Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Control Philactery it saves more that 30% of the times... In All the times I saw it (about 10) , it failed only one time...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I have a feeling that poison dart has more than 25% chance to poison enemy. Second, I find Zine, the tiger master too strong. It has fast, long range and short range good attacks and most other characters has basicaly no chance.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I wish some of those rotten apples could get their kongai access removed. They're only looking to ruin the game for the rest of us.
And I repeat my query to add some kind of blacklist.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@matt: Yes they are, currently a pirate set and a robot set I believe are confirmed to be arriving after the game gets out of beta.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The AI in practice is pathetic. If Ashi gets sent to the back, she'll stay there and Rest until she dies, and Tafari tries to Intercept every other turn.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Wow...
This game seems cool even though I don't know how to play!
I'm still learning because I think it's complitcated... :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think you should allow duplicate cards on one deck, specially for 5 cards decks, whats the point in having various cards of the same character if you can only use one?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think the chances of winning a new card should be higher for 5v5 than for 3v3. You currently get more cards per minute playing 3v3s. The other problem with 5v5 is stuff like Zina's Tiger Frenzy with Deadly Poison, which seems too powerful in 5v5 to me. Items like this need to have less of an effect the more opponents they hit or something, so if you hit 4, it should only have a 20% chance to proc instead of 80% or something like that.
And I also support being able to spectate.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Just An Idea That Popped Into My head, What About A Way You Can Click A Button Next To A Pair Battling And You Can Watch Them Battle? It Would Be Good For The Newer People To Improve Thier Game Play And Others To Learn Different Ways To Play.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
what is everyone's opinion on a 30 sec timer with a bank of 2:00 that does not renew if some of it used? 30 secs is plenty of time for most moves and you have the bank for extra time on the big decisions.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Bug: when the opponent didnt start in the browse game and you leave the game but your opponent start the game at that moment you lose the game without play.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
How about keeping track of each player's record vs. other players? It would be interesting to see how I do against certain people.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think that one should have a higher chance to earn a card in 5 card matches seeing as they take much longer than 3 card and it needs a popularity boost
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Pwnzor, I disagree, as I think switching would be awfully risky that way, so people wouldn't do it that much, and the Rumiko would be really good.
Also, how come with random (all cards), some of them say R1 and some don't? Here's a pic: http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/4081/kongbug2yu4.png
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think to give an utility to rank and level by giving a random card for each rank, and a chosen card for each level.
Don'y you think it is a good idea?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
reflect is not a fair move at all... they use it and if you have a slower chracter then there isnt a chance in hell you will win>_> <