Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is one of those rare games that occupy your mind greatly for a very long time, for every battle is a challenge and though yes, it is short, the battles are relatively long. This game... it's diamond on top of the coal pile of flash games, along with a few with, as far as I'm concerned. 5/5 stars, thank you for making this game! it's awesome!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Just for fun I fought with an all (but 1) archer army in a custom scenario. Worked out pretty well - killed 5k of their troops, and only lost 900. The bridge map let me line up 4 archers in each line cut most of them down before they got to my duke/infranty troop that blocked the bridge.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It's lies!! I try on the hard difficulty, it's Vikings vs. Normans. I fight off their calvary and their men-at-arms, it's about one thousand of their archers against about five hundred of my Varangian Guards and Harold Hadrada. Long story short the enemy taunts me, and everyone surrenders... :P
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I agree with Pedrolafalc, I wish that we could attack from all sides, and I also think that the moral system isn't quite right. BUT, I still love the game and I give 5/5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Waterloo seems too far down the line, by the 1800s all the weapons and armies were completely different. A closer period would be the hundred years war in the 1300-1400s, where they were still using knights and archers.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game was essentially a tie-in to a British series, oddly enough broadcast on Channel Four. As such a sequel is unlikely, but still... Waterloo would be pretty badass.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Really great game, I enjoyed it a lot. But one of the main problems for me, regardless game length, is that you can't fire arrows to your left or your right, or attack a unit from all sides, only front or back. This ruins some strategy skills I wanted to use...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Before you guys get all angry, try to use your brain a bit more. I said a sequel, I did not specifically say 1066 version 2.0, and others have already suggested using this game system for other historical wars such as Romans, Egyptians, Persians, Alexander the Great etc. It would actually be a better idea to base the sequel on a different era, since the 1066 campaign is going to be this short no matter what, and several ppl have complained it was too short. I am only giving suggestions to try and improve an already good game system, rather than you guys who just criticize others without giving any constructive input.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
My only complaint would be on the moral ssystem, I've had 6 healthy armies to one damaged enemy army, but i lost due to morale. A little moediversity in the units would not hurt either
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Yo, whaddabout tannenberg, or hattin? small battles, no campaign, but still battles. Maybe a collection of those types of battles?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i don't need a badge to know how i'm a good player.this game have a own challenge,is unique in his genre.is short,but the norman campaign in england in that year was really short.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is a great game but every now and then my units act like they're not fighting when they're getting @%#$ing killed!
Oooops sorry I hate bugs anywho very addicting and good game 5/5 but if you want really addicting games check out addictinggames.com (I'm getting paid to say this. I'm not kidding.)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is great
Superb Graphics and as for the taunts
Cowards in a French Accent is great
We dont need no Badges
Play games for the effort and time someone has put in to making it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Synegg Do you have any respect for history? They didn't have siege weapons or phalanx formation. Have some respect for history
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
GODDAMMIT WHY IS EVERYONE SAYING THEY SHOULD ADD UNITS THAT WEREN'T EVEN USED IN ANGLO-SAXON ENGLAND TREBUCHET PHALANXES ALL BULLSHIT THIS ISN'T FRANK MILLER'S 1066 THIS IS HISTORICAL SHIT.
I AM DEEPLY IRRITATED BY ALL THIS.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
since some people dont like us using the comment box for badge petitions please use my post on the forums 1066 BADGES. thnx
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
if you think this game needs badges sign here--->bth102, Sylver3000,drakon112, Koegan,assem98,joseph120198,Phatass95, ,mikeiscool, mamonas,Rav3nfang,AlexOjieda
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game was a lot of fun, definitely addicting. I want to see sequels to this game, or at least games like it. And a game with more of a campaign to it, maybe purchasing units, upgrades, etc.
I liked how well put together the narration and videos were, as well as the animation for the men and the mini games.
I haven't tried multiplayer or the skirmish game, so I can't comment on those.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is so awesome. I have some humble suggestions if a sequel will come out:
1. Add a siege weapon
2. Split cavalry into heavy and light
3. Add more infantry types armed with different weapons e.g. spears, swords and axes
4. Add a weapons triangle, spears have a bonus vs cavalry, swords and axes beat spears, axes have a bonus when charging and swords have a bonus when defending
5. Add more formations, such as a phalanx for spearmen
6. Units that are resting should slowly regenerate morale
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Good game but i do think it is a bit messed up when all your men run away even when you have 1000 more people than them and they only have one group left... damn morale system ¬_¬