Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Tips : The order of difficulty of the countries you fight is really important.
At first time I played, I conquer easiest town I can find... later on the strong town gets too strong ><
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I F****N LV THIS GAME I WANT TO MARRY IT
JST GET SOME BADGES SO I CN WIN POINTS WHILE PLAYIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DJ STATIKA U KIK ASS x x x x x
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It really needs a pause button. I mean what kind of idiot would make a game without a pause button. JUST STUPID!!!!!!!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
k i just feel the need to say...if a game is bad, back it up with feedback on how to improve "this game is bullshit" doesnt help anyone!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The fact that you get money by the numbers you kill is stupid.
Little trick here: if you are about to win, simply retreat, and keep all the money you won so far.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You need to show which upgrades affect which units and by how much. A whirler, for example, is it a halebardier or an axer?
And I would put negative upgrades as well. like armor decreases speed.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Don't like the latest update:(
Use the 'easy, medium and hard' again plz:p
+ my archers suck now?
and still i get too little money:p
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This seemed quite good at the beginning, but it gets too repetative after a while.
And as someone already mentioned, money should be awarded by victory above all. The way it is, the better I am, the less money I get... now that is stupid.
Oh, and it needs badges of course ;)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Extremely counter intuitive the way that killing people gives you more money than fast victories, it rewards poor play.
Also since the new version I've yet to see an archer kill somebody, I watched my basic spearman run up to 5 archers and kill them one after another.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Latest upgrade is bad.
No longer are the archers usefull, they now just run in to be slaughtered by the close-range units.
Also, the difficulty is just too weird. How come I get pwnt by a 3% difficulty? I preferred the easy/medium/hard/v.hard difficulty rating. That actually made sense.
The only good thing it has going for it (and I am not sure if this was around before) is the fact that if you surrender, you still can get money from the round.
Rating lowered to 4/5 - would be 3/5 apart from the extra money.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
great, fun game
one thing thats sucks is that i cant replace my old crappy units with new ones... o well still a good game
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
"Difficulty 105%"? rofl
This game gets a bit boring around Difficulty 60%. At that point you're pretty much forced to lose your battles until you earn enough money for a major upgrade. Then you can beat one or two new levels and repeat the process. Takes way too long.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Could the next version also include a way to access the spending money menu from the map?
Also, I could do with an auto-charge option, and more money for victories (giving money for killing units rewards failure more than victory, since you want the battle to take longer so you can kill more guys).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
heres the disadvantage of the londswords man, they get pushed back before they attack thus giving spearmen their weakness
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Cool little game but needs some better AI - you can win some of the "hard" games by sending scouts in a single file for the entire game. Nothing but scouts. Also would be nice to know how much points each kill or unit across is worth.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Make a version 1.3 with the following:
.Pause button
.A sell unit button
.And if you can making something like a giant troll for other races,because only mountain trolls have something that hits 500
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i played against the wood elves against humans for my first level. i killed about 30 of their men, only swordsman. they killed 1.