Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I agree with Chaor, I'm forgetting my history though, I know at about 1300 the Scottish rebelled, but were they under the rule of England in 1066? If so, maybe Scotland would have been cool. (Yes, because Scotland pwns.) Maybe you could make another one, like "1300" about the English, or like "1500" about the European explorers going to America. Just an idea. Good game, too. 4/5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Klamp, thats an excellent strategy. Morale wins are the easiest. Keep your king protected, indeed avoid fighting with it. By taking an enemy king, expect AT LEAST 25 in morale damage. After that, the enemy flee like you wouldnt believe
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Alright, once you figure it out, taunting is less dangerous, but morale still needs to be fixed.
Also, archers need a lot of work. It's hard until after the first battle to understand how to use archers well, and even then shots that appear to be perfect end up "ok" or "poor," and some that look wild get you a "good" shot.
4/5 to not bring it down. Needs work, but I love the idea and it's implemented well enough for a first try. Another would be great! If another one is made, there should be more maps available. A new setting would also be fun.
One last point: I would prefer to be able to attack vertically in melee, but I don't think that should be changed if you really like it in its current setup.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game needs badges. This game cant have spartans because the Roman empire would have conquered the Greek empire by 1066. In fact, I think by 1066 the roman empire was dusted too, so if both facts i said are correct, having spartans in this game wouldn't be senceable.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Taunting BLOWS. In the first battle, I was up by over 1200 men. I sent my king to battle one of the earls. My king died, but the earl ran away in fear. Even though my morale was about 60 and my enemy's 39, my morale dropped so low from a king dying to WIN a fight that my most crucial Varyags ran away, and I ended up losing the battle to about 300 Englishmen calling me names. I was about to come and say what an amazing game this was until that happened. I'm going to give the battle one more try before I quit this game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game needs badges, I'd say it's good enough. One of the better games on kong, atleast in terms of strategy =D. 5/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i would like a roman version about their expansion but with a VERY long campaing with at least 3 sides:rome,carthage and the huns
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
noticed a glitch. In the Battle of Stamford when the enemy units get to the place where they cannot go forward they remain there no matter what
and the stronger units never advance too.
good for the player atleast. XD
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
nice game but way too short than i expected.
and master rahl if u know how to play artillery type of games the archer part should be easy.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I f&*$#$(** hate the archery mini game, but I like the rest of it. I don't know how, but I always manage to kill mostly my own troops. I'm about to give up on having archers at all.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Great game. I like how it teaches history too. Could get the seventh-graders in my teacher aid period not fail history.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
So awesome, the hard mode is a great challenge, and the game can be adjusted for any skill level. Hope to see badges coming, everyone rate 5 star!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
wow. Suprisingly really great great game. Totally needs badges. Maybe a bit more variety to the minigames... but really great. Would love to see a sequal or an extended campaign.