Games Achievements My Kong Sign In

Comments for Elements

« Back to Elements

qazzaq123

Nov. 26, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @jemels, My question is what would a Elements 2 have that's completely different from Elements also why cant these features just be added to the current game?

+ - !

(9)

deleteduser

Nov. 25, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-13)

Mojo9027

Nov. 25, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-4)

deleteduser

Nov. 25, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) Qazzaq, you do know that the calculator shows the Multiplication Sign, The Division Sign, the Addition Sign, and the Substraction sign in it. You also do know it shows number. If you don't know what the hell you're doing the math for, it is of no use.

+ - !

(4)

deleteduser

Nov. 25, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) come on guys they should make elements 2 because its so awesome right :)

+ - !

(-1)

deleteduser

Nov. 25, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) "i think pillars should be free." said my brother. what do you guys think?

+ - !

(4)

qazzaq123

Nov. 25, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @Dm1321, You do know that the tool shows you Number of cards, Cost, Ability Cost, Quanta Generation, and QI with digits by its side.

+ - !

(1)

deleteduser

Nov. 25, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) Because if you don't know the formula, you can't use the tool. It is of no use having a calculator if you don't know what are the numbers for.

+ - !

(2)

qazzaq123

Nov. 25, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @Dm1321, Instead of linking the topic from forums which that information is from why not link the Quantum Index Calculator Tool (http://elements.alanbeam.net/qi.php). :D

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Nov. 25, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) That's a poor explanation at best. It's useful, but if you're going to try to explain at least make it understandable. Last and not least, I highly suggest that it's simpler that you just link the place where you copied that out of - Because I know that comes from the Quanta Index theory.

+ - !

(3)

deleteduser

Nov. 24, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) Tips on deck building. pends counts as .5 if you have other marks but if you dont it is counted as 1(like a pillar) Card Cost+Card abilities=Cost/pillars=if it is 5.0-6.0 the pillar balance is fine.(except for mono aether) 6.0 above lacks pillars 5.0 below have too much pillars. also keep your deck size to 30 cards(except if your running a stupid stall) about immo rushes. dont use 6x photon(or etc) 6x immolation and 6x nova. use 5x photon(or etc) 5x immolation and 3 novas. balance the quantum costs for all elements.

+ - !

(-1)

deleteduser

Nov. 24, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) It's simple, really. If you're repeatedly starting the game without zero-cost cards, and want that to stop happening, throw in more zero-cost cards (or take out others to increase the ratio). They even arrange for that by allowing more than 6 of any pillar or pendulum.

+ - !

(0)

qazzaq123

Nov. 24, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @baracole, Tell me about it anyways I also rated him up because their wasn't anything he said that deserved a downrate.

+ - !

(2)

deleteduser

Nov. 24, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) Mulligan is a feature where, if you have no playable cards in your hand, you will get a re-draw. This is used in Elements so you always have some pillars when you start. Sometimes when commenting on a deck, people will say, for example "Nice deck, but Upped Sundials ruin mulligan." That is because pillars aren't the only 0-cost card - So essentially, you would have some times where you would have a dial. The mulligan only happens once, though, and as I said, it's automatic.

+ - !

(3)

deleteduser

Nov. 23, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) What is a mulligan?

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Nov. 23, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) this was one of the best games i have ever played thanks man for making it :)

+ - !

(9)

baracole

Nov. 23, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) I still don't understand why a comment from kentsdragon2, in which he thanks qazzaq123, should be rated down. But i guess i expect too much from my fellow elements players... I voted him up though.

+ - !

(5)

kentsdragon2

Nov. 23, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) thx

+ - !

(2)

qazzaq123

Nov. 22, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @kentsdragon2, You can not mulligan but the game does through a system which you can read more from here (http://elementscommunity.com/forum/index.php/topic,4066.0.html).

+ - !

(1)

kentsdragon2

Nov. 22, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-5)

qazzaq123

Nov. 22, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @Skolir, You do know that the mulligan system did work but it shuffled your deck X amount of times and still couldn't find any playable cards also yes this also happened to me.

+ - !

(0)

Skolir

Nov. 22, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-12)

deleteduser

Nov. 22, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) Multi-element decks rock my socks.

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Nov. 22, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) When we spin the wheel and 2 normals and an upgraded version (or any other combination ratio) of the same card pop up, I would love to see us get the un-upgraded version!

+ - !

(7)

deleteduser

Nov. 21, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @dragonboner454 it broke me 2...including when i was using a deck such as scaabs or otys....

+ - !

(0)

deleteduser

Nov. 21, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) Ask around and you'll get plenty of replies from the more well-known and I dare say, better players to this game, that Shrieker Rush (Or any rush) would be better to farm Bronze due to speed.

+ - !

(3)

dragonboner454

Nov. 20, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) havin tons of fun until i tried to seriously grind shards in bronze, mono aether is SO boring it just broke me couldn't even take it

+ - !

(2)

qazzaq123

Nov. 19, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @capomati, Yea HBs were just made be to easier then FGs and something different also the Level 3 decks are fixed. You can see their decks here (http://elementscommunity.com/forum/index.php/topic,17934.0.html).

+ - !

(5)

capomati

Nov. 19, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) Wow they really are random, maybe that´s why some of them really have weird cards in their decks xD But then why the AI3 have actually "good" decks and the AI4 just have random cards(+ all the other bonuses), just to make them somewhat different from FGs?

+ - !

(5)

qazzaq123

Nov. 19, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @capomati, Half-Blood decks are random and there's many upon many combinations, Try reading this to understand more, (http://elementscommunity.com/wiki/pve/half-blood/).

+ - !

(7)

capomati

Nov. 19, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) I know i will hate myself for this but, shouldn´t the Half-Blood decks be a bit more... hard? For example, why the one with time-dark uses dune scorpions knowing it will not have a chance to buff it? Most of them looks like just random cards from 2 elements + a few QT the only thing that actually makes them hard is the extra hp and some upgraded cards.

+ - !

(7)

LocoRoco23

Nov. 19, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-8)

qazzaq123

Nov. 19, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) Just wondering is anyone taking part in Forum Brawl! that's coming soon? (http://elementscommunity.com/forum/index.php/topic,33795.0.html)

+ - !

(2)

Ahwen

Nov. 18, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @ hilamtommy look hilam, that has nothing to do with this game, if u want to advertise a game, say it in chat, this is elements chat, we talk about elements here, although i spose there wouldnt b much point in u posting in that games comments.

+ - !

(1)

zander3346

Nov. 18, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) Great game, but it seems like the AI gets a lot of permanents on the first turn, don't you?

+ - !

(1)

someonepro

Nov. 18, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-19)

qazzaq123

Nov. 18, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-7)

deleteduser

Nov. 18, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-10)

deleteduser

Nov. 18, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @Qazzaq - I understand how you were "counter posting" someonepro, but you generalized it. You said "Players who watch the comment board and place a "+" only do so if the comment posted is sensible." That means that Ahwen wasn't sensible. Once you make a generalization, you aren't exactly counter-posting a single person anymore, you're counter-posting everyone locked in your generalization - In which case, everyone in Elements Comments Page with a negative Rating on their comment.

+ - !

(6)

therakau

Nov. 17, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-10)

qazzaq123

Nov. 17, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-4)

deleteduser

Nov. 17, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @Qazzaq - So a player like Ahwen saying "Sorry" and "Thanks" isn't a sensible comment? Good news everyone, let's just stop being nice here.

+ - !

(9)

qazzaq123

Nov. 17, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @someonepro, Let me place a few words in, Players who watch the comments board and place a "+" only do so if the comment posted is sensible.

+ - !

(5)

someonepro

Nov. 17, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-19)

Kingoslavios

Nov. 17, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) great game, i'd like a rematch feature in the multiplayer though

+ - !

(5)

qazzaq123

Nov. 17, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @Ahwen, This is what I do not understand, You post a comment but know nothing of whats the main theme of that comment about. Before post "its actually 100'/. impossible to win with a stall against a fg" You should have used many different stall decks and tested it on False Gods. Looks like you must observe your False Gods more and know abit more of different types of decks.

+ - !

(3)

Ahwen

Nov. 17, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) thanks omeg, i havent fought them much so i wouldnt know, guess i just wasnt observant enough, bsides, ive only fought like one or two.

+ - !

(1)

deleteduser

Nov. 17, 2011

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-7)

deleteduser

Nov. 17, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @Ahwen Because it's impossible to count backwards from a number greater than 60

+ - !

(0)

omegareaper7

Nov. 16, 2011

Under rating threshold (show) @Ahwen: Its not impossible in the slightest, they all have double draw, and some have hourglasses/precog.

+ - !

(3)

  • add a comment
Developers Players Support YouTube TikTok X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Join the conversation Join Discord
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Code of Conduct
© 2026 Kongregate