|
|
metadata
Sometimes you start a tourney and realize, a bit late, that you made a hash of your draft.
It would be nice to get a mulligan, pay 10 gems, or whatever discount price devs deem suitable, and get a do over on fraft and tourney
Seems fairly easy to implement too.
|
|
|
metadata
good idea mspil, I'll put it on the list.
|
|
|
metadata
If this happens before you are able to enter the tourney and see other players' decks I agree it's a good idea. If not, it would be a way to scout other player's decks and then build a counter, which is sort of exploity. It's a great idea at the core though so I'm sure we could come up with a good way to implement it.
|
|
|
metadata
Unless you are allowed to do the whole tourney before the mulligan AND others all have decks with an obvious hard counter I doubt you could gain enough to be an exploit
Thanks for the response btw, woud be nice to see this.
|
|
|
metadata
With rare coins you really only need a handful of known decks you can counter, so I agree with Sir_V. As for realizing you've goofed up before battling and wanting to start over, I think the already proposed idea of being able to select all the cards for your army at the same time will help with that issue. So I'd like to see how that goes before trying something like this.
|
|
|
metadata
We all could exploit the decks anyway in kongchat. Only thing to really counter is which hero might be better. As we draft we are stuck at the hands of rng and sometimes it's really bad compared to what other's got lucky with. So I see no problem with mulligans.
|
|
|
metadata
I think it is a GREAT IDEA. Why would those poor and noobs (that are struggling to get a decent deck) had any chance against experienced, and gem covered people had any hopes of winning, just not fair to the big players. Imagine some top player that have a lot of gems, pays 10 gems for the tourney, get a bad deck. And some noob that also pays 10 gems, (which is more than he can afford) with better deck kills him. That would be a disaster. I suggest we bring a new rule. 20 gems for the tourney, you get 5 battles, another 20 gems for 5 more. Epic reward is of course at 50 wins. DO you see where I am going with this? Are you going to close this game just for 50 ppl (and their alts)? The only good thing in this game was this tourney, we are all equal. Do you really think someone ranked 100 to 200 is going to pay for this, when he knows that someone strong payed again to make him stronger? Think again, but yes it is a GREAT IDEA. XD Idiots
|
|
|
metadata
Even if you reroll, 18 gems is less than what you can win every day just by doing the Kolizeum. In Heartstone, the cost is higher than the average gain with quests.
|
|
|
metadata
Thought it would be good, enter tourney and find out its useless. Another tourney with 19 wins. Mulligan 1 match for 1 gem max 3 times would of been better
|
 "mspil"){kind=small}
 "stormwars"){kind=small}
 "Sir_Valimont"){kind=icon}
 "Cat8urglar"){kind=small}
 "Ez4U2Killme"){kind=small}
 "mfakr82"){kind=small}
 "Tsua"){kind=small}
 "Jayman76"){kind=small}