Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Random: If they are actually afk and passing both phases, I would propose that they auto-forfeit after 4 rounds of that. If they're playing and just playing slowly, eh - the timers aren't that long anyway, and some people think out their options slower than others.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Slim/Twinge..something that HAVE to chance is the stallers..After..lets say 5 rounds or 3 rounds passing..u should be able to declare victory..i mean it takes like 20-30 mins to finish an AFKer off.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Yes I say the time limit should be 15 seconds/move. I make my moves in 5. In my first few games 15 seconds was still enough.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
/is there anything you can do when someone is deliberately wasting your time by waiting to the max time limit each turn and hoping you will forfeit?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Twinge, he has a point. Alot of people just walk away and let the time bleed by and they hope you'll forefit. There's seriously nothing more annoying.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
SlimOne: Ranked matchs would have to be the same time limit for all involved. You could add a 'no time limit' option for unranked, but that would be pretty pointless as nobody is complaining about not having enough time. Overall, the time limit is set to a good amount, and some people just think through their options slower than others. Have a little patience.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ok i have another complaint about this game.. my last one is that you have to wait a minute for a disconnect. My new one is that you have to wait 40s for each move. This gives another way for losers to waste your time -- walk away from the screen. There should be an overall time limit, so if you take over a minute on consecutive turns you lose.. or let the users agree to a time limit system ahead of time
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@alblaka: I accepted the said game in 3 seconds. If it says that I have 30 to accept, they should give me at least 10 :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The worst thing about this game is that it makes you wait 60s on a disconnect. Ridiculous it happens all the time, it should be like 10s.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ppl!if you havent heard that new cards are coming they are!(knights,robots,witches and pirates)so plz stop complaining about new cards r needed
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Destroyer96: Uh, hate to break it to you, but Skill Rank 20 is considered pretty bad and/or new :P At any rate, the skill rank system only lets you play + or - 15 skill ranks at most, so newbies can't really play anyone good until they win a few games and pull SR10-15 anyway. In addition, playing people better than you is often a good way to learn to be better yourself.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
socipath: Actually, intercepts are somewhat rare in higher level play because they are such high risk; say you intercept there while Andro rests, now you're at an energy disadvantage.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is very good and it would be a whole lot better if there was a 2v2, more cards, and a begginer zone so us pros wont have to keep bullying nubs.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
game is wicked as i love it! even though i suck it is still wicked as ill give it 5/5
i think i got a bit over board when i was doing the hard out moves and wasting energy when i could have just killed my opponent with a basic move lol... |:B
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The game isn't complicated, its just a matter of guessing your opponents move. Being bad at this is like being bad at poker
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Of course, if You let her do that, saying that way You can say Cain is overpowered when he is low hp and uses Tantrum...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Fexen, enchant blade +Charkra slash when she has less than 20 hp = 42 damage at 9 speed. She's not weak at close range at all.