ freedom of speech however, is that ours has exceptions: We don’t have the right to hate speech, don’t have the right to use speech to harass an individual, don’t have the right to incite violence on race/religion/age/gender/etc sweeping categorical grounds, don’t have the right to advocate harm against the monarch or advocate to the general public for the destruction of public property (private property is fine). Don’t have the right to advocate for the death of an individual, and cannot libel.

Other than those restrictions we’re free to say anything we please, and cannot be prosecuted for it.

I think, in my opinion, his sort of reaction is quite damaging to the idea of intergration. By targetting a group and making them out to be outsiders, does this push people into the fringes of society, and therefore put people straight into the hands of extremists? IMO, yes. When we make people feel like they don’t belong, due to our NEED to find some form of acceptance we’ll find a group who will (at least pretend) to be on your side. If an extremist group does this…well, it’s self explanitory from there.

There’s plenty of hard evidence to support that opinion of yours – what you believe happens is what actually does happen. The more you penalise a sub-group for the actions of a terrorist minority within that group, the larger that terrorist minority grows.

in my opinion, UK laws on free speech are far sensible than US. Perhaps it has some thing to with lessons learned in WW2 i.e. a political minority gaining power by targeting a religious minority.

Or may be im just anglophile so has a positive bias for anything british.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Man arrested for thought crime in UK

Originally posted by mysticvortex13:
Originally posted by thepunisher52:

@mysticvortex13
Quiy trolling bro

[snip]

Take it easy, don’t try this hard, you are being over.
It’s an online forum, keep it like that.
I have one rule about online forums, no matter how much yoou debate, no matter how much proof you bring to back up your claim, you can not change any one’s opinion.
Pro gun will be pro gun, Pro israel will be pro Israel and the Vagiterians will keep yelling MEAT IS MURDER!

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Man arrested for thought crime in UK

@mysticvortex13
Quiy trolling bro

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Man arrested for thought crime in UK

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:

lol you don’t know wtf you;re talking about, on this or any subject you’ve brought up. Don’t condescend to me you little punk.

Seriously Janto why are you stealing my lines. I expected a better reply from you.

Now , to the topic at hand. All jokes and trolling aside.
I have always been a proponent of “Pakistan first.”
When it comes to countries, there is not friendship or brotherhood, only alliances.

While I do Believe that muslims should follow the sharia law, but I will not tolerate if some one tries to bring it by force.
If some ultra “pious” muslim thinks that all infidels deserve to die, i’ll most likely tell him about the time when jews used to live in medina(As for why non muslims are not allowed in Holy cities anymore? that is another topic for which I do have a justification).
I am a muslim, and proudly so, but If I give a preferentail treatement to a muslim just because he is a muslim or if I snub someone just because they are not muslim (even if I hate them, which I don’t atleast not on religious bases), I’ll be going against the quran for it says “Let not the hatred of someone blind you from what is right”.

Peace out Yo!

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Man arrested for thought crime in UK

I guess I should bring out my guy fawkes mask and knives.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / KKK Rally turns violent (Anaheim, CA, USA)

Originally posted by petesahooligan:

Switching gears a little bit, the tension between “America is too politically correct” and “seriously?” is reaching new levels with Trump’s campaign manager being charged with assault for yanking a reporter away from the candidate by her arm. Video shows it happening but is too poor quality for a clear impression. She was left with bruises, but she also inflated her story in the first few tellings of it.

So, that’s interesting.

Another interesting thing in the world of free speech is how the press seems to be finally turning its eye away from the Tumpalump and towards the emerging showdown between Clinton and Sanders. The nature of the DNC’s internal narrative is emerging, and super-delegates are being challenged to represent the voice of their constituents. (Do super-delegates have constituents?)

The definition of Free Speech should have some qualifiers regarding an audience, I think. If you say all kinds of hateful bullshit in the woods by yourself, no problem. If you say that stuff in a crowded theater — or on tv — you’ll get in a heap of trouble. This means that for your 1st Amendment protections to be invoked, first there needs to be something to protect… and that requires an audience.

Does the size of the audience amplify the magnitude of the “crime?” Is hate speech less hateful if it’s told to just one person compared to a hundred?

Bavk to the topic it seems.
In my opinion, everything can be over done (Just Look at comunism, a good theory taken to its extreme)
So, some people take their right to free speech to a utopic level and think that it will protect them from the backlash. What they tend to forget is that it will only protect them from those people who respect this right of theirs, more importantly from the government (assuming that it respects that right as it is written in the cuntsitiution). But if you are being a complete shitlord, you are bound to piss some people off and some of those people might shove their foot up your ass are hese people doing something illegsl? yes, they are, but in my opinion its on the same level as a guy beating another in a bar for talking dhit about his girlfriend or something, and also isn’t technically the drunk assaulter also infringing the right to free speech of the victime of ass beating?
What i’m trying to say is, go ahead, excercise your right to free speech, but be frigging realistic about it.
If you go in a WB church rally only wearing a leather thong and nipple clamps, you’ll be fucked boy, just in the way you don’t like it to be.
Bottom line is, manage your expectations and keep a lot of lube on person.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / KKK Rally turns violent (Anaheim, CA, USA)

Originally posted by vikaTae:

that whooshing sound was the point flying way over that hard head.

It didn’t fly over, my hard head deflected it.
You hat is most fun for me in forums.
When some one makes a sarcastic comment and I just own up to it.
I get rwo responses, either they call me an idiot and try to move on or they get back in the argument with a renewed vigour.
I once kept a useless argument going for nearly an year on another site. It was really funny. Playing the non conformist is always fun.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Trigger Language

I do have some trigger words although i’ll not hulk out on hearing them

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / KKK Rally turns violent (Anaheim, CA, USA)

Perhaps you should find a local to swing the clue-by-four round your head a few times? You guys are good at that, after all.

Baby I’m so hard headed that it’ll break.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Man arrested for thought crime in UK

Any one iterestedin tin foil?
I’m selling a load

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / KKK Rally turns violent (Anaheim, CA, USA)

Originally posted by vikaTae:
Originally posted by thepunisher52:
Originally posted by vikaTae:

No, but you have plenty of other extremist groups.

Yeah that’s right. They just blew a park. 70 dead 300 wounded.

And as you would say, nobody cares about the wounded. They were just acceptable collateral damage in trying to kill the 70 who died. Likewise if you saw one ofthose responsible in a crowd of people and you had an AK, you’d just open fire on them. Anyone who accidentally gets between your target and a bullet, that’s their tough luck. You wouldn’t give a damn how many innocents you killed or injured, so longas you hit your target.

It’s a chief difference between your culture which glorifies violence and glorifies causing violent death in particular, and our cultures, which do not.

Don’t put words in my mouth.
I’m not Jhco

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:
Originally posted by BombCog:

If you want to describe his entire culture based on how he’s trolling a debate forum on a free flash game website, you also have to own up to Vanguarde and Mafefe, and I don’t think you’re prepared to do that.


I pretty much agree with vika. He doesn’t represent ‘Islamic Culture’ or ‘Indian Culture’ but he’s doing a fine job of representing tribalist dipshit culture. Granted, I’m also dialing up the ‘Western Superiority’ thing a notch because that always burns his pants. Yes, there are plenty of dipshits in the West who are just like him. Still, I have friends who are Pakistani, one who went back recently for an arranged marriage, and despite being an amateur mixed martial artist, he was afraid to walk around his parent’s home village for fear of getting knifed or beaten. And it would’ve been worse if he was a she – yes, rape is universal and it happens a lot here too, but the term ‘rape culture’ is a whole ’nother thing there, and it has little to do with the religion and a lot to do with their blood feuds.

Originally posted by vikaTae:

Problem is he’s not trolling. His culture really is like that. Human life’s dirt cheap and they glorify killing and maiming.

Punisher would blow up a schoolhouse full of children if he had the chance, just to get his rocks off. He’d be lauded as a hero by his peers for doing such a violent and glorous deed. That’s how they roll.


EDIT: I probably should clarify that tribal warfare is big over there. They’re a lot like Europe was 400 years ago. The only difference really is that they’re more technologically advanced and capable than we were. But the glorification of blood sport, honurable killing and vigilanteeism is the same.

It’s a cultural thing rather than anything based in their genes. In another few centuries Pakistan should mature itself out of this phase of development. But, in the meantime, the violent thug mentality rules. Punisher’s just like many of his peers in that respect – a product of his culture.

Ifyou guys are Too PC to call my “Mentality” the product of my Reigion then pleasedrop the act. Other wise although you are ignorant, but not that ignorant as I’ve thought, cheers to you.
What ever the case, you guys are Idiots.
Why? because you idiots take this online debate thing way too seriousely than is healthy.
You are the knd of guys who will call police because some one looked at them threatningly.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / KKK Rally turns violent (Anaheim, CA, USA)

Originally posted by BombCog:

Where are you getting your historical record from? They were active far before that conflict, which is why the United States saw arming them more as an efficient short-term solution to their indirect engagements.

They were active, but not against us. They were fighting between themselves in afghanistan

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / KKK Rally turns violent (Anaheim, CA, USA)

Originally posted by vikaTae:

No, but you have plenty of other extremist groups.

Yeah that’s right. They just blew a park. 70 dead 300 wounded.
But we are fighting them. We’ll eliminate them. There was a time I said “Hey let’s talk to them, after all they are our brothers”. But no more, they are scourge of the earth, they deserve no mercy. Words can’t express my hatred for them.
I’d say catch few of them and flay them.
They did not exist until he us afghan war, coincidence?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Men are the inferior sex, here's why

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:

I think you’ve got a superiority complex. All this rant of OH WE ARE SO CIVILIZED

Naw…well, ok, yeah…but more to the point, I like putting you in your place. Your backwards, unwashed, anachronistic place.

OH MY GOD WHAT A ZINGER /Sarcasm>

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / KKK Rally turns violent (Anaheim, CA, USA)

Originally posted by vikaTae:

Well, we can certainly pilot such a program in your country, Punisher. There they don’t really care if civilians get caught in the crossfire.

We don#t have kkk