Under rating threshold (hideshow)
good god, three whole days and still no badges? how completely reasonable!
guys if it is in the "Newest Games" area, it is likely to be a new game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
nice an awesome a great game i think its better than the first.but no achevments yet!!!kong save this game from a 4/5!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Personally, I think deploying less troops to win a battle should be a GOOD thing. Tactical reason: It shows you can use troops more effectively than the enemy. Practical/realistic reason: You are risking the lives of less troops, but you still win the battle.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
actually i put it on normal and i couldnt beat it and everyone in my family that tried it couldnt beat it because 5 t6anks come at once
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
nickel950: so since u suck at this game it must be bad? cant u just except that just becuz ur not good at it doesnt make it a bad game?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
and is honestly the worst game i have ever played and the maker should stop makeing because he sucks at makeing games
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
If you're slightly lucky, you can easily kill a tank with an assault by throwing 5 nades @ 40$ each (w/ upgrade)
anyways, try to get that upgrade first, you'll have bazookas coming out at 320$ every 12s or so
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Expansion too short. Needs more campaign levels, that way you could unlock more stuff. I got through the game in about 10 minutes and didn't get many unlocks because I didn't spend a ton of time shooting it out. Liked the other artillery calling system better, but it does make commanders more useful.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
1/5. The level with the first tank is nearly impossible since the bazooka guys take so damn long to load. And you only get ***ing one. >:\
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
1/5. This is a bad game, considering the imbalance, and reason it was made. I get tired of all these "come to our site so you can actually play the game" games. I could live with that 4/5- but insult to injury- strategy. I like the old one better in a few ways... Like how your enemies can have SEVERAL groups in one cover and you can only have 1 as TommyDB said. This often leads to REALLY unrealistic flanking.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
deathreaper30
Shermans had one advantage over the Panzer, which is generally considered the reason we won the war: It was easy to make. Almost all WWII German Weapons were difficult, expensive, and time consuming to make.
But great game. Glad to see it here finally.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Bazookas need to be way better versus tanks. At least make them cost less and come out faster. Or have 2 Riflemen and 2 bazookas and make them cost a little more.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
my only problem is that somehow the sherman somehow beats my panzer in a a fight yet the panzer is better in every way
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
you wouldnt have to destroy 3 or 4 tanks if you were good enough to flank them and win by the time their 2nd tank rolls off... which u can pwn with mortar