Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Argh. Hackers finally found out about this game, my last seven matches have been against someone who magically gains seventy quantums in every area at the beginning of the turn, then blasts me with firebolts.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ok thats ridiculous, take away miracle from the fake gods, they already have 200 hp and fully upgraded health, thats not fair to make it almsot 400 hp, you are stupid if you keep it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
RE zphantom13:
if upgrades were that cheap all the new people when trying to pvp would get beaten so badly they will just give up.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
upgrades should cost: lvl 1 cards: intant efect, shields and creatures with 2/2 should cost 50 or 100 lvl 2 cards:, weapons and creatures up to 5/5 costs 200 or 150 lvl 3 cards:powerful stuff should cost 300-500
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
FOR THE PEOPLE THAT DO NOT KNOW HOW TO UPGRADE THEIR CARDS YOU MUST COMPLETE ALL QUESTS the last is one that you must achieve a score of 500 after that you get to choose 1 rare elemental weapon to keep for free also it allows the option of fighting fake gods (lvl6) then last but certainly not least you can UPGRADE CARDS for 1500 electrum coins (so save up)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
True, the upgrades ARE costly, but once you've upgraded all your best cards, what else are you going to spend money on?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Creature, while i agree, the point is for people who dont have anything to buy to actually get something, witohut upgrades you would just stock pile coins forever.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Upgrades are way, WAY too costy. At the very least, weaker cards should cost, say, 500 to upgrade. Because no one's going to spend 1500 just so a card costs one less mana to use, or gains a single attack point. It's rediculous.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Lets put it this way, what represents the "fire" element to you? Death? I'm pretty positive you wont think of "fish" for "fire" or "diamond" or "death" . It's a small universe, here.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Hellfox: Then enjoy the game and disregard the comments you don't care about?
@banshee96: No, it won't be taken down because of MTG. Major companies have bigger fish to fry.
If Zanz or anyone else have anything to add they can message me in private.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@zanzarino: At least show the correct symbol. The symbol in your pic is the one you use for pillars. Anyone playing feel free to check the symbol on any weapon or shield and see how it compares. It's the same except for how you extended the vertical lines.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
good game , i love it, and trav jus give it up and shush, hes givin an awesome online game and its free and ur accusing him of something,yeeesh
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
http://www.elementsthegame.com/permanents.jpg
Quote:
"The shape of your legends symbol is exactly the same as the MTG symbol"
See it for yourself.
And I am not going to waste any more time on this, please DO contact: EA games, maxism, MTG, Pepsi (I used a sphere!!!), Yu Ghi Oh, and any other company that used anything that resembles a pillar, a skull, an infinity symbol or crated any game card before me... oooh also Corel Draw and Adobe, I used their textures, fonts etc.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@zanzarino: My avatar isn't even a Hershey's kiss; it's a metal slime. Obviously it's fine to use, as it follows the Fair Use criteria. Your game does not. Example - it would not be okay to use the metal slime artwork in a game I make.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@zanzarino: "symbols and geometrical shapes" are not exactly what you are getting out of Spore. It is supplying the textures, templates, etc,..(basically doing the work). The shape of your legends symbol is exactly the same as the MTG symbol. You clearly did nothing except change the color. MTG mana/tap symbols are copyrighted, but I'm not certain if their set symbols are. Regardless, Atari & WOTC aren't likely to bother suing you unless there is more money involved. I just think that's a cheap way to develop a game and pointed it out.