Under rating threshold (hideshow)
is there anyone who didn't just have their king, two of his elite units and the rest archers for EVERYTHING? the archers are the most op unit when there's lost of them...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
this game is good but it would be cool if u added more maps in online instead of inviting ur friend who sometimes wont play
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is great, on easy and normal. On hard mode they have an unfair advantage, if you disagree you're wrong. If you do a perfect fight you lose more than them, even if there are no formations involved. Have to fix that. But It's a good game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
dear channelfour developers, i love your game and would love to see and play a similar one with more missions and verieties of troops keep up the good work!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You should make an 1864, Civil War era, with cannons instead of archers. That way you could have more than 3 battles xD
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Very, very well designed. You NEED to be able to think strategically, (not tactically), to win.
My one complaint is with the controls because sometimes they are clunky when trying to choose units to attack.
5/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
great game great gameplay and from a historical point of view its 100% accurate love it and i still play it add me so we can play against each other
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
there seems to be a bug in the multiplayer: when the unit which gets moved by the other player kills the unit which you had chosen to attack first the game freezes. animation and music still work but the units stop moving.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think the combat is too choppy. it would be a lot easier if the keys moved smoothly instead of jumping from dot to dot.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
For the Multiplayer: pls make the "king"-units weaker, i understand that they have in the campaign an important (historic) role, but in the PvP it doesnt make any sense to me how it is fair when i lose a battle, in which 4 (2 nearly full hp) of my units fight against 2 hostile (from which one of them is retreating), only because the king is nearly indestructible and has ridiculous high damage.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
for those of you who dont know, 1066 was the year that william, duke of normandy invaded england. The english in this game actually would represent the saxons, who lost and the normans won. this lead to a french ruller controlling england and thus the start of a beautifull powerstruggle for who controlled the thrones of england and france. The englash ended up controlling normandy for a while but they lost that in a campain in france.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I just defeated the Normans (playing as the Vikings) on Hard. These are the pertinent stats: Vikings Dead: 2142, Normans Dead: 1567; Vikings Fled: 239, Normans Fled: 3617. Thank you for a strategy game that involves actual strategy!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
dear developers: please make a sequel, this isone of thebest games i have EVER played on kongregate. the turn based strategy is awesomeness...good job!