Recent posts by thepunisher52 on Kongregate

Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Hezbollah: Resistance movement or terrorists?

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:

I’ve never been called that before, and I don’t know why a Lebanese movement would care about an American gaming site.

I’d assume you care for it the same way most zealots ‘care’ for this site, by stumbling across it and immediately realizing that it hasn’t seen enough pro-hezbollah lebanese action!

The anti-Israel movement isn’t some palestinian frankenstein, it’s gone global. I see no reason why lebanon – or whoever claims to speak for lebanon – wouldn’t want to get in on the bandwagon.

I have, at times, contributed something to these threads. At the moment, broad skepticism in the views of arabs – and their sycophants in pakistan – do me quite well, but if you prefer, I hate Johnnybegood’s posts least of all.

If you are too high and mighty for this humble site, don’t bother coming, nobody is forcing your hand.

My complete contempt for you does, though.

YES, if you say something good about the Taliban, you ARE a shill for them. If you pointed out that dealing with the Taliban is probably Afghanistan’s only chance for survival from civil war, I’d agree.

But slobbering all over their collective cock, as you’ve done so repeatedly, is not the answer. I don’t particularly care how violent you are, or what violent actions you’re willing to go to take your goal. Your bluster is quite irrelevant to me, although I do find it enjoyable to read, so by all means keep going, but you have as much depth as Sacha Baron Cohen. When will morons like you learn, that westernizers are not persuaded by garbage? We don’t care how much you threaten, or boast, or whatever. We care what you can bring to the table. If you can’t bring solid facts, then you’re a worthless sycophant for dictators. That’s all.

This Hezbollah shill, for all his faults, is a serious speaker. When he writes, I listen, even if it’s more of the same garbage, because at least it’s palatable garbage, and not the same old ‘attack us and we’ll destroy you’ riff that I’ve long grown tired of. As far as i’m concerned, the Pakistanis can roast. And I don’t much care if they say the same about us. They’ll radiate long before we will, if only because of their own idiotic stubbornness.

So in tour opinion, stating some positive fact about someone, makes you their “shill”?
You, see I think that a positive attitude or an act committed by some one you don’t like, must not be dicounted just because you dislike the person committing the act.
Also, once, I was just like Labayka, then I learned no matter what, You can not change the opinion of most of the people online.
So why bother, its much more fun to just frighten or enrage people than researching hard facts and giving online links and such.
You may have grown tired of this ‘attack us and we’ll destroy you’ but that is the truth.
You mate seem to have a superiority complex, not unlike hipsters. You seem to see the world with a special glass, which shows you every one smaller than they really are.
I still stand by my statement that

Seriously, for many of these westerners, any one talking in contrast to what their media portrays is a goon of the related organisation.

Also you seem to attack the person rather than argument.
What is this talk about Radiation?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Hezbollah: Resistance movement or terrorists?

Originally posted by Jantonaitis:

I realize again why I stopped coming here.

If you are too high and mighty for this humble site, don’t bother coming, nobody is forcing your hand.

Originally posted by Labayka:
Originally posted by Jantonaitis:

Reading this thread from start to finish (and to be fair, I skimmed alot of the posts after page 1), I realize again why I stopped coming here.


Interesting thread topic, but run by an obvious hezbollah shill, so there’s limited space for it to grow into something. Critics are somewhat knowledgeable about the topic (Johnny), but too many stupid analogies to disguise lack of source material. Most don’t know shit and instead rely on generalizations they believe are applicable to many war theatres (winnibago, Neilsenna especially), or technobabble (vika). Oh, and there’s also the pakistani militant shill, I suppose.


It’s no wonder that when I left, people were saying that Crow was the most insightful poster in SD. He’s certainly the only one whose posts I finished all the way.


I’ve never been called that before, and I don’t know why a Lebanese movement would care about an American gaming site.
Seriously, why would Hezbollah care about a gaming site in a country where it has no presence and is considered a terrorist organisation?
If you want to contribute something to the thread, I would be grateful. If not, it means that no one on Kong can prove that HE lost in 2006.
EDIT: Just read the first post and it does look a bit “shilly”. Blame it on my inexperience.

Seriously, for many of these westerners, any one talking in contrast to what their media portrays is a goon of the related organisation.
I mean if say something good about Taliban or any of the freedom fighters who had been fighting in Kashmir, I’m a “Pakistani militant shill” but those who intentionally target civilians just because they are not of same ethinicity or those who want revive naziism
are Revolutionaries and freedom fighters and those who take over land illegaly and then commit acts of violence against natives are “innocent civilians”.

 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Ask an Atheist (AAA)

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Hell

And I was thinking to myself,
“This could be Heaven or this could be Hell”
Then she lit up a candle and she showed me the way
There were voices down the corridor,
I thought I heard them say…

Welcome to the Hotel California
Such a lovely place (Such a lovely place)
Such a lovely face
Plenty of room at the Hotel California
Any time of year (Any time of year)
You can find it here

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / 7even Deadly Sins

Originally posted by Twilight_Ninja:
Originally posted by dd790:

Wrath – Being angry just gives me a headache and I was brought up well so use words rather than fists so that’s out
Greed – Too much of a soft touch to be greedy, would feel like a twat taking more than my share
Sloth – Idleness bores me
Pride – Love watching people who think they are better than themselves look like tools, couldn’t do with being one of them
Envy – Never seen the point in jealousy
Gluttony – Can’t eat a full Mars bar without feeling sick let alone be a glutton
Lust – Probably the nearest but I’d still say no, I have a huge sex drive, very flirty and think NSA is the best acronym ever. However, I don’t join in with the lads when out and seeing a girl where they do that typical “whoa she’s nice, wouldn’t mind a go on that, look at those tits/arse etc” stuff, I just find it all very distasteful. I don’t tend to look at strangers sexually at all, obviously I can see a girl is my view of pretty, but I don’t lust after women. Passion yes, lust no.

So I’m just curious….how (strongly) would we define wrath here? For instance, if someone gets fired by an employer and they feel it is unjust, is releasing stress by blogging about it wrath?

Or would we only start to consider it “wrath” if they slashed their employer’s tires or planned a shooting spree?

You want a defination of Wrath/
You don’t know what WRATH IS!
You FUCKING DON’T KNOW WHAT WRATH IS?
IN WHAT KIND OF REDNECK HOUSEHOLD WERE YOU BROUGHT UP?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH, YOUR STUPIDITY IS KILLING ME, GET LOST FROM MY SIGHT OR I’LL DO SOMETHING."
I think I just made my point clear

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / 7even Deadly Sins

Originally posted by vikaTae:
Originally posted by thepunisher52:
So you are the perfect embodiment of a woman scorned.

I have severe anger tendencies, yes. it’s not on the hairpin trigger it was during my teen years, but it is still there. I suppose if we’re talking non-traditional sins loyalty is a big one for me, that ties directly into wrath. Within reason if you hurt me, that’s fine. If you hurt those I love, you’re in for a world of hurt. Again, I’m not big on physical punishment; I’m physically weak and that’s not likely to change any time soon. But my mind is keen, and there are all sorts of ways to extract revenge if you know where to look.

But as I say to get me really angry, you have to work at it. There are a few things such as physical sexual assault of a friend, that will get you on the shit-list instantly, where you will stay for the rest of your miserable life. Physical sexual assault of me, is the one thing still likely to end that life there and then, probably along with my own. That’s an absolute no-no. Not again. Never again, and my wrath comes out full force if that even looks remotely likely.

Usually when someone gets on the shit-list it’s through abuse of those I care about, rather than abuse of me. One of the advantages of not having a 100% organic body, is you’re used to pain, and your threshold gets quite high. So I can deal with that. What I cannot deal with is when you’re hurting those I love. Stealing from them, exploiting them, physical trauma against them or against their kids. Depending on how long you’ve been doing it, or what you’ve been doing, you are setting yourself up for a very, very miserable life.

So your revenge will comprise years of suffering eh?
As for me, when somebody pisses me off, I just get a sort of wave of anger, kind of a heat wave, if I don’t do anything in that (which I usually don’t) no one gets hurt physically. After that, if offence is serious, I will look for the ways that hurt them, with in some boundaries and rules of course, not something cheap or unmanly.
\What do you mean that you do not have a 100% organic body?

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / 7even Deadly Sins

Originally posted by karmakoolkid:
Originally posted by Kasic:

I think it’s important to take into consideration the degree. A lot of them can even be good in moderation.

Oh, absolutely…degrees.
And, as ya point out, even though we are (supposedly?) talking about SIN—whatever the hell (< intended referential pun) that is…very subjective—here for the topic of the thread; if one takes a more objective look at these areas of human behavior, we will see that the bell-curve can be applied.

One can either applied it to each side of the coin…good & bad.
Or, they can combine the two…with one at opposing ends of the bell.
This enables us to view Kasic’s point about how some of this behavior can actually be of benefit.


But, in addition to—or simply an overlaying aspect of that paradigm which brings a strong aroma of subjectivity—degrees is the concept of assessment of the actual behavior that can give some reasonable/rational description of each “level” of the behaviors in consideration.


Plus, while I’m not enough of a theologian to speak significantly on this, there is the whole factor about just how bad can a “sin” be if it is easily absolved (absolution?) by doing some very simple tasks (6 Holy Marys, etc.). I mean, if one isn’t held accountable in any serious measure for their “sins”….then let’s just call them mistakes and muddle onward in life.


Of note, it is my belief that such concepts of 7 deadly sins, 10 commandments, etc. are nothing more than something tangible, able to address the more ethereal nature of spirituality, used by a particular kind of “leadership” (religious?) on the lesser-intellectuals in an effort to manage them.


OH, I probably should muddy up the waters by bringing in: sins of omission and of commission.
Plus, would one be capable of gluttony were they to not be starving to death because they live in horrid conditions?


Holy Crap Karma, your answers are as straight as a corkscrew.
Wrath: I’m a wrathful being, no doubt about that. It usually takes a good while or a concerted effort on the other party’s part to get on to my ‘smite thee’ list, but once you are on … you never come off. I don’t trust easily, and as a direct counterpart, I forgive very rarely.

Wrath for me, almost never takes the form of a direct confrontation. If it does, it be verbal rather than physical. But that is usually part of a larger effort to seek revenge, using every trick and technique I know, as well as my awareness of systems and how they interconnect. Doesn’t have to be me you hurt either. Hurting my friends is actually rather worse than hurting me, and if you assault them, or assault their kids, well hell hath no fury… and it tends to come wrapped in my form.


So you are the perfect embodiment of a woman scorned.
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / 7even Deadly Sins

Originally posted by Kasic:

I think it’s important to take into consideration the degree. At what point does anger become wrath? When does self interest turn into greed? Is it being lazy if you don’t always give all of your effort into every task? Is pride arrogance, or is it as simple as being more than comfortable with a position or belief? Is lust experiencing any sort of sexual desire, or is it only when it is obsessive/uncontrollable? Are you envious to want to have something you don’t have? Is gluttony overindulgence or anything greater than the minimum required?

Under my definition of each term (the extremes) the only one that really fits me is sloth. I put minimal effort into pretty much everything because I am capable of accomplishing tasks without trouble. There’s never been anything that challenged me (except Calculus 1 because my teacher did not teach the material). For example, I had three months to write my macroeconomics paper. It is due tomorrow. I finished it an hour ago and spent ~3 hours total. I’m confident I will get an A, but on terms of how much I tried, it’s on the order of 3-5% of what I could have accomplished if I wanted to do my best. In fact, I had an issue getting Word to numerate the pages correctly and I really didn’t care, so every page past the second is numbered as 2. Meh.

Maybe gluttony too, if you count eating a large brownie during that time. Speaking of which I’m going to get more right now :)

I’m not fond of the idea of these being sins. All of them are natural human tendencies. While some are obviously harmful or bad when taken too far, there’s nothing wrong about being angry, wanting more, relaxing, being proud of your accomplishments, having a libido, experiencing a desire to have something you do not, or consuming things you don’t need to survive. A lot of them can even be good in moderation.

Dude, you are not lazy, you are just extremely efficient just like, I have never exerted my self on anything my whole life, I mean when I was studying, it was a few days to each subject and I would score 70+ marks.
As for my Sins, Wrath and Gluttony would be mine.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / 7even Deadly Sins

According to wikipedia,
“The seven deadly sins, also known as the capital vices or cardinal sins, is a classification of vices (part of Christian ethics) that has been used since early Christian times to educate and instruct Christians concerning fallen humanity’s tendency to sin. In the currently recognized version, the sins are usually given as wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and gluttony.”
So by this definition 7 deadly sins are:
* Wrath
* Greed
* Sloth
* Pride
* Lust
* Envy
* Gluttony
So what is/are your deadly sin(s)?

 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Thematic relations critique?

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Thematic relations critique?

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Thematic relations critique?

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 

Topic: Serious Discussion / Thematic relations critique?

This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Thematic relations critique?

Originally posted by Aeuctonomy:

A thematic relation is a how a noun phrase functions with respect to the meaning of the action described by the verb. It seems to me like most of these relationships contradict each other, and are too in-specific to efficiently quantify a thematic relationship.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thematic_relation#See_also
Agents are also be experiencers, and both can be patients.
Theme can always change, and also not.
Agents can also be instruments.
ect…
These could be qualified under
Quantity
Method
Quality
Intentions/disintentions
Conclusion, inconclusion
Recipient, non-recipient
Opinions anyone?

Damn you, I though you were talking about some new weapon.
(at first glance, I read Thematic as Thermobaric)

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / 600

Originally posted by Helltank:

First of all, do not address me as “heel tank”.

Second of all, thepunisher52 has misunderstood my point. I was questioning the “would put down with extreme prejudice too” part.

If I remember correctly, SAS was very active during the troubles.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / 600

Originally posted by vikaTae:BLA BLA BLA

These links were in answer to heel tank asking for links, as he said I shoul not call them terrorists with out.
As for you, Vika, last time I checked, it as not us in Iraq or afghanista, or Ukrain for that matter, or slowly strangling life out of palestinians as the bastion of western civilisation in Middle east, neither are we alone in having sepratist movements europe has its too (as I pointed out earlier).

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / 600

Originally posted by Helltank:

Hitler and Stalin being decent painters is not evidence of their positive contribution to society because painting has nothing to do with that. But actively contributing to the study of neuroscience DOES have something to do with it.

These are the terrorists which your gov. would put down with extreme prejudice too

Read the thread on crystal meth, specifically the last few posts. In case you don’t want to, let me repeat what I said there.
DO NOT MAKE ASSERTIONS WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE

Evidently, they are separatists… necessary conditions to express a reliable opinion

Nobody wants them to give a reliable opinion. We do want them to stop being murdered by you guys. And bias has nothing to do with outright murder.

You want Evidence, Here you go
http://www.examiner.com/article/premier-hrcp-slams-killing-of-13-punjabi-laborers-by-london-based-bla

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Quaid-e-Azam_Residency_attack

http://defence.pk/threads/bla-kills-14-punjabi-workers-after-id-check.269404/
http://tribune.com.pk/story/563531/one-official-killed-in-attack-on-quaid-e-azam-residency-in-balochistan/

Hitler and Stalin being decent painters is not evidence of their positive contribution to society because painting has nothing to do with that. But actively contributing to the study of neuroscience DOES have something to do with it.

What I am saying is, you still can be a cunt in personal life while being good perfessionaly.

No it does not means that she is not xenophobic which she had demonstrated on many occasions, also she seems very easy to be scared.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / 600

How about the 3 million murdered by Pakistan and its supporters in Bangladesh during its war of independence? Or the upwards of 200,000 Bangladeshi women raped when rape was being used as an instrument of terror?

As she said, this is all in the past.

Or the terrorising and murders being carried out in Balochistan?

These are the terrorists which your gov. would put down with extreme prejudice too, just like “the troubles”.
Oh, and the first lines of their About us page are,

Things have started to become difficult for the Baloch since their country Balochistan was attacked and divided by the British imperial forces in 1839 – subsequently later occupied by Iran and Pakistan in 1928 and 1948 respectively.

Evidently, they are separatists, I would Hardly call them unbiased or impartial, necessary conditions to express a reliable opinion.
Or the disgusting way that Pakistani women are treated by their men? Anyone who doesn’t know about that can find out what lovely people some Pakistanis are here.

The key word here is Some, I’m sure there are some people every where who mistreat women.
Oh and Separatism is not exclusive to us

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / 600

Originally posted by vikaTae:

What made me smile is how he compares himself to an American psychopath as part of his defense. It’s certainly a defense against your own defense lawyer being willing to call you to the witness stand, but I’m not sure how helpful it is to his case beyond that.

Now you are just splitting hair.

Let’s talk about this theory of your’ s that baton has been passed to us. Give an example.

who I understand is scientifically educated and has actively contributed to the study of neuroscience

Hitler and stalin were very decent painters.
Being good in one thing does not mean being good in everything and vice versa.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / Hezbollah: Resistance movement or terrorists?

A wise man Said, “Guerrilla Wins by not Losing and an army loses by not wining.”
IDF in this could not achieve its objectives and as it may have dealt more losses to enemy, but it failed its mission, hence the war, if body count is the indication of victory, Japanese and Germans won WWII Spectacularly.
As for causalities, they are Israel’s weakness. In last Gaza incursion, when did their rhetoric change? right after a suicide blast in a bus. Before that, they were being all high and mighty.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / 600

Originally posted by vikaTae:
Originally posted by Winnabago:

Are you saying that punisher’s people believe death and violence to be goods in and of themselves?

Considering how Punisher constantly posts the most violent solution to any issue, asks people how they would like to die, celebrates the deaths of others on this forum (he’s done that several times) and referred to a problem he had locally with some young boys, whose fathers told him to go and drown their sons in the river if they bothered him again, then yes I would say his people believe violent death to be an end in itself, and violence in general to be the ends that justifies the means.

Oh,“the Baton has passed” Its you guys stuck in Afghanistan, meddled in Iraq and Libya, and now it is you guys who want to go in Ukraine. “The Baton has passed”
If you were not a lady, I would have told you to shove that baton up your ass.
Forming an opinion about my people based on me, is Like I forming an opinion about
Americans after watching American psycho or on brits after watching A clock work orange

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / 600

This part always makes me wonder,
How can one be so lacking in sense of self preservation to charge at the enemy head first?
What were those people and how the hell humanity survived that period.
The period when term “Cannon fodder” came to existence.

Originally posted by vikaTae:

Meh, senseless violence is more your people’s speciality Punisher. We’ll leave it to you.

Let me see, Hundered years war
War of Roses
English Civil war
War of Scottish Independence.
Irish Rebellion
The Troubles.
Falkland War
World War
World war 2
Vietnam War
Anglo French Wars
Anglo Spanish Wars
Nepoleanic Wars
30 years war.
Zulu Wars.
Afghan War(s)
War of independence 1857.
and the list goes on.

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / 600

Well if you do it again I hope we get another kickass song like the trooper

 
Flag Post

Topic: Serious Discussion / 600

Theirs not to make reply,
Theirs not to reason why,
Theirs but to do and die:

 
Flag Post

Topic: Off-topic / OFFICIAL 1 word to describe the user above.

CUNT