Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ive actualy got 2 rather good sugestions i think. 1) Items that effect your entire team and 2) Attacks so slow that if someone swaps out they hit the next char in line. good? or bad?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Are the new cards even confirmed? or does everyone just seem to think because theres pictures there will be new cards?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Good game once you really try it ! 4/5 because luck is to much important, i already lost a game because opponent Phylactrery worked 3 times T_T
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@ faning "chris phylactery is also revives your character permanently i mean if you get revived, you will die next time as usual from attack" - No idea what you just said, but what I said is that Phylactery procced 6 times. 6 times I landed an attack bringing my opponent to 0 health, on 6 different turns. 6 times the little green +1 rose from Cain's head. So if you're trying to say maybe it didn't proc 6 times then forget it. :p
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
chris phylactery is also revives your character permanently
i mean if you get revived, you will die next time as usual from attack
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
My entire deck just got destroyed by Cain Soloman w/ Phylactery. It procced at LEAST 6 times. That's a .0723% chance (less than 8 in 10,000). I'm not complaining, just thought I'd share. :p I always thought Phylactery was useless, and most of the time it is, but now I see why people use it. lol
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@purepancakes: That tells you not to put same Character cards more than once. You may, however, put more than one of same type Item Cards. (In One Deck)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I won a card during battle then when i try to put it on a deck it shows up as Helena The Swordsman then when i try to save it says " No Duplicating Cards!"
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Zz01: Maybe thats because the both of you used Open Palm, and the both of you lucikly stunned.... lol. whats so amazing about that..
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
First time this has happend to me (in almost 1000 games): both me and my opponent stunned at the same time (Yoshiro vs. Yoshiro) Update of stunning?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
lol i got 2 cards in a row... i first got Amya and then Zina and from Zina fight i also got:
Playing to Win
Dude! You just completed the Playing to Win achievement in Kongai and won the Playing to Win badge and 30 points!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
......That is if Shman15 is really 27... how do you actually know if he's not 13 anyway? Well enough about that. The main thing is.. this "serious" argument about nudity should really stop because its really unimportant, paradoxical and by far, noisy. please just stop the arguments. give air for some Kongai-strategy-tactics-experience-bugsreport-comments. Please.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
3/4 of the web may be dedicated to watching boobs for you poke but there are others out there that have better things to do with their time.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Serious comments I see here. Shall it be the last time for such misunderstanding. 3/4 of THE WEB is for watching boobs. If you prefer watching drawn ones here, there is sth wrong with you. :]
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Oh, and this is what you wrote since Im sure youll delete it:
Shman15 Jan. 10, 2009
jagger im 13 and im offended i mean its not really mature
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
lie? man if you like it dont preach to me about whats offensive and whats not i just think that it would be better were it not like that
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
to Shman15 and hutchy96. It's not about if your offended or not. it's about the fact that BOTH of you had to lie about your age to make an account. and i think the only thing "immature" about whatever nudity there is, is how instead of ignoring it, your all just whining about it.