Under rating threshold (hideshow)
In ranked match, I won two games and my ranking appeared to go down.
Perhaps I disconnected while trying to get a game?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
wtf i couldn't see my opponents character on the field he was invisible and when i had eneough of that yellow stuff under ur health i couldn't use a move wtf
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The only time the proc should be confusing is when there are multiple effects. Zina has 100% proc to knock a buff off the enemy 40% chance to stun and bleed with MC. Helene has 30% chance to get extra energy, just 30% not 30% of 25% or anything. Popo has 100% chance to proc a 3x crit instead of the normal 1.5x crit, but he only crits 50% of the time. I agree though the cards should be clearer.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i like the game but plz give another chance to pick starter cards after you have played a bit so you accully pick good ones instead of onest that look cool
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
...One more: if "chance" in my other examples really is number that isn´t told, then doesn´t Helenes sword bash really suck? Proc 30, that is, 30% probabillity to have a chance? What does that mean? Actual chance sometihng like 30% of 25% = only about 8%? Aaaarrrrggghh!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Explanations aren´t clear enough. Why is there nothing that tells how big the chance of some abilitys are? Say if Proc stands for the chance of a buff/debuff to work, but the explanation of the ability has the word "chance" in it then how can the player know? How does the game know? 1. Popos slingshot has Proc 100 and "high chance to crit for triple damage", supposedly it means that the crit allways deals triple damage, but nothing on the card tells the success rate of crit, just that its "high" 2. Zinas mistress´s command has Proc 100 and "all tiger attacks have a chance to cause bleeding and stun". If this means that it allways adds the possibility to stun&bleed, then how big is the possibility actually? I really don´t wanna just guess, the info on the cards should be clear enough.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I believe, every few levels, you deserve a card, or every time you win, your chance goes up a little until you get one, then it resets. It also needs spectator mode.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
it would be cool if the background got a symbol or something else on the "more info" box. example: if you moved your curser over a dark attack like vamp kiss then the background on the "more info" box should turn purple or it should get the dark attack ikon etc.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
From what I´ve heard, the chance of aquiring new cards is way to low, it doesn´t seem fair that someone who has won 200 games only gets one or two cards while someone with only ten wins gets the same amount. I think it would be fair that the more wins you have without getting a card, the better the chance of gaining one. For example every ten wins could raise the chance of getting a new card by a set prosentage, and after every time you gain a card the chance would go back to the default 2%.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
“Intercepted rumiko and missed. remove this broken feature. In a mind game I should be rewared for mind reading"
yeah and I lost a game, I think they should remove the ability for me to lose.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think you should change the starter cards after understanding the game
Also change the getting-new-cards-rate
Game itself is quite entertaining! Good work
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
after the timer on the other persons computer is finished they should lose instantaneously......without the 45 sec timer after.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Well cyto, by the time you reach lvl 16 you also have a crazy amount of wins, not to mention the weekly challenges. That's quite a few cards.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@garcia1000: ok if you look at rumiko's innate she has a *50% chance to dodge intercepts* and you *shouldnt* be able to switch against tafari if your a good player you can avoid his attacks for the most part
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
"Intercepted rumiko and missed. remove this broken feature. In a mind game I should be rewared for mind reading" I totally agree, also I think we should remove Tafari's broken innate because I should be able to switch if I think he will attack. hax
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ok umm fatdoggie if u get a card per level imagen when ur a level 50 u will propally need more than 100 games 2 level up
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i think the game should have a tradeing system since i dont have so cards i need and others have but need some of my cards so i think it would be a great deal of help with 1
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Id say add health to the characters, dont let poison or bleeding stack, and moves that stun or replace opponents turn need to be slower and/or take more magic/mana. Maybe even have a card that works for everyone in your hand or deck rather than just who is attacking. And possibly switching cards being a debuffer.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i like this a lot but you should be able to alter starter cards because based on what i know now i would definatley change them
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You don't know how important those first 3 cards that you pick that stay with you. I want to go back and pick better cards.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Polito: I read that Sirlin will downgrade Helene when there's next update. It was probably just speed 6 for Shield Bash and maybe speed 7 for Frenzied Strikes. Look for more info on his site, www.sirlin.net
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the wait time definitely needs to be shorter. Half the time I have to wait the full minute before my opponent does something. Also the game chat is the same as the room chat, what happened to the original game chat?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is amazing! Mmmm... Yes! But there should be more cards! It gets boring using the same cards again and again.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
tuckanroll:
To be honest, say you have a 70hp character. We'll assume the worst and you have a 70 hp char against Ambrosia.
On turn one, you probably take down 20-30 hp on ambrosia. She takes down 6 of yours. Say this keeps on happening. In around three turns, you have taken 36 damage, and it is nearly inevitable you will die. However, you have killed ambrosia and have a few turns to bring down the next one too. It's quite balanced, imo, and I think it is fine.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
no stacking of buffs. You should not be able to put 4 bleeding rituals or poisons on someone to where their health drains fully in 4 or 5 turns because you cast something that attacks them for 6 damage each time. Either increase health, remove stacking or both.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
hmm.. imo you should get new cards faster in the beginning. I have now played 40 (15 won :S), without gaining any. Would be nice motivativaoin if you gain 1 card each time you "leveled"
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Maybe I also am just another stupid noob, but IMHO I agree the wait time is too long. It makes the game so slow it cuts back on the fun factor.