|
|
metadata
Pocket Politics was a great game that was neglected by it's developers, arguably.
Their sequel is a game that is totally not like the original, to include the fact that it's not an idle game and increases the reality that you have to pay to win, really...
I'm pretty disappointed.
|
|
|
metadata
Yea, I agree. Sad when they make a game that is so clearly P2W. Had a guy just kill me at the end of the event. I thought I would try the subscription but after that I cancelled it. Very sad from a human perspective that people spend money to win at a game like this too...lol
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[SeanB660](/forums/1069120/topics/1922240?page=1#13530525):**_
> Yea, I agree. Sad when they make a game that is so clearly P2W. Had a guy just kill me at the end of the event. I thought I would try the subscription but after that I cancelled it. Very sad from a human perspective that people spend money to win at a game like this too...lol
I wouldn't mind the $8 a month if the entire thing wasn't set up so awfully.
Maybe I'm just missing something but it doesn't seem to me that the game was very well thought out, and if it was, it was thought out for ridiculous money spending and not actual game related strategy, etc.
I'll plug along for the time being, the original was great and a lotta people complained about p2w but I didn't spend money and could rank high.
Maybe I'm wrong but I'm certainly not impressed this far.
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[Davegarland](/forums/1069120/topics/1922240?page=1#13530834):**_
> > _Originally posted by **[SeanB660](/forums/1069120/topics/1922240?page=1#13530525):**_
> > Yea, I agree. Sad when they make a game that is so clearly P2W. Had a guy just kill me at the end of the event. I thought I would try the subscription but after that I cancelled it. Very sad from a human perspective that people spend money to win at a game like this too...lol
>
> I wouldn't mind the $8 a month if the entire thing wasn't set up so awfully.
> Maybe I'm just missing something but it doesn't seem to me that the game was very well thought out, and if it was, it was thought out for ridiculous money spending and not actual game related strategy, etc.
> I'll plug along for the time being, the original was great and a lotta people complained about p2w but I didn't spend money and could rank high.
> Maybe I'm wrong but I'm certainly not impressed this far.
I agree. I also never spent on original and ranked ok too but I honestly just aimed for lvl 50 and if I went higher fine but I didn’t really try after 50.
|
 "Davegarland"){kind=small}
 "SeanB660"){kind=small}