mat3301
6 posts
|
Topic: Senatry /
Equipment "Activity"
Equipment “Activity”
http://176.9.72.81/reportBugs/screenCapture/135806/955424/74507.jpg
http://176.9.72.81/reportBugs/screenCapture/135806/959959/04508.jpg
http://176.9.72.81/reportBugs/screenCapture/135806/966404/64509.jpg
Are you making fun of us with this attempt to provoke active advanced armor/weapons acquisition? To get some better gear isn’t the problem. The problem is to get enough Silver to upgrade all this new stuff. Looks like I’ll have to hunt for some bad stuff (for bugle, from NP) to sell it for silver. And it doesn’t look an efficient strategy, I say… Now, why green&blue gear doesn’ sells for much more Silver, ’en the white one??
|
mat3301
6 posts
|
|
mat3301
6 posts
|
Topic: Senatry /
Suggestion Thread
1. We have more “Heroes” (Hero cap), than we have right to field (array capacity?), usually. Moreover, we don’t have the best sets of armor&weapons for every Hero. And exchange these armor&weapons between Heroes is the real pain in the…
We do need some simple way to exchange these armor&weapons between a couple of Heroes, that may be exchanged by the rules (Hero levels).
2. The second one is for the next game version.
Some seven years of the Legion Arena release, its engine may, finally, be ported to browser. It’s the best battle system in the terms of beauty/computation demands factor (price/performance) ever. Yea, Total War may be ways better, but you really don’t won’t to try to port that one to flash in the next five years, at least ;)
If even Legion Arena engine is too “heavy” (demanding), there was Warhammer Dark Omen… for these, old enough to remember :) And even Centurion engine would be better, then what we use now (for the matter, even Fantasy General’s would be)… Nowadays it should be possible to run Centurion on calculator ;)
|
mat3301
6 posts
|
|