Under rating threshold (hideshow)
im not insulting kong....but his is pokemon with people a range thingy and big breasted women...also its a game i KNOW im gonna get bored of 1 day
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Very good game. Few reccomendations:
1. Able to challenge your friends or people through room chat.
2.Private matches (password or soemthing)
3.More cards ;P
4.Able to swap the resistances (light, dark, physical..) to create more versitility and specific decks.
5.Specialist matches (x-type charectors only to give added strength to charectors)
6.Level specific rooms to allow new players to find decent challenges more easily
That's about all i can think of now but great game and will maybe add some more ideas later xD
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
"how can u tell who is first to strike?
Flag this comment as inappropriate "
It depends on the attack speed, some are faster than others.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Very nice game, but i can't wait to have new cards in order to improve my decks ;-)
BTW, Marlblanke +1 : especially for the ones that haven't played the beta, it's a shame you can't change the starter cards you pick.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
did anybody else lost his progress?
I played yesterday, picked started cards, did a few fights.
now I I had to start all over again. :(
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
There should be a way to cancel when you're joining a match. Like if you just realize you forgot to clean the dishes but your getting matched, the only way to quit is to get a loss.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Now people can see, why games like Magic: The Gathering don't use dice. In this game, any one instance of bad luck can doom you.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Great game! It's very well put together.
Only thing I do have to say is that the Zina Beast Mistress Card is over powered in my opinion. So if you haven't grabed your starter pack yet, then i highly suggest you get this card!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
So far unimpressive. I've been beaten twice by the little boy with the blowgun. This is not a game for warriors, it is weighted to be a game for little children and girls with arrows. Some of the innates are preposterously powerful others useless.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Unfortunately, it takes cards to earn cards... I suppose I'll have to content myself with looking at the pretty pictures for the next several months until I can build a decent card supply.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@jobose: your logic is severely flawed. Getting 4 out of 5 equates to 80% as an observed outcome rate, not probability. The actually observable probability of getting 4 successful intercepts at 20% is 0.2^4 which is 0.0016 or 0.16% a very small chance, but a chance nonetheless.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
it does? :X i think u are mistaken..
marl you have a point, but its not important enough to make another update for it
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
wippedquazen; When has reading become more important than actual experience? I read the guide, I picked my cards, but when I started playing with actual people I realized that my cards (while seeming pretty neat) didn't work out that well together.
And I'm sure I'm not the only one, although I'd feel awfully special if I was.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
well marl ur wrong because there is an ingame guide be4 u pick ur cards and an exgame guide as well.. i picked my cards knowing which i want
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This was one of the worst games on kongregate....
Better of with urban rivals or magic the gathering, thats good card games..!
1/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Being unable to re-pick your start cards... blows. People should have one, maybe two "resets" where they could re-pick their cards. It's pretty wierd to ask completely new players to pick three cards PERMANENTLY when they don't even know how the game works.
/rant off
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the only luck factor is possibly getting disconnected. it takes strategy like a more sophisticated rock paper scissor
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nice game maybe in like a year there would be a like a movie thing of your game with 3d graphics and the attacks were really detailed but its still good this way. 4/5 might make it 5/5 when i start playing the multiplayer in stead of parctice
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Luck is a pretty big factor due to miss chance, critical hits, and status effect chance. A lot of the games I've lost are due to lucky crits, but I've lost and won a ton of matches due to good guesses/skills. Reading the enemy and learning his habits in the short time you have to fight is the major factor in winning. Generally speaking; if you get hit with an intercept, that wasn't luck.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@ Mdarky:
I would rather say that the luck part is based 50% on luck, but the other 50% is based on psychology.
Anticipate your foe, and counter his probable moves.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
there's problably a bug here, i have Rumiko with 50% intercept avoiding with flash power (40% avoid damage intercept) there's a 20% chance (0.4*0.5) that a intercept will succeed. but in reality my opponents did 5 intercept and 4 succeed (4/5 is 80%, NOT 20%) kongregate, can u change this please
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
stop whining already...this is a strategy game. it's not there for you to be blown away by the graphics. the game is awesome and the graphics are really good when you compare them to what other flash games are like. the other way around would suck. GO KONGREGATE!