Under rating threshold (hideshow)
RamboBatman 94,56% of all numbers are drawn out of thin air. So as long you didn't actually make a tally sheet, or have any exacter definition of when a game was desided by luck instead of skill. Your numbers aren't any better than of anybody else, just because you make a longer story to draw them out of thin air.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Consider this game would be played by a professinal this game hardly has any skills at all.
Say you play against a professional, he will likely not predictable what he does (attack/intercept/switch), so actually no matter what you do, it is likely to be right or wrong. So you are unpredictable too...
Its like the classic paper/stone/scissor game. Thinking about playing it against a "professional", you have exactly the same chances of win/lose. Sometimes however humans are imperfect, and you can win more often if you can discover patterns in their behaviour. As long the other doesnt discver the pattern in you, because you think you discovered his pattern, the game is still winnable.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
takes to long to load some times, and i don't think it should be random chance, char do to much damge to each other, which takes a little stradgie out of it
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
HELLRAISER3: I don't know what sort of crazy math you are doing but a statement like "this game is actually 95% luck and 5% skill" requires some actual evidence to be considered valid. Consider the following, I have played about 1700 matches (before you start, yes, I know I'm a nerd). Of the 390 matches I have lost about 50 were due to bad luck (last minute misses, my opponent's 3 consecutive crits, etc.) Of the 1310 matches I have won about 30 I should have lost but then won due to the same sorts of circumstances. So, of 1700 matches the outcome of about 80 was determined by the uneven distribution of luck. So that makes a ratio of skill-determined matches to luck determined matches of about 20:1 or 5%. From this I can say the game is actually 95% skill and 5% luck.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
bombatcat: Whatever the luck element in the game, it hasn't changed. It has not become more or less luck reliant. As for Andromeda, the only move whose chance to hit didn't make sense (trueshot) got changed. As for a rematch option, while it may take a little more effort you can still fairly easily replay the same person by setting up a private match.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game has become too reliant on luck. Every game has luck change the tide and there are to many imbalances. Why does andromeda even have a chance of missing attacks? She's an ARCHER? Shouldn't she be at 95% at least? Crits are coming out of everywhere...like 5 in one game on moves that don't have a crit chance. I don't know, used to like it, but it's not strategic enough (yes i know, there's some strategy with guessing etc., but there doesn't seem to be enough) I still think there should be a REMATCH option, get to it kongregate, replaying someone increases the strategy element.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
There is a big difference between luck and chances.
1:1 ratio will mean we all have the same chances
2:1 ratio or whatever else, means either one have more skills or luck.
Luck is when you have 1% to hit and you hit 999,999 times out of 1,000,000.(thats 99.9999% chance and not 1%!!!) How is it possible?
It is cause if u continue to play to 100,000,000 you lose 99,999,999.Its still 1% overall regardless if you will never play even at the 1 million times to see your chances to kick in.
This game is actually 95% luck and 5% skill.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
If Zina kills someone with an attack that should trigger leafy trap, it doesn't because beast feast triggers first. Thjis is unfair.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Yeah, I maintain a 2:1 or 3:1 win ratio. You do get lucky, but guessing when your opponent will switch or not takes skill, a good sense of second-guessing and knowing to spot a bluff - or you could just be smart like me and use an attack that hits fleeing opponents. ^^
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Unlike Yugioh and magic this game relies on Skill rather than who has the best cards. There is skill in predicting your opponents moves, stacking the percentages in your favor, and setting up powerful hits. There is very little luck in this game; if this game is all luck, why do I have a 2-1 win/loss ratio? if it was all luck I would have a 1:1 rartio.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
"Man Versus Machine Challenge" keeps staying longer and longer. Everybody that wanted that card has it! Damn.
Oh by the way i played "Magic: The Gathering" some days ago. There rules sucks too. But this games rulset sucks more. (Both are nothing comapred to most recent YU-GI-OH rulset). This game has to match bars and to mutch randomness. The is only one source of randomness acceptable in an card game: The Stack. The Stack? Which Stack? Do you knew what is missing?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
LambieXD: This is a frequent issue that people have with quickening powder. The item causes some of your moves to appear with an increased speed. The number as it appears does not represent the actual speed of the move. You cannot predict whether or not your move will be faster on any given turn.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i think there should be a warning or some sort: for players under aged, please read the Instructions section first.. i got a critical and he calls it "hacking"... i dont know whether to laugh or get mad...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Eh, I was Zina (Flash Powder) vs. Le Morte with a really annoying guy calling me n00b. I was gonna go Eye of the tiger +3 Speed = 8 speed, and kill him, but he turned out going first, and Vampiric Touch knocked her out? Got a reason for this, Kongai? Fix this, please, or if any of the other users know why, tell me.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The server has been really troublesome after the latest update. The connection is unstable, and people are lagging out left and right and losing games they shouldnt be. Kongregate should really look into fixing this. It's very frustrating
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
always same card gotta be lot sof card i must say wow man wtf i have never seen it i never say this when playing this game ^^
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
there seem to be lots of issues with this game lately revolving around the sever, the game often crashes, server often falls apart, and other similar things
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
it makes me angry when juju hex crits agianst anex. which happens everytime to me for some reason so i end up eating a 87 power toss's left and right.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
glitch: When your opponents switch to a card which has very low health when you use a mass attack like radiance burst, the card appears with 0 health, and the game stops
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ive known guys that dress like girls. and the o ending leads me to beleive it could be male. popa seems more feminine. or like a grandparent.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
well i think popo is a girl since theres 10 girls and 10 guys all in all . GIRLS ( 5 amazon, 1 Martial Artist , 2 Villagers [Including Popo], 2 Vampires) and Guys (4 Martial Artist, 3 Villagers 3 Vampires)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Congratulations! You've just completed the Man Versus Machine Challenge! You have earned a card from our collectible card game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Oh, and it is far more likely for a girl to have a gender identity crisis (tom-boy anyone?) before puberty than a boy would be dressing like a girl (curls in hair, etc) before puberty
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
LOL - Popo is a girl.
She has large eyes - estrogen! Part of the clues is that her name is Popo - The Younger.
I'd say Popo was say, 11 years old and about to hit puberty. Also, she has ring curls under that pig helm, and what looks like a slightly smaller waist than hips...
... and yes, girls 'play' with sling-shots
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Say, anyone else been seeing the Necronomicon activate a lot? I just got hit by it 4x in a row... the chances of that happening are .81% (it's a 30% chance to activate)
Am I just really really unlucky, or is anyone else seeing this?