Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Heheheheh man this game pwns/ NorthernPolarity needs to stop spamming though so this post should take his post out.Although she is cool, Zina is not as good as i though. Her attacks are weak. Her Eye of the tiger move takes up too much energy and is not that powerful. Also it attacks people not in play and they recover health not in play. sooo :/
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
in some way the people who made the cards are homoes. the only girl that doesnt have 1/2 of their boobs showing and they arnt the size of cantalopes... in some cases water mellons, is popo -.- its realy annoying
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
pixel penguin maybe you dont have a good deck? am i right? and since this was the only game i payed for threeweeks staright i gotbored of t left for a while nd started playing again,...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Can I earn some additional cards against the computer. You could make a new card to earn every month. That'd be nice.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Zeubenelginubi, you clearly lack the iq to see the strategy in the necronomicon cards wich makes you a sub-par player, and the fact you cant see that its well balanced makes your IQ sub-par, nevermind the 100's of other players who say the same things as I did right? the fact of the mater is your logic will always be flawed while blinded by your fanboy mentality.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@pwnedage you "strongly" disagree? The best players seem to be erratic or err on the side of damage. Getting to know your opponent can help, but "having some control" over another person's swap is a figment of your imagination.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Beegum: I disagree strongly. Based on previous actions, I can sometimes guess an intercept, yet I have no control on crits.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@mobile, crit happens. Just like miss and intercept. "Intercept" just makes you "feel" like you're in control, when, in actuallity, its usually a highly unstable situation where you can take a hit and kill the target in one hit, or they have no energy. To me, crit isn't so much different than getting intercepted or missing with that perfect quick shot.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
(Read the post right below this first) Now granted, how are you supposed to yomi their mind and figure that out, but I'm just saying that you can't say that its unavoidable hax. That's applicable to the games that you lost as well. Sure, you lost because you missed your last attack or something, but what happened in that game that resulted to it boiling down to you hitting that last attack anyways? If you gained an advantage early on, maybe you wouldn't have been in that situation to begin with.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Mobile, that's not true at all. A main reason why your w/l ratio is so high is that you aren't facing the top Kongai players (which you would do near the top of the ranked ladder). I mean, I was 30-3 playing only ranked, then as i got higher and higher, i started to lose more and more because I started playing said players. I'm not saying you sux or anything, but I'm sure that you'd have much more of a challenge playing ranked. And before you say "this can't be prevented", that's rarely the case. Take your "stuck at close with cc at close example" (oh btw, when I said your pb reason wasn't valid, I meant that since it's getting changed, you can't list it as a reason why you are going to quit). The only time that would happen is if both you and your opponent switch at the same time to new characters, which is preventable if you intercepted instead of switched.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@reggy, that's the "wink's of luck" switching/weak attack/power attack/rest guessing game that the intercept button adds to the game. There isn't a good way to determine whether you'll see a pilebunker or signature slice. I do swap out, but I don't "always" swap out.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Mobile
I don't think Pilebunker is overpowered, I rarely get to use it unless I set it up carefully because people switch out or have a faster move than I do. What is over powered is Voss's Double Strike, which needs to be upped in cost or lowered in speed. Also, The old munk guys Open Palm. It could be reduced in speed. I think there are a couple of others I don;t like, but I can't remember them right now and I don't have those cards.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think there should be a campaign. that would be cool. Also, I think a challenge mode would work too. example: your givin 1 card and the other player has 2, but yours is perfect for beating them and you have to use strategie to beat the challenge. Comments?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
reggy generally youre right but a lot of people intercept which is the basic concept of the game, force your opponent to switch out and intercept if you think theyre going to do so, however theres certain times when you cant swap and your stuck with cc at close, wouldnt be a problem because pb is so slow that i could get of 2 moves before death but nope, he crits me and i die, ruining my strategy and chances of winning
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
northern now i realize what you were saying about good and long time, the arena sets i grinded i got in a couple of weeks on WoW with a 2000+ rating 2v2 pre-trinket change with a rogue ele shammy team... i was however on one of the better pvp battlegroups for arena so i never earned a high title... my pvp partner was suntsu on frostmane if you care to armory but i was one of the better rogues on the server at that time... i took a 3 month break thinking i wouldnt be too far behind on gear maybe another arena set would come out and my gear would hold up but i came to find every one even new 60 people wearing my s2 because they made it available in bgs once s4 came out so i quit for good, now going to play WAR
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
and obviously my pb complaint is valid if theyr nerfing what im asking them to nerf(im no saying its because of me, im not that retarded)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Northern... a 96 - 17 (5 or 6 are DCs) record is good regardless of who youre playing, and anyways most lower level players quit the match when they see me, im usually playing levels 5 - 9 sighaknight - 50 energy isnt high cost for a move the either one shots your character or cripples it enough to be killed by voidsream the following turn Northern again: if there werent luck dependant things it would boil down to the game's concept of rock paper scizzors mind reading,(which is what the concept of this game was in the first place) not omgwtfgoddamncritshitaaah and i realize everyone loses because of bad luck, but thats what im saying should be changed thats how i'm "dealing with it"
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Typo >.> Your pb complaint is NOT valid. Also consider playing ranked, since with your record you're probably nubstomping people in quickmatch.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Mobile Alabama: Pilbunker is getting a nerf, so that complaint is valid. Aside from that, you seem to mistake "good" for "playing for a long time". They aren't necessarily the same thing. Just because you've grinded pre-arena sets doesn't mean that you're good, you've just grinded for a long time. If there wasn't luck in Kongai, it would boil down to calculations and finding that magic damage combination that kills everyone. It's much better with luck, since it allows you hope even if you are about to die, which I think adds more incentive to staying in the game. Everyone loses because of bad luck, deal with it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I don't mind the critical of pilebunker. What I mind is the fact that I need to sacrifice Vanhessa to whatever non-starter character she meets (basically), and hope she doesn't get pounced on by a tiger with stupid fast hard hitting, even when you flee skills. After that, and a couple winks of fate and winning comes pretty easy. But it's tough to have two go against players with three strong cards when you have still have a starter.
Playing five card helps.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Pilebunker doesnt need to be nerfed. High mana cost+ low speed means it has a lot of downside.
About the cards, I'm not a fan of random drops, but it forces you to develop different strategies, making it more fun.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
okay i officially quit this miserable game with a record of 96 - 17 because 14 of those losses are luck based stupid shit i could have done nothing about and i cant stand a game like that i am so sick of online multiplayer games helping out really really bad players with stupid changes like the resilience change in WoW making arena sets 1&2 available to everyone who has no life to have top tier gear and screwing over good players... or this game where you can do everything right and lose because of missing high chance to hit attacks and being crit on with a high frequency seriously someone implement a game where good players are actually REWARDED
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
pilebunker is awesome. if you have the necronomic tome, and you use pilebunker and get a crit hit, then its an instant kill.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
pilebunker really needs to not have a crit
honestly thats so annoying i can play as good as i can and still lose because of that shit
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i agree with lee619la sort of... instead of upgrading abilities it would be nice if you could spend the points you get from achievements on equipment cards for your characters
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
spanks u have absoloutly no idea how good this game is. necronmomicon is all about luck of the draw. this game you actualy have to think to be good at. somthing you prolly havn't done in a while.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
maybe add another feature, like a shop, and maybe experience points to level up your cards power... possibly a card attack bonus for the same clan of card. Try urban rivals if you like card games on the net. Its a lot more simple and fun
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I have 27 cards, 2 of which I won actually playing the game and 25 through challenges. There's something seriously wrong with this.