Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@killerz: Please don't make this n00bish comments, including the flag text --- @rottendoubt: No, there isn't any history. If the game gets "stucked" either you or your enemy got disconnected. If it was the enemy a timer will appear (after it run out, you will win), if the timer doesn't appear, you should hurry to press F5 to reconnect into the game (otherwise your enemy will win the round after 60 seconds). --- @Almighty: Yes, you posted same comment 3 pages ago, already. And this topic was discussed trough: Trading system will immeadeantly cause massive abusing (Players make new accs and trade all useful cards to they're main decks), therefore there will kinda never be anything like a trade system...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It would be interesting if they could implement some sort of trading system, that would be fun... as is though, it's a 4/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
oh man, i was just playing this guy and was totally winning. on the last move where he should have died, he never did anything and it was stuck like that forever. then i think i accidentally clicked out. does that mean i lost?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
First coward of today: Allen20008 - Left after the match went 3:1
---
Second coward of today: nomaan12 - Left after the match went 4:1
---
Third coward of today: darkstarII - Left after 2 rounds when his Amaya met my Voss
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Skilletor: Uhm... exactly THAT is happening ^^ If the time runs out (round timer + 60 Disconnect seconds ALL OVER THE GAME) all your enemy cards will get set to 0 hp... you won in that case. If NOTHING happens, then most likely YOU disconnected...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
LOL Looks like The Infamous Disconnection Technique is rampant here also on Kongai. hmmm... It is happening on every multiplayer Games. The Game Developers must implement an Automatic Loss to the first one who discon, intentional or not.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It would be interesting if they could implement some sort of trading system, that would be fun... as is though, it's a 4/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Alblaka: No, right, actually. I didn't say the bench attacking decks always win, I said that the format was dominated by them. Your deck, being designed to defeat the bench-attack decks is an excellent example of how players are forced to either play the deck, play against it, or lose.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Jackson: Wrong ^^ Yesterday i beaten a L13's Bank Atter deck... i always have the right cards, that neither take big damage by bankatts (for example nor Morte, Cain, Oni etc) and on the other hand the dead-rivals of the 3 bank atters ^^
Since the most people use att decks, my deck will usually win that fight (though it still depends on the intelligence of the enemy and the 2 other cards left)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
5-card is very different from 3-card. For one thing, constructed 5-card is dominated by bench-hitting decks. As such, it wouldn't make a whole lot of sense for the same ranking earned in 3-card to apply to 5-card. Two players could earn similar rankings without ever having to play each other. Someone could consistently win in 5-card only to find themselves stomped at the same rank in 3-card. And, as much as it would be a problem using the same ranking system for the 2 different modes it would be even worse implementing 2 ranking systems for the same game. I assume this is why there is no ranked 5-card.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think, there should REALLY be 5carde RANKED matches... I don't like the luck factor of Kongai, therefore i only do 5cards (more strategy less luck).
Would be nice to see a ranked option there, too...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
hahaha Fantasmaz you are right... but rshimpa i feel your frustration some people just have enlarged egos and they dont wanna see the game saying they lost
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Yay i got the cards! thanks guys. I was a little disappointed though because i only got 4 cards... I thought I could have the whole deck.. I guess it's too much to ask for.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
When i checked "Pick a starter card" section a few weeks back, they didn't offer items, but now they do. I'm confused
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Lozai, you can if you're not playing a ranked game. If you are... then it's pretty obvious why it's not fair to be able to bail on a ranked game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
sometimes kongai just decides that you lose. I'm sitting on a 73 hp onimaru vs. a 3 hp yoshiro, guess who wins? I'll give you a hint: its the guy who dodges and then stuns 3 times in a row.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I effing sucks when you are trying to play a game witha friend, and as soon as you get into the room you get matched with someone, CREATE A EFFING CANCEL BUTTON.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
My line up is abit diffrent I have 2 people that are able to hit all and I use that for one reason. When I see how much damage the opponets cards take I can geuss what there defences are IE If I do a physcal then a dark and both no good, I know to keep someone with ligh attacks ready to fight and visa versa.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
A 5-card deck WITHOUT Zina, Amaya, and Voss totally fails, but it doesn't work nearly as well in a 3-card. If for no other reason, Voss and Amaya are easy to kill, and Zina's all-hit is limited to long range, making her easy prey to the vast hoardes of Anexes being run by everyone and their brothers.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
stimp, the problem is that those moves are slow, and use more energy, you'd have to play perfectly in order 4 it to work, cause if not they'll just hit u b 4 u can use your moves
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Stimpack -- that team is Amaya, Voss, Zina .. for a while, about half of the lower-ranked players you'd play had it. It wins reasonably often against newer players, but it's not a team you'll get a high rank with.