Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Me:WE HAVE THE UPPER HAND, WE CAN WIN THIS WA-wait, where are you guys going?
Soldier:WE'RE RETREATING!
Me:wait, what? I never ordered a retreat!
Soldier:You didn't have to, the morale is low.
Me:wait, But how? We're winning, we killed most of the archers and thier leader ran away, what could possibly be making us retreat now?
Soldier:It's...it's...
Me:What?
Soldier:One of the archers...He called us all turds...
Me:...SHUT....DOWN...EVERYTHING...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I got a question…In 1066, I played as the normans and when I was choosing my troops it said the knights had like 5(attack) & 3(defense). When I started the battle, it said they had 3&3 for stats. same for the men-at-arms. Doesn’t really bother me, but why is that?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
is it normal for someone to be stuck on the firing phase for archers, and force the opponet to surrender? Cause my troops moved out of his archer range, and he's just been standing there in "Enemey is preparing to fire" phase for like 5 minutes...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I've always said I liked outnumbered battles...but this game has helped me actually be good at them. For a challenge, try only deploying 15 or 20 points of units.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
this game is pretty cool but needs more missions. a sequel would be awesome u HEAR THAT CHANNEL FOUR!! WE WANT A SEQUEL!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i want sequel so bad..... ive now resorted to creaming my friends and the hard ai. P.S Wiliams troops are the best =D
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
PICTURE THIS 60 SPEARMEN CHARGING AT 50 ARCHERS WHO WINS? YOU DEVIDE 1=HORSES 2= ARCHERS ILL TELL YOU THE RESULTS K^_^
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
An excellent example of what a little imagination can do. It makes battle interesting, and makes it fun to play over and over again, each with different forces! I LOVE IT!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The only problems with this game is that the campaign is only 3 battles long and only has 3 nations and maybe make more maps but besides that awsome game. They should make another.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the taunting doesnt really make sense. i was a knight charging at a archer...he told me i was an onion eyed oaf and i ran off...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Sweet game, Its fun to challenge yourself with the fewest soliders you can and still win. Vikings seem to be my favorite though.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I wonder why Kongregate hasn't highlighted this game more? It is well though out and great gameplay, such a good idea to be able to play against real opponents when you feel like it. Seriously deserves a look from greg and definitely some badges. 5 out of 5 from me, thanks for a great game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I don't know who you are, but I respect your skill with archers. If you read this, your one of the few people who play this that challenge me, and I'm sure you think the same. You had all archers except for 1 warrior, we were both vikings, and I had warriors and 2 special units (forgot the name of). Please add me if you read this man. :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This IS the best game on kong,im actually surprised that it hasnt got badges.
please make a new game in another era, either american war of indipendance with cannons and guns or a roman campaign with similar weapons.Everyone plz vote 5/5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
next game like this should either be world war 1/peloponesian war(sparta vs athena,google it) or the holy wars/crusaders.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
We were learning about the dark ages, when this happened, and I knew the answers because of this game. And that's how games are educational.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The morale thing can be really unrealistic you aren't going to surrender to one sword unit when you have five that's just ridiculous that they would surrender