Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@magicwiz532 forget about the whole trading rares thing...besides you won't have any use for the rares now but you might later on in the game :P
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Ahwen, I heard that a recycle mechanic wouldn't happen and that's why I never submitted my card ideas that's in Kongregate collabs. :D Example (http://www.kongregate.com/collabs/art/qazzaq123/creation) However note that all the cards are pretty old and needs to be modified as their kinda on the OP side and should be randomly place into your deck and not hand. :P I will work on them soon with more card submissions. :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
y-know what'd be cool? a shard that allows you to recover cards you've played. like jjust, reshuffle them into ur deck.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Just tried PVP and this isn't exactly nooby friendly. Hard to find a pvp match without upgraded cards. I always get negotiated to no restrictions. And once you hit that one point. Your score just skyrockets. You don't grind for too long. And thanks qazzaq123 :) And also, game needs updating. Just realized PVP 1 = 30 and PVP 2 = 50 on the main site.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Grr. Only won once out of the card slot machine. I would say it's rigged but that would only be a sad excuse from me. I just have oh.. shitty luck ^^
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Hi everyone just wondering if you would give my topic some feedback on what you think, (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,40409.84.html).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@ChickenMayBite: Maybe you don't play competitive PvP but some of us do, and deck-out is one of the strategy that really works, making 30 cards decks last more it's not good, considering how many 35 cards stalls are here(naming only the best one: Firestall)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ldadsfx, it is actually luck really, although the amount of hits-to-attacks should average out to the amount displayed on the card. They seem useless at times and invincible at others. It's all luck.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think that they could make you use the rest of your hand each turn after the cards you have run out. Like let's say you have 0 cards in your deck and 4 cards in your hand. The games makes you play or discard a card each turn. So you can last up to 8 or so turns after you deck out.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Makes no sense talking about a system that wouldn't be implemented as said so by the developer of their not being one.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
No, the reason trading would be bad is that people who have played for a long time get more than 12 of rares, and would give them away to everyone, making them common.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@pillyko the reason your comment got disliked so much, was becaus say you got a rare weapon (i got the titan) and you were a n00b, a pro would trade it for something and say "oh it's not too good" if they were mean, of corse but it could still happen
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@NSB13 What don't you understand about the fact that you CAN use 2 novas.... You CAN'T use 2 Super Novas. But you clearly haven't made it to the upgrading portion of the game if you didn't know that.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@NSB13 Are you dumb or what? novas are allowed to be played 2 times in a single turn...SUPER NOVAS are the ones which you cant use 2 times on the same turn...got it?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Re: AI being allowed to use 2 novas in a turn: Why can't the AI play by the same rules? The only difference between a player and the AI should be their strategy. It's one thing for False Gods to have innate advantages, but quite another for the rules to be asymmetric. (I already know that this comment will be heavily down-voted due to the slightest criticism, but maybe the dev team will see it before it does.)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
-.- this deck was based of chaos seed and i was using SoR SoPa steam machines and then the funniest thing happened...every single chaos seed PUed my steam machines...lets see the 20/14 one and the 14/10 one...i think im screwed now..cause they are SoRed :P
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Phillyko Trading would not be a good idea, at first I thought it was but there are many flaws. Suppose you play in many different accounts, or your friend has an unused account with many cards. You can get whatever you need without working for it. Or the other accounts get a card and trade it with your main account. It makes things way too easy and it lets you get cards without working hard for them. And you can get an almost infinate amount of electrum by trading any won cards in any account and selling it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@fatman779, CPU or Player, doesn't make much of a difference. Just because its an AI now doesn't mean that the draws are better. So player or computer they would have gotten the same cards too beat you.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i HATE the cpu that it puts u against when a player leaves during pvp. its like AMAZING. i can be up by 50 points and set to win and still end up losing cuz the cpu it puts u against is so good
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Any chance of preventing people from accidentally skipping their spins after a win? I don't do a much any more (but still do from time to time - like just now).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@calindu i'm happy to get the nymph but not so happy to lose to miracle when 2 cards were left in my deck and the card i needed was my last SoR but for some reason the next card i got was the turquoise nymph :P
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
zanz decided that life had a monopoly on elemental mastery vicories, and so made it so they couldnt get one like that. but now dark has a monopoly on EM victories...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Calindu To be fair, the game was like that at one point. I forget when or why it was changed, but I'm sure there was some balance reasoning behind it somewhere. Either that or Zanz thought EM'ing was too easy.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@victor3112, I don't see a 2 vs 2 pvp duel feature coming anytime based on the game having pvp glitches happening from 1 vs 1 pvp duels.