|
|
metadata
Build a combo-specific deck for extra buffs and compete for rewards during our Anniversary Clash. This event will start on 10/07/19 at 18:00 GMT and will end on 10/11/19 at 18:00 GMT.
**All recipes, rarities, and Power Card versions of the combos below will receive a 100% boost to Attack, Health, and all Skills. **
* Swole Joe
* Swole Francine
* Party All The Time
* Party Crashers
* Dance Party Bobby
* Luanne’s 21st Birthday
* Hangover Nightmare
* Celebeartions
* Party Board
* Cute Witch of the North
The mythic ranked reward will be **Hypnotoad!**
Remember, Clash Events have a few extra rules and are only available to players that are currently in or have previously reached Secret Fight Club rank in Arena.
For more information about Clash events, check out this [FAQ article](https://animationthrowdown.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360020720511-Clash-Events).
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
yeuy another clash, not the one i hoped for but clash is clash :)
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[fvanluchene](/forums/727066/topics/1863937?page=1#13248087)**:*
> yeuy another clash, not the one i hoped for but clash is clash :)
My thought exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
Please stop ignoring disguised and add a mythic object card for it. Those of us who bought into disguised are very neglected :-(.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
This clash wasnt even long ago AT ALL, why not some variety????
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[GosuHost](/forums/726779/topics/1863937?page=1#13248133):**_
> This clash wasnt even long ago AT ALL, why not some variety????
Well, it’s either wait until next year for this exact clash, or have it 2 or 3 times as they have other clashes. I feel like every clash has been active twice now, and most are seasonal. Winter clash, Summer, Spring, Earth, Memorial, Anniversary, Oktoberfest... we also have clash more often now so it should be expected they will repeat at least once for everyone who had good decks for it. Having each one twice within a month will push people to spend for them too, let’s not forget that.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
All I see in clash now is people playing with the lv 3 cm only seen 1 orn2 clash decks the entire time
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[KenA136](/forums/727066/topics/1863937?page=1#13248900)**:*
> All I see in clash now is people playing with the lv 3 cm only seen 1 orn2 clash decks the entire time
When your opponent is picked, it takes the last deck they won an arena match with. So it's not surprising that you don't see clash decks facing you... when you do, it's someone trying to slow people down in clash.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
I have been playing this game since June 2017. I don't/can't pay to play. I have none of these combos
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
I'm just curious but even with a clash card thrown off the start, how does anyone even have a chance against 100+ total first attack from the opponent? I lost 5 today because of the insane total first attack against me. Cm2&3. These events are really pointless unless you are a top 100 player. It's a joke
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
Hoow many matches in total are in a Clash event, 24 or 30?
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[2platdiamond2](/forums/726779/topics/1863937?page=1#13249122):**_
> I'm just curious but even with a clash card thrown off the start, how does anyone even have a chance against 100+ total first attack from the opponent? I lost 5 today because of the insane total first attack against me. Cm2&3. These events are really pointless unless you are a top 100 player. It's a joke
This^
Also. Fix the clash matching system. . . There is no way EVER that as my first match in the day, (starting at anywhere from 500-1500) that I should be facing the top 100 guys(especially after they've already played their matches). Maybe number 450- but shouldn't it be someone in my own ranked tier until I move up in rank?
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[travisleeccain](/forums/727066/topics/1863937?page=1#13250300)**:*
> > _Originally posted by **[2platdiamond2](/forums/726779/topics/1863937?page=1#13249122):**_
> > I'm just curious but even with a clash card thrown off the start, how does anyone even have a chance against 100+ total first attack from the opponent? I lost 5 today because of the insane total first attack against me. Cm2&3. These events are really pointless unless you are a top 100 player. It's a joke
>
>
>
> This^
> Also. Fix the clash matching system. . . There is no way EVER that as my first match in the day, (starting at anywhere from 500-1500) that I should be facing the top 100 guys(especially after they've already played their matches). Maybe number 450- but shouldn't it be someone in my own ranked tier until I move up in rank?
500-1500 what? Clash rank? That has nothing to do with matching.
Clash matching is done via SFC ranking. If you are at Level 20, you get matched with someone in SFC 2000. If you are at Level 22, you get matched with someone in SFC 2200.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[mfruity](/forums/726779/topics/1863937?page=1#13250315):**_
> 500-1500 what? Clash rank? That has nothing to do with matching.
>
> Clash matching is done via SFC ranking. If you are at Level 20, you get matched with someone in SFC 2000. If you are at Level 22, you get matched with someone in SFC 2200.
>
>
My bad, I should have stated that I'm aware of how clash ranking **already** works. What I'm trying to get at is that system is obviously broken- which is why I state now, that it needs fixed- here is what I believe the issue to be.
Soo many players purposely drop rank specifically to block lower players from climbing higher ranks in SFC( fighting way below their skill or wallet level). This IN TURN makes it so only x amount of players can even reach into the top ranks to begin with, because they can only climb so high in SFC anyway. This means those players will never be higher in the ranks in clash because they aren't capaple of fighting these people in arena (so how would they possibly beat them in clash?)
INSTEAD both the clash rank and SFC rank should be taken into consideration, to make an adjusting scale of more equal fights. I believe this would not only eliminate the majority of the one-shots and CM2/3 PC use, but also cause more players to strive to actually build a clash deck-
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[travisleeccain](/forums/727066/topics/1863937?page=1#13250344)**:*
> My bad, I should have stated that I'm aware of how clash ranking **already** works. What I'm trying to get at is that system is obviously broken- which is why I state now, that it needs fixed- here is what I believe the issue to be.
> Soo many players purposely drop rank specifically to block lower players from climbing higher ranks in SFC( fighting way below their skill or wallet level). This IN TURN makes it so only x amount of players can even reach into the top ranks to begin with, because they can only climb so high in SFC anyway. This means those players will never be higher in the ranks in clash because they aren't capaple of fighting these people in arena (so how would they possibly beat them in clash?)
> INSTEAD both the clash rank and SFC rank should be taken into consideration, to make an adjusting scale of more equal fights. I believe this would not only eliminate the majority of the one-shots and CM2/3 PC use, but also cause more players to strive to actually build a clash deck-
>
I disagree. Clash incentivizes players to climb in SFC. Virtually everyone who is Top 1000 start at SFC 1950 or higher. That's one thing that Kong got right.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[MrMaestro33](/forums/727066/topics/1863937?page=1#13248162)**:*
> > _Originally posted by **[GosuHost](/forums/726779/topics/1863937?page=1#13248133):**_
> > This clash wasnt even long ago AT ALL, why not some variety????
>
> Well, it’s either wait until next year for this exact clash, or have it 2 or 3 times as they have other clashes. I feel like every clash has been active twice now, and most are seasonal. Winter clash, Summer, Spring, Earth, Memorial, Anniversary, Oktoberfest... we also have clash more often now so it should be expected they will repeat at least once for everyone who had good decks for it. Having each one twice within a month will push people to spend for them too, let’s not forget that.
Meg clash, fathers day clash, etc have not been done twice. lets not forget about that. Theres plenty of clashes that wasnt just 2 clashes ago they could have done
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
I like the clashes so close together. Give greater chance to obtain quads with the tier box without breaking the bank! Helps low spenders stay a bit more competitive
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[mfruity](/forums/726779/topics/1863937?page=1#13250390):**_
> > *Originally posted by **[travisleeccain](/forums/727066/topics/1863937?page=1#13250344)**:*
>
> > My bad, I should have stated that I'm aware of how clash ranking **already** works. What I'm trying to get at is that system is obviously broken- which is why I state now, that it needs fixed- here is what I believe the issue to be.
> > Soo many players purposely drop rank specifically to block lower players from climbing higher ranks in SFC( fighting way below their skill or wallet level). This IN TURN makes it so only x amount of players can even reach into the top ranks to begin with, because they can only climb so high in SFC anyway. This means those players will never be higher in the ranks in clash because they aren't capaple of fighting these people in arena (so how would they possibly beat them in clash?)
> > INSTEAD both the clash rank and SFC rank should be taken into consideration, to make an adjusting scale of more equal fights. I believe this would not only eliminate the majority of the one-shots and CM2/3 PC use, but also cause more players to strive to actually build a clash deck-
> >
>
> I disagree. Clash incentivizes players to climb in SFC. Virtually everyone who is Top 1000 start at SFC 1950 or higher. That's one thing that Kong got right.
>
So what you're saying is, it's okay for clash rank #2 to fight clash rank 1300 because we're both at level 24 in clash, even though my standard crown points sit average about 2000 and theirs sit at about 2400? That's absolutely absurd, and **Absolutely not okay.** As stated before. It's broken and needs fixin
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[travisleeccain](/forums/727066/topics/1863937?page=1#13250483)**:*
>
> So what you're saying is, it's okay for clash rank #2 to fight clash rank 1300 because we're both at level 24 in clash, even though my standard crown points sit average about 2000 and theirs sit at about 2400? That's absolutely absurd, and **Absolutely not okay.** As stated before. It's broken and needs fixin
Sure. Everyone who's at Level 24 has the same pool of potential opponents. Why should it be easier for someone with a worse deck? What's the point of improving your deck if that's the case?
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[mfruity](/forums/726779/topics/1863937?page=1#13250495):**_
> > *Originally posted by **[travisleeccain](/forums/727066/topics/1863937?page=1#13250483)**:*
> >
> > So what you're saying is, it's okay for clash rank #2 to fight clash rank 1300 because we're both at level 24 in clash, even though my standard crown points sit average about 2000 and theirs sit at about 2400? That's absolutely absurd, and **Absolutely not okay.** As stated before. It's broken and needs fixin
>
> Sure. Everyone who's at Level 24 has the same pool of potential opponents. Why should it be easier for someone with a worse deck? What's the point of improving your deck if that's the case?
>
>
>
To that same note- what's the point of the instant loss against the top ranked guy? It's not about ease, it's about fairness? Top tier vs top tier? To your earlier point, it would still be mostly the same top 1000 guys 1950+ but at the very least the top 100 should only be facing the top 200 guys and the bottom end of that top 1000 should only be facing the bottom end of the top 1000 until they rank up. . . You don't send a saibaman to fight Goku, you send Vegeta
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[travisleeccain](/forums/727066/topics/1863937?page=1#13250508)**:*
> > _Originally posted by **[mfruity](/forums/726779/topics/1863937?page=1#13250495):**_
> > > *Originally posted by **[travisleeccain](/forums/727066/topics/1863937?page=1#13250483)**:*
> > >
> > > So what you're saying is, it's okay for clash rank #2 to fight clash rank 1300 because we're both at level 24 in clash, even though my standard crown points sit average about 2000 and theirs sit at about 2400? That's absolutely absurd, and **Absolutely not okay.** As stated before. It's broken and needs fixin
> >
> > Sure. Everyone who's at Level 24 has the same pool of potential opponents. Why should it be easier for someone with a worse deck? What's the point of improving your deck if that's the case?
> >
> >
> >
>
> To that same note- what's the point of the instant loss against the top ranked guy? It's not about ease, it's about fairness? Top tier vs top tier? To your earlier point, it would still be mostly the same top 1000 guys 1950+ but at the very least the top 100 should only be facing the top 200 guys and the bottom end of that top 1000 should only be facing the bottom end of the top 1000 until they rank up. . . You don't send a saibaman to fight Goku, you send Vegeta
Yes, it's about fairness. If you are at Level 24 and you can't beat the same pool of opponents as everyone else, you don't deserve to advance to Level 25.
|
 "BeardedOrange"){kind=small}
 "fvanluchene"){kind=small}
 "Groundlessfears"){kind=small}
 "BradA184"){kind=small}
 "GosuHost"){kind=small}
 "MrMaestro33"){kind=small}
 "me3said2"){kind=small}
 "KenA136"){kind=small}
 "harrisjoshua84"){kind=small}
 "Kallark2"){kind=small}
 "AmyS372"){kind=small}
 "2platdiamond2"){kind=small}
 "Bibeth"){kind=small}
 "daltani20022"){kind=small}
 "travisleeccain"){kind=small}
 "mfruity"){kind=small}
 "stugates"){kind=small}