|
|
metadata
Why even give a break between the event. just start the next one afterthe previous one ends. event was fun when every few weeks and only a few days long. Now it is basically a daily quest and boring.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
What a miserable bunch of people.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
Nice....
woohooo....
excitement...
...can't await the start...
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
This is ridiculous and boring. GIVE US SOMETHING NEW.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
The card master challenges are getting old. Nowadays I only make an effort to compete perhaps once every four challenges.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
if you haven't hoarded it's the only way to compete now.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[JeremyC1426](/forums/727066/topics/1909809?page=1#13389675)**:*
>
> I am not upset about anyone who spends ridiculous amounts of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ on this game. More upset that Kongregate made $200,000 in the month of April alone while this pandemic was going on and showed no support for its members of AT and this was just what they made from the AT community. This is the first sign of a dying game, no new content and trying to get as much money from it player base as possible before they announce it.
From where do you get that number? Is there a link that verifies that Kong earned $200,000 in April from AT?
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[Banerang](/forums/727066/topics/1909809?page=1#13389682)**:*
> **These are getting boring and problematic. Just like the other ones like "Future Cop" or "Grill Battle", these are becoming less fun for the F2P. I can't compete with the top 10 because they toss their cash into it and not skill. So yeah, lame.**
I think that a longer running ECMCs is beneficial for an f2p player compared to a short ECMC. Just by consistently playing, an f2p player will rank higher during a long challenge than during a short one if the frequency of the challenge is the same, e.g. one challenge per month. The p2w players will spend their money regardless, no matter if the challenge is short or long.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
This post requires Administrator review before it can be successfully posted. Thank you for your patience and understanding!
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> I think that a longer running ECMCs is beneficial for an f2p player compared to a short ECMC. Just by consistently playing, an f2p player will rank higher during a long challenge than during a short one if the frequency of the challenge is the same, e.g. one challenge per month. The p2w players will spend their money regardless, no matter if the challenge is short or long.
I can't follow that logic. Longer challenge means paying players get more opportunity to outrun free players by just their usual spending. This also leads to much higher end results which are extremely hard to reach with just some hoarded stuff. You could try at least, but the risk is very high to just waste your stuff without a worthwhile effect.
My experience is the exact opposite of your statement. With shorter challenges I was able to rank at least top 20 and depending on the group top 10 was possible as well. Since the longer runtime I'm at about 30 most of the time, could go for top 20 by burning through hoards, but that's it.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[gimmereward](/forums/726779/topics/1909809?page=2#13389905):**_
> What a miserable bunch of people.
Who?
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[tom_tomtom](/forums/726779/topics/1909809?page=2#13390522):**_
> > *Originally posted by **[Banerang](/forums/727066/topics/1909809?page=1#13389682)**:*
> > **These are getting boring and problematic. Just like the other ones like "Future Cop" or "Grill Battle", these are becoming less fun for the F2P. I can't compete with the top 10 because they toss their cash into it and not skill. So yeah, lame.**
>
> I think that a longer running ECMCs is beneficial for an f2p player compared to a short ECMC. Just by consistently playing, an f2p player will rank higher during a long challenge than during a short one if the frequency of the challenge is the same, e.g. one challenge per month. The p2w players will spend their money regardless, no matter if the challenge is short or long.
No it is not, a longer ECMC only benefits big spenders as tier boxes, mythic boxes and other shop items give these people an opportunity to surpass any F2P members and get the top prizes. But in the end you are right as the ECMC will only benefit big spenders no matter the length of the ECMC.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[tom_tomtom](/forums/726779/topics/1909809?page=2#13390520):**_
> > *Originally posted by **[JeremyC1426](/forums/727066/topics/1909809?page=1#13389675)**:*
> >
> > I am not upset about anyone who spends ridiculous amounts of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ on this game. More upset that Kongregate made $200,000 in the month of April alone while this pandemic was going on and showed no support for its members of AT and this was just what they made from the AT community. This is the first sign of a dying game, no new content and trying to get as much money from it player base as possible before they announce it.
>
> From where do you get that number? Is there a link that verifies that Kong earned $200,000 in April from AT?
I posted the website but it got admined, but I found the info on an apple site so I don't know if this figure includes PC or Android purchases.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
These need to take a LOOOOOOOOONG break.
|
|
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[sheabeauxof4](/forums/726779/topics/1909809?page=2#13390775):**_
> > _Originally posted by **[gimmereward](/forums/726779/topics/1909809?page=2#13389905):**_
> > What a miserable bunch of people.
>
> Who?
Captain Complainy Pants and the Hissy Fit Brigade.
Their cadence is "AWWW THIS SUCKS!!"
It's not very catchy.
|
 "5pace4ce"){kind=small}
 "gimmereward"){kind=avatar}
 "mimosoeren"){kind=small}
 "abigailbrooklinn"){kind=small}
 "Sillyboy888"){kind=small}
 "TerrickT"){kind=small}
 "tom_tomtom"){kind=small}
 "MisterSinister"){kind=small}
 "sheabeauxof4"){kind=avatar}
 "JeremyC1426"){kind=small}
 "Gecko_D"){kind=small}