Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@ turgalover
good one XD
but seriously, I agree. I don't think that there's any way to get the game makers to do anything about it though.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'm having a major bug that affects gameplay everytime I log on: Most of the Girls' clothing isn't loading, especially over the chest and legs. I know they are supposed to be wearing clothes, but with half their clothing missing, it looks like something out of some sicko's fantasy. I hope this is mended soon.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ravingrabbid: lol, that's the entire point of the ability
synalle: Skill rank is based on "rank points" which are won and lost during ranked matches and are affected by the skill rank of your opponent
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
How do skill ranks work? It's not based on win-loss ratio, or on the number of cards in your deck (as far as I can tell). Does it have something to do with the way you defeat opponents?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
its alright game, hopefully once more people are around to play it your servers can handle the load. seems fun enough.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'm going to repost this from May since a lot of people liked it but it died.
Mar. 27, 2008
Oh, suggestion: Wins should add 5 xp to your level, and for levels, you can fight ranked matches with opponents within 5 levels of you, friendly matches can be any level.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Bug, anex boomerang chackra did not take away it's full 37 after she got her attack boost...This is the 3rd time it has happened to me.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ravingrabbid: if juju's innate didn't heal these, he'd be near completely useless. his "portfolio" is healing and touch of doom is a nice bonus, not the other way around.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Mellow
I didn't mean that "I'm better", because I'm higher-leveled. Looking at the comments, I just noticed that most of the "new" players are either asking stupid questions, or claiming that "This game sucks, because X is overpowered".
I might agree that 90% was probably a small exaggeration.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I agree that the percentages seem off - people miss on 20% chance way more than 20%. But I like the higher chances - just change the listed numbers.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
wassup with ranked? other people of all levels can be in it at teh same time as me and it won't give me a game - for why?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I really like this game. Sometimes it seems like the percentages for miss rates or the proc rates are off (missing 3 times in a row with a 10% miss rate should be nearly impossible, but it happens fairly often.)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@ Zakid
Just because some are more low leveled then others doesn't mean 90% of them are idiots. They just maybe don't go on Kong as much as you do, or don't go for badges as much as highlevels.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
hey joodoo11 thats what makes the game a challenge i just played a match where their was a change in range every turn
but if you plan it right you can win it takes a little wits
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@happyman: If it's any consolation, the thing is working. Also, I think the guy I fought last is stealing your extra luck- it procced for him 3 times in a row >__<
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I don't know if I'm perhaps the most unlucky person ever, but my phlactery on cain solomon has failed roughly 16 times in a row. With a 30 % proc, shouldn't it work a little more?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
zakid: keep in mind that some of us have actually played more games than high level people, they just might not have as many badges in the games or may have played other game sites.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
zakid: just because we have lower levels does not mean that we are not every bit capable of lending some useful feedback. we just havent been on Kongregate as much as you have
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i have one request:
please, no more invites. People with levels 12-14 added recently are in 90% morons and idiots. I don't think their contribution is of vital importance.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the problem right now with getting cards quicker is that there are so little cards that everyone would have a full collection in no time at all.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I feel like the administrators should put a limit on how often you can change range in a row. If I have Andromeda against Helene, than the game goes on forever with us just switching, then resting
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I just started playing, and I am very pleased. The game is all in the head, as promised. While luck plays a factor, the ability to out guess/out think your opponent is the key. I'm only batting 500, but I come away from each encounter with a better understadning.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
- There should be more ways to collect cards(shop, higher percentage after win)
- The animations should be better
- Teleport should always change the range, even when the opponent switches out
I like the update on the characters, helene is less powerful
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
there's a glitch here, i did a 3vs3 against some1 else. when almost the game ended, i waited for my opponent, i could declare victory. but he was there, at my opponent it said: wait for opponent. and he could'nt declare victory. but we're talking to each other in the match chat.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
what if 5 card had its own rating / rankings
get some competition in there - right now the only 2 ways of judging how good you are favour 3 card - ranked is 3 card only and "wins" are more quickly earned in 3 card
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
5v5 giving 2 wins / 2 losses, no way. there's no way to even begin to describe how much that'd be wrong/broken/abominable. but about a higher chance for a card, good idea, as long as it is reasonable. say, a 25% improvement on the base percentile (so as of now it would be 2% for 3v3 and 2,5% for 5v5).