Husk

I don't really understand why everyone here is rating this game badly. does it really have to have a "point" to be good? other than that, people seem to be downrating it because..well...to be honest, I can't really figure out the reason, just saying it's bad without reason doesn't help the developer improve. personally, I thought this was actually a pretty good game, but the physics were slightly off and there should be some easier way to combine the elements without going from one box in one room to another on some other end of the map. 3/5

Whenever I look at the ratings of games like this one I'm getting the idea that most of the users of Kongregate are little kids without any ability whatsoever to enjoy experimental games that require a bit of imagination. It's rather sad, really. You are missing out on some of the best games.

This was a very interesting experimental game. The floaty physics is a big problem--very distracting from the gameplay. The lack of any sort of story or ending is also an issue...but, apart from those two things, this was actually pretty good. Especially liked the fact you had to experiment with the rods and figure out what they did. I was puzzled that it didn't seem like having no power had any effect. All in all, lots of potential, needs some tightening up to become a great little game.

husk means remember in norwegian :)

A rating of 2.72? But this is good stuff! If you can't appreciate original gameplay, GET BACK AT YOUR RPG OR TD OR WHATEVER TEDIOUS GAME YOU'RE INTO AND DON'T RATE.