Under rating threshold (hideshow)
5/5 and a favorite. Simple-minded people need a large mute button. Ttursas, your next game should be a giant mute button! :P
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ladridi, those guys were going to rate the game low anyway thus no cash prize for me no matter what. But yeah, it'd be better for me not to hang around here too much, I just personally go mad too easily when I read those trolls.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I love how some of these people expect the multitude of idiots, such as the ones below me, to rate this fairly. People are too simple minded obviously to rate in between one and five stars. ttursas don't worry about it, they're complaining because anything beyond an Idle or Toss The Turtle game is far from their comprehensive reach.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
did you not look at the Updates section awsomepunkdude? _"Press the SUBMIT buttons on the level pack selection screen to submit your scores. NEW: Added quality button, and ingame audio button. Tiny velocities (angular and linear) are now damped. And now you cannot drop the shape you are moving if the mouse pointer is on top of another shape (less room for exploits)."_ He did all of that while telling people to stfu. :P
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ttursas, I hope you didn't want the cash prize because your retaliatory comments are probably gonna hurt you in that regard. Folks that don't like the game aren't going to give a higher rating based on your comments, but those of us who do like it will reconsider based on what seems to be some amount of contempt for the reactions of some of the posters. I agree that some of the people are being punitive with the ratings but I have a lot more respect for a developer who responds politely to criticism, regardless of how inane he considers the criticism to be. Saving that, why not just ignore it?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It's the same way with the shapes. I did a level where I placed 6 shapes down before it stopped moving and only got 50 points instead of 300.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
tturesas there is a bug (i dont know if you can fix it) example, if you place a diamond and it still moves while you put an other one, you do not get points for the first one you puttet in, only the second
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
there is a mute button.... game is alright... its good i just dont like it.... (wasnt fan of the first) developer is a BITCH...... but other than that alright.... like it deserves 3.5/5.... but ppl are rating to bad so its like a 4.5/5 to offset
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
5/5 because iLiberate is annoying.
But seriously, this is a great game with a lot of effort, polish, and replay value. It's frustrating as hell, but in a "this takes thought" way.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I can't believe people are thinking the dev's annoying just because he had the courage to stand up to the idiots who misuse 1/5. That's reserved for pure and utter crud, as in the sort of stuff that doesn't even work, 2/5 is for games that work but lack depth or general fun, 3/5 is for games that are decent but still definitely need more, 4/5 is for games that are great but have some problems, and 5/5 is for the great games. This is NOT a 1/5 game by ANY means, and those rating it 1/5 for a lack of a mute button or friction definitely deserve the author's scolding.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
oh and as for complaining about the 1/5 voters, they are entitled to rate a game however they see fit, that is why kongregate has a rating system, if they don't like your game they CAN and WILL rate it 1/5 so stop whining.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I take that back.1/5 because of treating people like dirt vs. fixing your game.People rate games for jackass reasons,welcome to kongregate.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The lack of friction is a tad annoying, but also understandable since otherwise the game would be far too easy. Overall, I'd say it's a great sequel. And ttursas, thank you so much for standing up to the idiotic "1/5 no mute button" downraters. Whether or not it worked, you've earned yourself some definite respect from me. 5/5 and a fave. It's depressing knowing that some people prefer the pixel-perfection-requiring glitchy crud that pass for puzzle games these days.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
no, but as a developer he should take the comment's and the 1/5's as it is, criticism. there is no need to insult the players on this site. if you noticed what I said, it was a good game with flaws pointed out, his reaction to those flaws are what hurts developer's reputations
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I wish if you completed a level you skipped you'd either get that skip back or unlocked the next level in the line. IE if you skipped ten, 11 gets unlocked, and than you beat ten 12 would be unlocked, and you still wouldn't have the skip you used. Or you just got the skip back.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the developer's comments have a LOT to do with games, so anyone who says otherwise is dim, because if your players have suggestions it's meant to be constructive so don't talk down to them. so grow up.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Reapoer3742, my comments only lowered the score 0.02 points. It had already lost something like 0.10 points because of those "awesome and helpful 1/5 reviews"...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
also good job on standing up to the people who think that they are Kongregate critics finding any reason to rate the game nothing like that retard so long back who rated the game down because of the comments. RETARD!!!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think that this game would have been rated better if tturas had just keepen his mouth shut... so a word of addvice in the future.