Under rating threshold (hideshow)
What kind of crap is that? I magically don't have 'connection' and I lose the match because of it? The person was down to one more round and I was almost full health. This is only amazing if you've never played any other online CCG. This is crud in comparison.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
why'd you fix a game you made if people rate it 2 stars? apparantly it's not enjoyable. Why'd you flag a game, while it is posted by the developer? Why'd you flag for a bug, while there is a 'report a bug' icon? Why'd you downvote, while zanz will fix this bug once he has time, and no sooner, no matter what you do? Why would you repeat the same message over and over, while people didn't agree the 1st time, and you say nothing new?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
downvote the game to 1star and flag so that we get a quicker fix to the pvp make zanz prove the game is not a lost cause
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
What an awesome game... Normally I'm not the 'cardbattlegamekindaguy' but this one got me instantly. A big thumb up for the developer.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Yes, we understand that you're having PvP issues. Zanzariono is aware and will notify the community when a fix is released. Looks like it's donation time.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
after u play for about a week u wont need a log or discard pile u will pretty much know what card does what and what combo was used for what effect log couldnt hurt but would kinda be a waste of space,time an effort
on another not PvP is the heart of this game and it has been down for way too long, i still believe everyone should down vote and flag this game for being broken untill it is fixed
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
funevee: indeed, the game needs a log, or at least let you look in the discard pile. You could suggest this in the forums, too.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I love how you don't have to spend any real life money and I mean ANY! You also don't HAVE to come back every so often so you don't lose something or miss an event. (Unlike most online multiplayers) and it's pretty simple and easy to get the hang of.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game kinda is good but it sucks too. The worst thing is you can not see what big combo the computer used cause there is no see discord pile.So if you blink you really did miss something.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@ranava: Nobody likes someone who rates a game bad because they are bad at it. The game isn't easy for starters, ask for help in the chat. Or the forums. or hell, even in the comments if you must!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Well.. I've been playing for over an hour, and I have a negative score now. Don't know how I am supposed to get to 150 to finish that quest. No Achievement for me... Have fun with a 1 star.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Dream elements patch:
Shard of Freedom (Air Shard) nerfs
PVP fixed
----
Just that would improve the game so much, really.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It is estimated that approximately 1.4% of people who play Elements give it a rating lower than 5. It is estimated that approximately 1.4% of people who play Elements give it a rating they do not intend to give.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Um…has anyone else noticed that most of these creature cards show images of SPORE creations? You know, that evolution series by EA Games from 2008 or so? Not that there's anything wrong with that. I mean, they certainly look great compared to other creations I've seen in the past…oh, and I love the Tremors reference with the Graboids and Shriekers.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Hm this is actually the first time someone says that i lack expereicne. I have 6* all cards counting both rares and upped, I'm master of earth and a card curator. And when you say that just add a couple of shards and no rush deck will be able to beat you, you are wrong. I never said that a deck with rares have the same amount of counters to one with without but it's certainly more than 10 that you are implying. Furthermore I'm not mad at you, I'm just correcting your statement. See you around.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Can't you see that the number of decks with no rare cards that do well in PVP is objectively smaller than the number of decks with rare cards that do well in PVP? Or are you REALLY saying that rare cards are bad? Stop bringing shame on yourself
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@lugui01: Plat is not what decks should be focused around at all unless you are specifically trying to farm them. You dont' ever need to touch plat. Gods get you about the same amount of cash and dont' require nearly as many for half of there decks. And rares don't determine win rate in pvp. Ghostmare, for instance, gets fairly high win rate and doesn't have to use any. Super bows also don't need to use any can can do just fine. And ed does not lack experience in the least. And decks with rares do have just as many counters. Taking a little more thought doesn't mean they don't have plenty.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
omegareaper7: Better win rate in arena definitely. Try to farm platinum with no rare cards. And definitely a better win rate in PVP, but the PVP is really luck based (it depends on who you are playing against)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
edcedcedc you lack experience. I know that each deck has a counter, but it is a fact that GOOD decks with rare cards USUALLY have less possible counters than good decks with no rare cards. As example, a good deck with rare cards can be countered by only 10 decks while a good deck with no rare cards can be countered by 30. Rare cards have simply way too specific effects.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@lugui01: Better win rate against what? That really needs to be specified. In pvp, rares do not decide games. That is what the game is balanced around is pvp.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
actually, miracle is so slow that it's not frequently used in pvp2, it would easily get outrushed. Sosac is hard countered by purify, which is a common card. You seem to be confusing win rate with how these decks do against each other in pvp, something which isn't exactly the same. You might also want to consider not only win rate, but turns to win - even though a rush deck may have a lower winrate than pdials in say bronze or ai3, using the rush deck is still way more efficient.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
lugui01 For how long have you been playing this game? Your statement is false. Every deck got a counter. Even fully upped decks with rares can be countered by fully un upped without rares. Of course rares makes your deck better but just cause you have a miracle you dosen't win every single game vs non rares decks. It's actually quite the opposite when you got the rares you want you realize that they aren't as strong as you first thought. @iub3oir that was just a coincidence. Down voting this game won't result in another patch.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the last time tyrant was beating elements in score we got a major update so lets down vote this broken game till it is fixed
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You guys can say anything you want, it is a fact that good decks with rare cards have a better win rate than good decks with no rare cards. I mean, it doesn't matters how effective your rush deck is, if your opponent has a couple of miracles or SoSacs you won't stand a chance.