Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Suggestion: Can we have a game history log implemented. It'll basically tell us who someone played, and if they won or loss. It'll be just a list format, nothing fancy.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
All those saying this is a bad game.
It appears that the vast majority of us think this is a good game, as the game has 30685 ratings and rates at 4.31/5. Unless the vast majority of people give a good rating just cos they feel like it. It's officially a good game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I stayed devoted to the site, participated in weekly challenges, amassed half the cards overall, and excitedly clicked the "Kongai" game link for this?
Pretty graphics, mundane system, slow gameplay, and an overall bias towards it because its created by Kongregate...if this were a game by an independent developer I doubt if it would even get a badge.
2/5. I'm disappointed.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'm a ranking player and I agree with Richard233. It's hard for higher level players to find games and it would neat to be paired with people who actually want to play us.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ranking players should have seperate play lists, ability to call out others. "Coward lists if they refuse to fight", etc.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think betting cards is the best idea. Have it where you can chose to bet a card, the opponent doesn't see it but gets offered if he wants to bet or not. If he says no, noone loses or gains anything from the match...just an idea
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
man this game %{color:black}needs% a trade option!%{color:orange}jiggmin% if ur reading this plz add a trade option every1 wants that wut if ur friend wants 1 of ur cards and u dont?and u *should* be able 2 give away cards like ur friends offer is nothing but urs is say amaya i wish u *could* do that.if you r reading this plz add the ideas every1 wwill play kongai more!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I love the depth to this game. As a Lv3, just had a great game with a Lvl 9. It is very much like playing rock paper scissors. OF course it seems some here would claim one of those three is overpowered.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@ SaundersSlayer....thats what I was talking about....you won 2 cards within the first 4 that you played. Perhaps you didn't have many cards to start with, but I have now won over 50 games and still haven't won a card. I have 22/46 cards, so not quite 50% of them. The % isn't going my way apparently....
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
invinciproduct, No, they are balanced, like completely. just becauase they stun you more often then not doesnt mean they are unbalanced
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think the cheap fast attacks like tackle and spiked boots are to powerful they seem to stun waaayy to often. Maybe reduce the chance of stun?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
wth is all of the unmodesty? we cant say anything about sex,nudity,violence,swearwords but we CAN see a cartoon lady 1/2 naked??? wth is up with that?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
what the heck is trade spamming?
and getting scammed while trading? how the heck would that happen?
if someone trades a card willingly to another who willingly trades their card, its a fair trade, this whole scam business is rediculous.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@ harcon01 - Trading card for card should be fine... make it so that you can't trade starters. Newbies would probably be smart enough to do a little research before trading "good cards" if they ever get any for that matter.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
NO on trading!
YES on frequent card challenges.
Benefits:
people will play more worthy games on kongregate
AND
we dont have to worry about trade spamming
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
There are special/promo cards that are cosmetically different, they make no difference gameplay-wise though (much like foil cards in actual TCGs).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
A fun game...although I am not sure how well the percentage is to win cards....I have won over 40 games and haven't won any cards.(I only have 22/44?)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Trading = Bad.
People would only trade crap cards with newbies for good ones. In other words, trading would just be scams.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
theres already 'rare' cards, from the beta there were 'originals' that have a more intricate background and characters had different titles (i think ambrosia used to be called the suave)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Eh...more cards would be fair. Also if some of the cards are rare? First edition? ROFL. Shiny/Sparkly cards would show that. ;P
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
%{color:blue}THIS GAME SUCKS BADLY its so boring and pointless i don't know why u guys say this is the best game ever. IT SUCKS! no offense to kongregate but i don't like it. 1/5, i would rate it 0/5 but i can't.......well actually i can but still%