Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i´m an Anex + Sharpening Stone user and i love her the way it is . But I hate that Anex+Valkyrie Charm , because it ruins a little too much the balance of the game. So please nerf the card , not poor little Anex :).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i disagree. if annex without charm, annex is completely useless fighting, Le Morte.
I think annex speed for boomerang should be 6
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i <3 seeing anex with ANY item but valk charm.
SO much easier to deal with. still needs a small fix, but no charm makes her almost well-balanced.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@dhji - thanks for being yet another sr30+ player who should know better than to just close the window instead of forfeiting. its pretty poor behaviour.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
who agrees that to make helen better her inate should be that she has 25% to block all attacks.. it would make her more powerful and they could call it like, "sheild block"
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Dumb question: is there a difference between starter cards and replay cards in terms of performance or anything else?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
List of people that leave without pressing forfeit: Ashtaway,
Pielucha,
farewell,
H3rbix,
happypomelo,
czarny84,
alan014,
topera,
davobio
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Dick - If you really wanted to do the math, you'd see that Phoebe needs to either crit or stun (and not miss PL) to win against Anex at far, for a net of 30.6% =) Of course, you could also complicate matters by looking at the chances both miss, etc. but that's pretty rare. Simple enough to say Phoebe wins about 1 in 3 though, I guess :/. |||| ddent123 - Rumiko is basically perfect - she is strong without being overpowered. 70% Evis is not 100%, and 50% chance to dodge intercepts is not 100% either. The numbers are correct. She completely sucks against tanks (especially Oni), and generally only matches are even does slightly worse against people like VV, Yoshi, etc. |||| Kenji135 - If your opponent's Yoshiro tried to intercept your Onimaru, there probably wasn't much *thinking* involved in the first place ;P
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The mechanics are the same, but good players using ValkAnex are a lot more threatening than crap players using her, same with JujuFeather - and better players mostly play ranked. (Partially true with any char, of course, but some don't shine at all with bad players.) |||| I didn't have a chance to play back in the day, but best I can tell ValkAnex was never bad and Helene was never good - players were just dumb and didn't know how to range dance. Helene is not bad because of a slowed FS & SB; she would still be bottom tier if she reverted to her old self. Likewise, ValkAnex with a 90% BC is still top tier. |||| Re: the meta, you don't need to run Ubie/ValkAnex/CC to do well in ranked, but you should be at least aware of the meta. You can actually run someone like MLM and still do well in ranked, but I don't think the same is true of Helene (and probably Andro/Phoebe either with ValkAnex popularity). I think random in ranked gives you better odds than running Helene on purpose.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
RamboBatman - Having lots of bad options isn't better than having 1 good option in most cases, so having a lot of options doesn't make Helene good when all of her options are usually subpar. People also like to say how she is cool because she can deal all 3 types of damage, but that is really not a significant advantage at all. |||| As for ValkAnex, Matching speed 7 absolutely should not be ignored - 37 (in powerzone) or even just 25 damage that you wouldn't get in otherwise, nearly every single game? That's better than other items (even after accounting for resistances, dropping damage to 34.3/22.3) which only average 10-20 extra damage per game, and it is highly relevant for all of her moves - not just BC. Throw in an enchant too and you're talking 30.6/46.6 from another BC hit.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Heh, I played with an opponent, he uses the onimaru while I uses yoshiro. At first, he keeps attack and I always exchange, den he started intercept but that time I stay instead den later he hit but luckily, I change. This support that this games only require you to think like your enemy
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
rumiko is a cheat.
rumiko has 70% chance to stun opponent and I have not seen any chance Eviscent does not stun opponent.
from range rumiko use only 35 energy to make 44 damage.
samari is the only guy can beat rumio by using sword flurry but from range, samari is still losing.
rumiko can also switch out without losing damage.
how can anyone beat rumiko , rumiko is too strong by switch and stun.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Man, long comment not my style, anyway, I think this game is all about psychology, just try to predict your enemy next move =D
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Man, Rambo, you made me do maths. I hate that. Seat of the pants every time hitherto. Turns out the absolute worst-case scenario (long) for Anex/Valk isn't as bad as I assumed. Higgy can't kill without a crit. Phoebe? She's got a 30% chance of not being dead.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Anyway, I don't think I'll convince you or Twinge that Helene isn't terrible but I'd suggest going to sirlin's page and checking out beta-Helene, she used to be ridiculous and they just went a little overboard when they nerfed her.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Also, the metagame you mentioned (anex, cc, vv) was around long before ranked was popular (though at the time yoshi was more popular than anex because she had yet to recieve her buffs) and let me tell you, I know how boring playing against the same decks gets; its the main reason I stopped playing top tier kongai. The aspect of the game that has always been the most fun for me is priming my opponents and then violating their expectations for tactical gain. People these days tend to rely on attacks like boomerang chakra in order to finish characters with 100% certainty. While this is a good way to kill a character its much more fun (and certainly better if you can pull it off) to kill with an intercept. Helene, despite her faults (and lord knows she has a few) is useful for forcing switches as people try and take advantage of her less than stellar energy costs.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Dick: i'm not a mathematician but, 65+4+3=72 potential light damage from an insignia using higashi and anex has 70 hp plus 6 light defense, leaving her at 4. And, while she will die in subsequent turns to the burn, she is alive at least long enough to kill higashi with a toss.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nope, un-valked Anex against Insig Hig runs the risk of being toasted without a hit. Thus the Valk. It's the odds you see. Worse case scenario (with valk) is a dead in the water, clutching on to life hig and a dead Anex. The other possibility (50/50)is a dead Anex and two of your characters with huge chunks missing. You were wondering what that Radiance Burst was good for ....
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Yup, Rambo, the mechanics are the same. The meta is different. The high ranking players you've played in unranked aren't putting out the first team. They're putting out their "fun" decks and aren't too concerned if they lose. Immerse yourself in ranked. When you get to R30 you'll have been swimming in a Anex (Valk)/ CC(Necro or girdle)/ VV (Necro or vial) sea for some time.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Dick: I honestly do not know what you're talking about. Are you discussing the value of valked anex vs. higashi? I believe that all that the valk does in this case is make a winning matchup for anex slightly worse. Unvalked anex takes a chi blast and then kills higashi with power toss. Valked anex simultaneously takes the blast, and probably knocks higashi into the bench. In both cases anex ends up exactly the same but, without the valk higashi is dead and with it he is alive. Also, I don't understand your reference to phoebe (although I realize I've left out powerlash in my previous post).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Seem's we're writing at the same time Rambo. The scarcity of Cain is due to the proliferation of Anex/Valk and CC. Helene's underpowered or over-costed. You can debate which (or both) but that's all. It's not a concern which pansy-slap she's hitting with.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Twinge: Finally, 99% of the more than 2000 games I've played occured before the shift to ranked matches. While my skill rank is relatively low (I played to the badge and then pretty much gave up on 3-card) I'm confident I've encountered players of all different skill levels (if not ranks). You claim that high skill rank matches are different from others but, I'm fairly certain the mechanics of the game remain the same. The difference between speed 7 and 5 at range still boils down to 8 moves: chi blast, dark chi blast, tiger frenzy, eye of the tiger, voidstreams, teleport, and ray of light. There are also many speed 7 moves that boomerang now equals but this is of dubious value as it has the potential to prevent Anex from attacking within her innate range. Regardless of skill rank, these are the moves affected by Anex's change in speed, if you think thats worth it then, by all means, valk your Anex.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
RamboBatman, there's no argument against Twinge's Anex/Valk points. 'Specially when you consider the energy costs involved. And assuming she's coming in at long. Higgy 'n' Insig's maybe the biggest threat. But, even if he hits his proc then he's dead in the water. If Anex switches, he's dead in the water. If he misses the proc, you've got two very large chunks missing from your character roster. (Please, no-one mention Pheobe). On the Ashi/Oni front I've got to disagree. Ashi/Valk has significantly more flex/threat than Oni/Anyitem. But, if you've only one valk then it should be on Anex. There's an argument can be made that Anex isn't broken at all: Valk Charm is.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
As for ashi vs. helene, I bring up the topic only because you claim that there can be no arguement made about Helene's quality, when I can make several. Helene has several viable moves in many situations whereas many characters considered superior have only one. VV for instance, is just Double-Slash on a stick, feast of blood is overcosted, ditto ray of light and radiance burst only has limited use as a bench killer (leaving the issue of 5-card tactics to another time). Ashi is similar, she will spend most of her time spamming bleeding slice, handle is a poor finisher despite its speed and power swing is only really useful in preventing pilebunker. Its true that Helene doesn't have a move as good as bleeding slice but, having multiple options makes her much less predictable which is of incalcuable value.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Twinge: The "drastically important" aspect of the anex vs. valk anex mirror is irrelevant. Anex can't use power toss but, it is simple to prevent valk anex from using hers. Anex is better than Cain without charm and the scarcity of Cain hardly makes schooling him an incentive for charm.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
anex is way too powerfull,she took out my andronema in 1 shot and killed both my battle axed and my trapped in 2 shots