Games Achievements My Kong Sign In

Comments for Kongai

« Back to Kongai

deleteduser

Jun. 20, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) i agree

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 20, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) acid_dreams: everyone is allowed to use what strategy they like. since youre so upset of helena try building a deck (or a strategy) that could get u rid of her rather than just asking others not to use it

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 20, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) and you should be able to sell cards

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 20, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) i cant find how much damage each attack does so i recko they should make that a bit clearer ut all in all ood game

+ - !

(0)

mistermonkey

Jun. 20, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) @mike27 there already is a chat for the 2 players.

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 20, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) will u tellthe lower ranks to stop getting helena and doing nothing but shield bash so u cant hit them it gets annoying!!!!!!!!!!!!

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Yeah CainKellye, you're right. That would make sense.

+ - !

(0)

CainKellye

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Intercept should be disabled when the opponent has only 1 card. (The one that's in play.)

+ - !

(0)

hot12345

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I dont find any bug

+ - !

(0)

bieo

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) It's the same for hitchance with the attacks. They aren't right cause i always miss

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Mike27 There is an in game chat already

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) when you say about a skill that it "has a chance", it should be 20% chance, not 60%

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) It's a great game, 5/5, but I think they should make an in-game chat, just for the playing 2 players.

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Cards should be stronger against some cards and weaker against others but the effect now is just not strong enough. sometimes it just becomes a "patience" game against the same few cards.

+ - !

(0)

garcia1000

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) try random deck wat

+ - !

(0)

Pip3r4o

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I agree to david_100 but how can i choose other cards....I didnt chose buff starter cards and now every one is more powerful than me . :-( now i cant play please help

+ - !

(0)

evilducks

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) -i like it- I LOVE IT its a really good game.

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Gotten now to 30 games played. Main comments based on this: (i) the cooldown counter after swapping should be made longer. Now, there is too much swapping and intercept is not enough of a deterrant. Also, (ii) 2% chance to win a new card when you win a game is just not enough. The incentive to play from this point of vie wis just zero. Also, (iii) many more cards are needed. Currently, everyone is playing with the same cards and knows how they function. Finally, (iv) the deck building is very limited, also due to the number of cards. There is no real strategy involved, like e.g. in M:tG.

+ - !

(0)

kemperak

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) the oragami cranes picture doesnt show in deck builder.

+ - !

(0)

Pip3r4o

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) IT IS GREAT GAME KONGREGATE.But i need a deck i have only 3 cards.Now i will do chalange for the fourth

+ - !

(0)

Gchick

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I just got a strange bug where I couldn't see the opponents character. I never knew if we were ranged or close.

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) The name of your deck must be unique to you,in other words you can't have two decks with the same name

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) you shouldent have to have unique deck names. after this game goes public, there going to be too many names so it'll be hard to find one that isn't taken.

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I think duplicates of anything should be placed together with some kind of visual hint as to a duplicate or a number by the card indicating that you have more than one. Also, turn time is long.

+ - !

(0)

AlienKittyInc

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) @biliamda the forfiet option is under 'options' (the green button on the right of the bottom toolbar)

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) i like it you learn tendencies of other players quickly and utilize your cards the best of your ability

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) It's quite a slow game, even with a 3 vs 3 deck, and somebody who is quite obviously going to lose can stall for quite a long time. Maybe there should be a resign option or something simliar? otherwise, quite a tactical game. A tutorial on the strategy wouldn't go amiss, though.

+ - !

(0)

Plix

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Absolome think of it like math. multiply your wins by to and thats the percent likeliness, its not the most accurrate but it works.

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I don't like it very much. If you could make a way, like you earn points from enemies if you win, that you could buy new cards.

+ - !

(0)

Malachi

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Nevermind, found it under options.

+ - !

(0)

Malachi

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Is there a way to exit a single player game?

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) the rate of getting new cards should be increased. i'm practically having to do challenges only to get cards

+ - !

(0)

Absolome

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) i also think getting a new card every new level would be cool

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) There really should be a way to earn new cards without pure luck involved. Even if it's insanely difficult (reaching a high level or number of wins), just as long as it's not based purely on luck.

+ - !

(0)

Absolome

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) i think the chance of getting a new card should be increased, i hate seeing the same set of cards over, and over, i want some diversity

+ - !

(0)

salox

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) the switch cooldown item has the same image that has the poison one.....and you say: "am I poisoned???"

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Can't seem to get authenticated, also, the screen is just a little to big for my moniter :/

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) cheese101: no B should not get the previously stolen abilities. think of it as the gem gets them not the characters, and the gem doesnt steal items.

+ - !

(0)

xXRamenxLoveXx

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Time - needs to be shorter, definately, I had same problems with people just not doing anything

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) had a really annoying bug! My opponent didnt move, timer ran out, sat through "waiting for opponent..." clicked declare victory..... and LOST... I have NO idea how that makes any sense especially since I had the upper hand in the match, gah

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Timer should probably shorter, i was just in a game with a guy that wasn't doing anything and it took forever, its basicly like 2 minutes a round because you get 60 seconds for choosing a distance and an attack

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) if sum1 uses gem of souls to get anothers innate ability(person A),and A is then killed by B,shouldnt B get both innate abilities???

+ - !

(0)

Ionio

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I like that the multiplayer games put you and your opponent in a private chat. I had a good laugh on my first game (although i got whooped :)

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) if sum1 uses gem of souls to get anothers innate ability(person A),and A is then killed by B,shouldnt B get both innate abilities???

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) bug report: i begin a battle and all my people were dead before the beginning..

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Amazing game! I'm having a great time playing it. I have to agree with sorroth though, the attack animations and pauses needs to be sped up for better overall enjoyment.

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I'd quite like to see a *Block* move for all characters that takes maybe 10 energy and reduces the number of incoming hit points. At the moment most characters can only fight or run, so when you can't afford to attack and you don't want to swap out then all you can do is stand there and "Rest" as the other guys hits you in the face (ah, how restful).

+ - !

(0)

Plix

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) I dislike the way stunning works

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) Great game. It takes a bit to load up the first time, and the on-screen hints feel like they get in the way a bit, but it's easy to learn, fun to play, and it has all the makings of a great collectible card game. 5/5 if I could rate it right now.

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Jun. 19, 2008

Under rating threshold (show) fun game lots of fun keep it for these ppl only tho xD

+ - !

(0)

  • add a comment
Developers Players Support YouTube TikTok X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Join the conversation Join Discord
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Code of Conduct
© 2026 Kongregate