Under rating threshold (hideshow)
lol sxv
maybe you were against popo or someone with a feather?
or if someone had a ring of curses and you were too slow to notice?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ok what i REALLY hate is when you've already won, then get a little lucky, and your opponent blames the whole game on luck
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Of course it's possible. Miss 3 times at 20% miss chance = (1/5*1/5*1/5) = 1/125 = a little less than 1% chance. Missing twice at 2% is only .04%, but not impossible. This would have to hold up over many more tests to be remarkable.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
% r wrong....20% to miss an enemy and i missed him 3 time in a row...it's not possibile...also 2% miss and i missed him 2 time in a row it's not possible do something pls
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
wringsteak: If VV's DS cost 40, she's be completely awful. While DS IS quite powerful, keep in mine that VV herself is also fragile. She has only 70hp, 1pr, and 0dr making her very susceptible to other attacks. |||| A +2 EB for Helene is actually +12 on FS, which is more than Anex's +8. Keep in mind Anex is using an entire turn to get it enchanted as well. |||| ValkAnex is common, certainly, but not everywhere. She's in about 40% of all decks. She's powerful, but not godly; avoid putting her in the powerzone and she's not as threatening. The main nerf she needs is simply dropping ValkCharm to +1 speed instead of +2; past that very little is needed. |||| Tweed43: You CAN win cards on forfeits.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
wow this is gay, I just played a guy with a crappy connection, and he dced, but i dont have the declare victory window. Its frozen at the waiting for opponent part oif the combat phase.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Vanessa Voss is really good. I like andromeda and yoshiro for their "fast attack that hits even on switches"-- it kills enemies under 35 health pretty easily.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i think, double slash dont cost too little.
try phoebe, or voss or andromeda, or juju .
30 energy for juju to hit 40.
voss double slash can crital and hit 76.
andromeda no energy to interrupte light magic and hit you want 18 damage.
i don't see a point to say double slash is spammable because double slash guy only have close range and easily get into trouble if it is in range. Most player has both range attack.
andromeda, Tafari, ubuntu, popo, juju, cc can beat the double slash guy if play well.
no way double slash guy is spam..
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
yay for rng-based rape - had tafri with 7 - count 'em SEVEN - debuffs from ring of curses. he didnt miss a single poison dart, poison procced on all but 2 of them and hit with the ambush at -70% when i had to risk it because of the utter, total rng rape.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
charmander - alomost every person i play who uses a premade has anex. i mean almost EVERYONE. this clearly indicates she needs a hard nerf. as for double slash it is WAY too spammable. from range she does NOT suck - ray of light is expensive, but provides a serious deterrent and radiance burst is an excellent move. double slash does too much damage has too high a crit but most importantly costs far too little.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Lol there is a mistake in the card album.I was reading Zina's description, cause she was hot, then it said, "None can escape HIS attacks."
Zina clearly was hot, had breasts and had long hair.Unless sex change was possible in their time.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
VV, for the most part, sucks at far. Nerfing double slash would make her suck close up too. Anex is clearly a superior character, but I think after you calm down a bit, I think you'll realize your suggestions may be a bit over the top. You really want her to be another "one hit wonder"? (how would you deal damage other than power toss?) Not to mention she'd be an auto-kill for Tafari...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
and anex's enchant blade needs to be brought in line with helene's down to 2, or make it cost 30. +8 damage is just stupid.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
im sick and tired of taking on the same cards every match.
nerf anex. she needs a brutal nerf. all her attacks do too much damage and their effects are way too powerful. slash needs its slow effect reduced to 1. (even 1 can be devastating, particularly with valkyrie charm) boomerang needs to have hit reduced to 90 and damage reduced to 20. power toss needs its proc % reduced to 30%.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
As for people stalling... eh. I've never had a problem with it. Some people play slowly for legitimate reasons, e.g. planning a few moves ahead or figuring out the odds of certain things happening (these are usually why I have some slow turns occasionally). The timer is a reasonable length, and even if people are waiting it out the whole time it really isn't that long. If you're that impatient you could also do something in another tab until you hear the sound notice that it's the next phase :P
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
RootRanger: To be fair, a lot of new players don't even know there IS a forfeit button. It's often not done with malice. Occasionally it's also a legitimate disconnect, too (especially if they drop when they're winning). As for CC, RumiScroll is a pretty strong lead against him, and so is Ubie. |||| freddunkin: You really can't have a horrible win/loss ratio and still be SR30, if you're looking at ranked games. Unranked are irrelevant, of course. Realistically it's gong to be nearly impossible to have less than around 1.1:1 win:loss to maintaince SR30 because of how the rank system works. |||| blackhole42: Rare, and it sucks, but that's only 1 in 1600. I've had 1 in 5500 beads, and I've heard of even worse ;O Kongai certainly has luck, but for the most part it averages out. You'll just get a few freak games that swing one way or the other on rare occasion. |||| freddunkin: A lot of people do not look at the move their Amaya is blocking, no. I've even forgotten a few times ;/
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Kongai taught me that 0.25% isn't all that uncommon...and that 5% happens all the time. New ideas about chances and randomness are being infused into my head :p But still consecutive two signature slice miss is...sad..(sigh)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
waiting for opponent...60,59,58,57,56,55,54,53,52,51,50,49,48,47,46,45,44,43,42,41,40,39,38,37,36,35,34,33,32,31,30,29,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20,19,18,17,16,15,14,13,12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0,Declare Victory. -.-'
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
that's life...but think about it. we all play so much we don't even realize all the times that doesnt happen. it probably evens out
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Personally it doesn't bother me when people take a long time to make a move. I think the basis behind their argument, freddunkin, is that people will wait until the last moment to move specifically to get people to quit so they get free wins.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Today, I played Kongai. My Vanessa Voss was against another Vanessa Voss. Neither had any buffs or debuffs. We both used Double Slash. My opponent got a crit and I missed. This happened again on the next turn. The chances of this happening are 0.000625. FML
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
RootRanger, thanx. You are absolutely positively correct. Polkin should be banned. Freddunkin is messed up. Games are meant for enjoyability not for making someones free time a pain in the ass. Dude!! Get a grip!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
no fredd, spencer has a point. polkin is intentionally joining a game ONLY to let his time expire or wait until the last second. he even admitted it. games are not meant to waste time, they are meant to make the spare time you have enjoyable. you lose, freddunkin, spencer wins.