Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Sinyor, calindu is right, and you exploited it too, that's why you try to find weak excuses. And if I am right, you should get banned too.(yeah +10 games)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@qazzaq123: Do you think Zanz cares much about those noobs that exploit the bugs? No, he will ban them in a flash. @SinyoR: The amount of money Zanz gets from people that used that bug is too little, Elements is a hobby for him, and he doesn't care much about 1-2$ per month. Game difficult? That's why I always try to help newbies that want to play fair, giving them deck advice and pointing them to best decks for different situations. But really, people that should be banned are those who really exploit it(+10 games) as I said.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Calindu when will you understand that banning is fcking stupid and not fair ?? I guess the biggest thing zanz will do is delete the money or anything. This game is very difficult for newbies anyway and the exploit thingy would make the game easier for new people. Nothing against you ^^
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@calindu, I don't think Zanzarino will even personally ban anyone. Sure if you exploit a bug you should be ban but do the developers care to ban nowadays? It's not like the players caused the problem.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Apparently, by the same glitch, by quitting two pvp games I couldn't do anything in, my score dropped from a little over 100 to -40, and my deck level is back to level 0! What's going on?!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I encountered a strange glitch where, in my first ever pvp game, all my cards were blank, had no quanta marks, and couldn't be played.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Can't wait for the next Kongregate tournament. If one doesn't get set up soon (Like, in the next week) I'll be setting one up myself. :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Zzzip50: Did you read what I said? If they use it constantly and win w/o doing anything then they are exploiting the bug, which gets you a ban in any game. @qazzaq123: Seems like you didn't understood what I said, reread again.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@newo, pvp1 fee is now 30, and pvp2 fee is 50, they changed that on the main site, but it seems they didn't change it here, and all people should read the rules, so we won't have this dispute again: http://www.elementsthegame.com/rules.html
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Could you please add in card names next to the pictures for the bonus spinner after a round of the PVP arena?
Maybe some people can see the difference between purplish-blue and bluish-purple, but others have vision issues that make many of the shards look the same.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@calindu, Of course those clearly seen exploiting the bug should be ban but not those who are accessing PvP1 which has no clue what's happening. @Zzzip50, Zanzarino doesn't have the rules on Kongregate but only on the official site and that's my point, How would one know the rules of the game if it's not on the site which players play on? Zanzarino should add it here.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Well everyone who is in chat knows it for sure. And everyone who encounter an bug in the game would check what it is first before using it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@qazzaq123: It's not hard to understand that when you get a free EM w/o doing anything and do this more than 5 times you are abusing the bugs, and abusing the bugs gets you a ban in any game. I don't say banning those that played less than 5 games, but when you played over 10 you should be banned(some guy played over 850 games in this way, he shouldn't get banned?)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@calindu, Here's my point, The rules are not display on Kongregate but on the official site for the game. We play on Kongregate and not over there so most of us have never seen those rules/know about it. Zanzarino can not ban players if the player themselves entered PvP1 without knowing about the problems PvP is causing. He already has a low player base + A inactive official forums, If he wishes to ban all those that played in PvP1 then he will be the one lossing out on activity. If Zanzarino still cares about this game greatly he would fix the problem asap but I do agree that if players know about the PvP problem then they shouldn't be taking part = Pure respect to the game + developer.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@SinyoR: It's stated in rules, what you can't understand, really. If you can't respect those you should pay for this and get banned, simple. Zanz is the only developer here, show him some respect for his work done to this game and don't use a exploit, the advantage you may get is too little. I know, you found a bug that finally allows you to be good and you are having fun with it, but is just not fair.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Zanzarino bans anyone he wants to ban ? Thats stupid. There are a lot of players who invested a lot of time in this game and just because there is a damn glitch there is no right to ban people ! Like I said before he should only delete the money players got from there.. I didnt see the rules im sorry for that. And yup cal I think the same way ( ur last sentence ).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@SinyoR: That's stupid, is stated in rules, what you don't understand? If Zanzarino wants to ban anyone he will do it, the game is free, nothing can stop him to do it...~"If only people with closed minds came with closed mouths"
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Um well it is not the players fault that there is a glitch.. so they should be allowed to use that like pvp 1. There is no right to ban ppl who use it. I would say that they only have the right to delete the money players got from there.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@qazzaq123: You probably don't know what happened, those guys should and will probably be banned, they are abusing the PvP1 bug, which is illegal as stated here: http://www.elementsthegame.com/rules.html (point 5)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Something I noticed on the Only the Beginning badge: Yo dawg. I heard you like quests, so I put quests in your quest so you can complete quests while you complete your quest.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
What pain222 said, but if there's a bug that means Zanz played with the game coding, so this means he still cares about Elements \o/
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
A summary bar (eg at the bottom) which lists the last actions of each player would be nice, so you can review the effects that have taken place. With all the random stuff from Aether going so quick it's often hard to see what effect actually happened.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@takezoido, Yup one win vs platinum can make up for so many losses plus less rings to have a chance to a upgraded rare card.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@ShizuYuki: Bronze gives low score indeed, but go to play, you win way more, for example, a 500 hp EM against anyone outside of top 10 is over 1000 electrum.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
actually there is a way. bronze arena has only up to 20 points, causing them to choose between some hp bonus or upped cards. silver arena goes up to lv 40, meaning you will face decks with upped cards and some hp. and it goes on like this. this means that bronze league is weak, and gives u low score improvement, but plat gives u a nice boost on score when u win.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Arena win gets a few points added to your score, not bad I guess. But lose once and you lose way more than you'd gain. Yet you have no real way to know whether you'll face someone around your strength or someone with 100+ wins and 150 health with rare cards. >.<