Under rating threshold (hideshow)
heres an adea how about if a newbie has less than 10 cards just let them pick 5 cards so they wont complainand if any one is complaning about having to litle cards but acctually has 10+ cards they can just go to hell
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
There should be some kind of trading system, for cards you don't need or have duplicates of, but leaving Starters untradeable. If this cannot be implemented, then maybe Starter Cards can be slightly weaker than the real cards so duplicates can be more important.
Btw, I agree with Aldyhide that there should be new sets of cards every now and then...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ok, so I think that trading is a really terrible idea mostly because of the low number of cards and obvious potential for abuse. However, I've now got a full set and multiples of many cards. It would be neat if players like myself could give our extra cards away to those less fortunate. If something like that isn't implemented I don't really see the point of allowing duplicate characters (although having doubles of some of the items can be good).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
People should be able to use their kongregate points to buy cards. Having them get stuck with three cards they chose at the beginning is a bad tactic to keep people interested and playing.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
very good game... really addictive! But it def needs more cards... And I'm not sure about the "random" getting of cards (maybe some tournaments isntead?) Also it would be really cool to add some "rarity" sign to the cards... like 3 types or so. Would make the card collecting part much more interesting. Also maybe card exchanges between players...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
card trading = bad
the goal of the game is to get cards and use them to win; card trading will only ruin the game.
What this game needs is more cards it has only 46... if it had 100 it would be much better
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the issue with "leave game" was not that you were able to win with it. It's common practice in multiplayer-games like warcraft3 or Starcraft an even in RL-Games like chess, that you leave the game, when the chance to win is gone.
The exploit should not be hindered by damaging the basis of the game. There should rather be a maximum of left game per win-ratio.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
yeah, its kinda lame how lots of people kick the higher leveled people out because they... well they're on a higher level. they're all the same. they've just been playing for a longer time.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Those breasts sure are large. Nice game though, I'd written a longer message but there's a character limit and it got lost, which was annoying.