Under rating threshold (hideshow)
good game, 5/5, and favorited, i think they should put in a different era, not modern day though, theres a complete lack of melee weapons today, theres close range, but no melee. i think an era where people had more to fight about would be nice, like cavemen times, except with swords and whatnaught
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Beautiful game! The gameplay is great, the mini-game style of combat was fun, and it was fun to master. Really enjoyed it. Would have loved to see more than the 3 levels though. Still I give it 5/5. I rarely see this quality in a flash game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i saw many people propose different themes here..how about Alexander the great, and the battles against the Persians, those were epic...also 3 major battles.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Hard is in every way too hard, o lost too much morale with much more velocity, and you cant make brutal taunts...fight is too rapid...
but Normal and Easy its ok.
=)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
some time earlier i left a bad comment about this game...i apologize for that...this is definitely one of the best games ive played on this site. 5/5
cheers.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the story is correct, and i like that. to supply: the Normans were descendants of an earlier viking huscarl who got exciled, and the vikings did exist in sweden and denmark as well - but it was the norwegean ones who took England. for instance, the town York was actually named Jorvik by the vikings. and the king's name was Harald Hardråde, but i'm sure you couldn't get that in English.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Great game i would love to see this idea continued through other battles, i loved the unit/point system, i would complain that it was short but that is not the fault of the creators, the battle of hastings was only so long
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
FIGHT THE WAR :D They made a game about the battle of hastings, i'm from hastings damn this is awesome so favourited lol
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
3 battles might seem short but, because of the graphic, the multiplayer option, and the "build your own battle" feature I think is more than enough. The thinking behind the game is excelent. 5/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
COOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The multiplayer almost always collapses to me!!!
It's my computer, or it happens to someone else?
Please, rate + this coment if you think the game needs a much better multiplayer, whith rankings, chat...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
For all those people complaining about there are only 3 levels... well, in fact in 1066 there were only 3 important battles in England, so...
Yes, the game could be better, improving the multiplayer, or making a second part in another period of history, but i give 5/5.
Please, improve multiplayer!
:)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ok .. wait .. that was it?! 3 battles? .. holy ... no .... i mean .. story is the most easy work ... you could just even copy the levels three times .. what the heck^^ shit shit shit... almost 5/5 .. its killing too much ressources -> 4/5 ... for the shortness .. almost 3/5 ... damnit .. it has a multiplayer .. hard vote .. somewhere between 3 and 4/5 .. ill give it a 4 .. it was fun.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is the best strategic game i ever played on kong.
Not only a great game, with perfect historical accuracy, but the only that makes you to fight the battles in the way they were fougth. (i.e charging and retreating with cavalry in the hastings battle, and much more)
I give 5/5.
It needs badges, and a much better multiplayer, with rankings and chat.
And, a lot of times the multiplayer shuts down.
Anyway, i loved it!