登入即可保存進度並獲得點數!
RePixel

RePixel

由 PipkinGames

Loading ad...

RePixel

評分:
3.3
上架時間: February 05, 2016
最後更新: February 05, 2016
開發者: PipkinGames

RePixel 的標籤

遊戲介紹

Guess the hidden image, repixelating it. Try to repixel as less as possible to get best result!

遊玩說明

Click the image to repixelate part of it. Press mouse button and move to repixelate more and faster.

留言

0/1000
multifails avatar

multifails

Jan. 26, 2016

185
7

The idea is very nice, however the game should go further with de-blurring instead of a huuuuge jump to clear picture after 4 clicks - the pixels clicked 3 times are too blurry to be helpful in any way and the next step is ridicilously clear. Perhaps make it so that the pixels wont get smaller after the 4th click, but just less blurry (1 or 2 extra steps in between) and the cost of clicking them open should be exponential instead of linear to discourage just opening a small area completely and hoping you hit an area that has very good hits of what the picture is about.

petesahooligan avatar

petesahooligan

Jan. 27, 2016

115
6

I protest one of the pictures. I incorrectly chose "well" because the picture featured an "oil well." (The correct answer, apparently, was oil... even though there was no oil in the picture.)

achesler avatar

achesler

Jan. 28, 2016

103
7

If you are going to make Mushroom Houses with little doors and windows, and I select House, don't tell me its a Mushroom.

gryphon70 avatar

gryphon70

Jan. 28, 2016

75
5

It's a nice, quick , amusing game. A good time passer without taxing your mind much. Sometimes I just want to play a game for 5-10 minutes and finish it but I still want some challenge or interest. I think this is an original idea and that carries some merit in and of itself. I scored horribly when I played but I enjoyed it. I find that a game like this lends itself to the appreciation of the the art and not getting the best score.

Muskar avatar

Muskar

Jan. 30, 2016

56
7

Impossible with 0 pixels? I don't think it is. You could learn what the image of all motives looked like or just get extremely lucky. With that said, I think these quick 0's are most likely cheaters, nonetheless.