Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Gnaw
Currently I have 114 wins and won 4 cards from playing. So simple caculation would give you about 3.5% of getting a card from winning a game, which is really low in my opinion :(
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
how about this for trading
there's already a "card shop" that you can buy cards from
just add a new function. you give them 2 cards, they let you pick one card. unscammable
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
really should add more cards,getting kinda bored of seeing the same thing over and over.Also increase the chance to win cards from a game if you make more cards cause you can bearly get the 46 unless you wait for challenges or buy them(which i dont think people would spend money for this game)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Traiding Doesn't Make much sense mainly cause it will take a While before any new cards do happen and before they are planned they (Jim and the others) still need ideas and suggestions...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
No trading! Then there would be people who create alternate accounts, pick starters, and trade em for good cards on their main account.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Just my opinion, but I think it would be a bit early for a trade system. There's only 46 cards and it's relatively simple to get more, be it waiting for a new challenge every week (actually, more like 3-4 days, but you get the point), winning them through battles (depends if you're lucky), or just spending money on them (if you're that desperate).
At this point, the only purpose I see for trading is to get different editions of a card.
Maybe when more cards are created (if that's actually going to happen) and there's a bit more reason for trading besides just different editions (aka. Card rarity), Trading would be more worthwhile.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I dont think trading would make a difference. Covi, thats an odd statement considering that if you trade you will have the same amount of cards, just a different amount. Besides you cant use the same card in the same deck.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Only newbs want trading because they are short of cards, if you could trade the game wouldn't be the same... besides who will trade (lets say), a blood vial for a phobe??? trading sistem would be silly.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It's funny. As a level 18 with 1100 wins and 200 losses: I usually win against people with high wins. (500-1500). Yet Sometimes I lose to Level 1's Lol.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
phobe against vannasa voss is a bad comb, vannasa has 10 light magic defence and her one atack rapis lashes does nothing.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
BUG REPORT: this is the second time that i have played a certain player whose handle is hulhu_666. first time i've played him, he was disconnected but i incurred the loss. 2nd time, i was unscathed and it was to be the the last move and he kept me waiting. no one was disconnected but nothing was happening on the screen either. i was not credited with the win!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Popo's to luck based...his or her poison chance,the miss rate of slingshot,weak physical defence means she/he needs to rely on dodging to survive them...the healing 25%...but hthere is somthing sure.IT PWNS RAWR TIME TO MEET YOU DOOM